科学论文内容本体比较研究
发布时间：2019-03-29 06:07
【摘要】：科学论文内容本体规范地定义了构成科学论文的内容组件及其关系,比较不同本体的差异有助于更全面地理解论文内容单元的多维语义属性,进而开发更完善的富语义出版物模型。在回顾科学论文内容本体产生及发展历史基础上,选取具有代表性的6种科学论文内容本体,从组件及关系角度分析不同本体的差异,探讨其理论根源和应用。分析表明,科学论文内容本体类型多样,但在组件及关系分类和属性定义上缺乏统一的理论框架,又因领域和情景差异,在一定程度上制约了内容本体的实例化应用。未来有必要加强用户需求研究,进一步明确本体开发方向,提高内容本体的可用性。
[Abstract]:The content ontology of scientific papers defines the content components of scientific papers and their relationships. Comparing the differences of different ontologies is helpful to understand the multidimensional semantic attributes of the content units of scientific papers in a more comprehensive way. Then we develop a more perfect semantic publication model. On the basis of reviewing the history of the emergence and development of the content ontology of scientific papers, this paper selects six representative content ontologies of scientific papers, analyzes the differences of different ontologies from the point of view of components and relationships, and probes into the theoretical roots and applications of different ontologies. The analysis shows that there are many types of content ontology in scientific papers, but there is no unified theoretical framework in component and relation classification and attribute definition, and the instantiation application of content ontology is restricted to some extent because of the difference of domain and situation. In the future, it is necessary to strengthen the research of user requirements, further clarify the direction of ontology development, and improve the usability of content ontology.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学信息管理学院;武汉大学信息资源研究中心;
【基金】：中组部“万人计划” 教育部“新世纪优秀人才”项目资助
【分类号】：G237.5
本文编号：2449222
[Abstract]:The content ontology of scientific papers defines the content components of scientific papers and their relationships. Comparing the differences of different ontologies is helpful to understand the multidimensional semantic attributes of the content units of scientific papers in a more comprehensive way. Then we develop a more perfect semantic publication model. On the basis of reviewing the history of the emergence and development of the content ontology of scientific papers, this paper selects six representative content ontologies of scientific papers, analyzes the differences of different ontologies from the point of view of components and relationships, and probes into the theoretical roots and applications of different ontologies. The analysis shows that there are many types of content ontology in scientific papers, but there is no unified theoretical framework in component and relation classification and attribute definition, and the instantiation application of content ontology is restricted to some extent because of the difference of domain and situation. In the future, it is necessary to strengthen the research of user requirements, further clarify the direction of ontology development, and improve the usability of content ontology.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学信息管理学院;武汉大学信息资源研究中心;
【基金】：中组部“万人计划” 教育部“新世纪优秀人才”项目资助
【分类号】：G237.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 姚志昌;邓群;李成俊;骆振福;;科学论文价值评价的思考[J];中国科技期刊研究;2005年06期
2 熊家国;;科学论文引言的写作及其理论根据[J];中国科技期刊研究;1996年03期
3 任火;论科学论文学术价值评审中的有限性[J];编辑学报;1997年03期
4 刘红;;科学论文中的不当署名与致谢[J];中国科技期刊研究;2005年03期
5 张致浩;在科学论文编撰中自觉运用美学规律[J];编辑学报;2002年02期
6 徐纲红;;提高科学论文学术价值的探讨[J];技术与创新管理;2012年02期
7 孙群;汪海英;;科学论文中概数用法疏误例析[J];中国科技期刊研究;2002年03期
8 翦新春;;撰写及发表SCI论文之我见[J];上海口腔医学;2006年02期
9 刘萍;地学论文中常见的一些问题及应对措施[J];山西地震;2005年02期
10 乔明华;;农科科技论文写作格式及要求[J];贵州农学院学报;1989年02期
，本文编号：2449222
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/2449222.html
