期刊评价结果权威性影响因素分析——以人文社会科学期刊评价为中心

发布时间：2019-04-30 12:15

【摘要】：人文社会科学期刊评价的内涵非常丰富,涉及期刊内容评价和期刊形式评价,其评价结果权威性受到评价目的、评价客体、评价主体等主要因素的影响。与我国人文社会科学尚处于探索阶段相对应,期刊评价在评价目的、评价客体、评价主体方面也存在一定偏差,期刊评价为评价而评价,将期刊简单视为论文之集合,图书情报类专业评价机构越位主导期刊评价。通过剖析存在的这些问题指出,提升期刊评价结果权威性,期刊评价的目的界定为促进期刊发展而评价,现阶段更应该以评价促转型、以评价促发展;期刊评价客体是作为学术传播媒介的学术期刊;评价主体是多元评价主体,尤其强调学术共同体、读者、编辑同行作为评价主体的回归。
[Abstract]:The connotation of the evaluation of humanities and social sciences periodicals is very rich, which involves the content evaluation and the form evaluation of periodicals. The authority of the evaluation results is influenced by the main factors, such as the evaluation purpose, the evaluation object, the evaluation subject, and so on. Compared with Chinese humanities and social sciences, there are some deviations in the evaluation purpose, the evaluation object and the evaluation subject. The journal evaluation is simply regarded as the collection of papers, and the periodical evaluation is simply regarded as the collection of papers, and the periodical evaluation is just a collection of papers. Evaluation of overside leading periodicals by professional evaluation institutions of library and information. Through the analysis of these problems, it is pointed out that the purpose of periodical evaluation is to promote the development of periodicals, and the purpose of periodical evaluation is to promote the development of periodicals. At this stage, evaluation should be used to promote the transformation and development of evaluation. The evaluation object of the journal is the academic journal as the academic media, and the evaluation subject is the multi-evaluation subject, especially emphasizing the return of academic community, readers and editors as the evaluation subject.
【作者单位】：南京大学信息管理学院;
【基金】：全国高等学校文科学报研究会第七届(2013年)编辑学研究基金一般资助课题“我国期刊评价与学术评价现状之反思”(2013YB08) 全国理工农医院校社科学报联络中心2014年度重点资助项目“高校社科期刊评价相关问题研究”(LGNY14A2)阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：G237.5

【参考文献】