网络软件著作权保护与侵权救济问题研究
发布时间：2019-06-14 05:53
【摘要】：科技发展日新月异,人类文明不断向前。互联网的出现深刻地变革了人类生活的几乎所有方面,也给现行的法律制度带来了越来越多的难题,尤其是在新兴的计算机软件行业,原有法律本身已不足以应对现实中的种种法律症结；随着互联网的加入,网络软件更是对传统的法律制度形成了更大的挑战。2007年的珊瑚虫QQ案以其作者陈寿福身陷囹圄结束,其间有许多问题值得我们思考和研究,譬如法院对于珊瑚虫的民事判决给网络著作权的保护带来了哪些启示,珊瑚虫案为何在民事判决后又转入刑事程序,与珊瑚虫QQ类似的外挂软件路在何方等。 时光荏苒,三年后的2010年,因扣扣保镖而激发的360与腾讯公司之间的争斗再次引起人们的关注,同时也给了法律研究者一个对比研究的机会。那么,网络软件与传统计算机软件相比具有哪些不同之处?网络软件的著作权人如何才能更好地维护自己的权利?如何对普遍存在网络软件侵权进行有效的救济?我国现行法律制度应当进行怎样的变革才能紧随时代的发展?诸如此类的诸多题都有待于研究者进行深入的探究。 计算机软件如今已成为信息产业中最重要的组成部分之一,法律对其进行的规制经过几十年的发展也已相对完善。但对网络软件而言,由于其出现时间较晚,故而尚未引起法律研究者的注意,相关法律也并未能及时跟进。笔者在总结计算机软件领域以及网络侵权领域相关文献的基础上,在第一章中对网络软件的由来以及定义在给出了自己的见解。同时读者应当注意的是,本文所要讨论的网络软件以及对其所下的定义是局限在一定范围内的,而非一切和网络有关的软件,其内涵和外延都是相对确定的。 由于网络软件具备一些一般计算机软件所不具备的特点,其权利的行使也与后者有着诸多不同。本文第二章探讨了在网络软件领域可能被侵犯的几个著作权的权能,对网络软件领域的复制权、修改权、发行权以及信息网络传播权等权能的侵权构成进行了详尽的阐述。而后以此为工具对本文所提到的两个案件进行分析,回答了扣扣保镖与珊瑚虫QQ有哪些异同这一问题,指出了网络软件领域侵权构成的关键所在。 仅仅指出哪些权能可能被侵犯并不足够,法制的缺失使得网络软件著作权人对如何保护自己的著作权不能有系统的考虑和安排,笔者在本文的第三章对此给出了自己的建议。相信这些建议能为网络软件著作权人更加完善地维护自己的权利提供一些帮助。 同样地,在法制确实的背景下,软件开发者也不知道怎样做才能规避侵权以维护自己开发软件的权利。第四章对这一问题给出了自己的建议。同时在网络软件的侵权救济问题上,笔者结合案例对网络软件著作权侵权救济的三种救济方式进行了详细的讨论以及评价。希望这些建议能够为我国网络软件领域法制的健全以及网络软件的发展贡献出一份绵薄之力。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of science and technology, human civilization is moving forward. The emergence of the Internet has changed the almost all aspects of human life and brought more and more difficulties to the existing legal system, especially in the emerging computer software industry. With the introduction of the Internet, the network software has made a great challenge to the traditional legal system. In 2007, the QQ case of the bug was concluded by the author, Chen Shoufu, and there were a lot of problems for us to think and study. For instance, the court's civil judgment on the worm of the Internet has brought some enlightenment to the protection of the copyright of the network, why the case of the bug is transferred to the criminal procedure after the civil judgment, where the external store software similar to the bug QQ is, etc. In 2010, three years later, the fighting between 360 and Tencent, which was inspired by the deduction of security guards, again raised concerns, and also gave legal researchers a comparative study. Yes. So, what is the difference between the network software and the traditional computer software How can the copyright owner of the network software better maintain its own right How to effectively save the widespread network software infringement The current legal system of our country should carry on the reform in order to follow the development of the times All the questions, such as the show, need to be explored by the researchers. The computer software has become one of the most important components in the information industry, and the regulation of the law has been developed for several decades. In the case of network software, due to the late appearance of the network software, the legal researchers have not been brought to the attention of the legal researchers, and the relevant laws do not On the basis of summarizing the computer software and the relevant literature in the field of network tort, in the first chapter, the author and the definition of the network software are given. At the same time, the reader should note that the network software to be discussed in this paper, as well as its definition, is limited to a certain extent, not all the software related to the network, its connotation and the extension are relative to each other. As the network software has the characteristics of some general computer software, the exercise of its rights is also related to the latter. In the second chapter, the paper discusses the capability of several copyright which may be infringed in the field of network software, and makes the right of copying, modifying, issuing right and information network communication right in the field of network software. In this paper, the two cases mentioned in this paper are analyzed in this paper, and the similarities and differences between the buckle bodyguard and the bug QQ are analyzed, and the tort composition in the area of network software is pointed out. The key point of this paper is to point out which capabilities may be violated and not enough, and the absence of the legal system makes the copyright owner of the network software do not have the systematic consideration and arrangement of how to protect the copyright of the copyright owner. In the third chapter, the author I believe that these suggestions can be more perfect for the copyright owners of the network software to safeguard their rights In the same way, under the true background of the rule of law, software developers do not know how to do so to avoid infringement for maintenance The right of the software to be developed. The fourth chapter is to the question At the same time, in the case of the tort relief of the network software, the author combined the case to the three kinds of relief methods of the copyright infringement relief of the network software Detailed discussion and evaluation. It is hoped that these suggestions can be the sound of the legal system in the network software field of our country and the development of the network software
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923.41
本文编号：2499162
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of science and technology, human civilization is moving forward. The emergence of the Internet has changed the almost all aspects of human life and brought more and more difficulties to the existing legal system, especially in the emerging computer software industry. With the introduction of the Internet, the network software has made a great challenge to the traditional legal system. In 2007, the QQ case of the bug was concluded by the author, Chen Shoufu, and there were a lot of problems for us to think and study. For instance, the court's civil judgment on the worm of the Internet has brought some enlightenment to the protection of the copyright of the network, why the case of the bug is transferred to the criminal procedure after the civil judgment, where the external store software similar to the bug QQ is, etc. In 2010, three years later, the fighting between 360 and Tencent, which was inspired by the deduction of security guards, again raised concerns, and also gave legal researchers a comparative study. Yes. So, what is the difference between the network software and the traditional computer software How can the copyright owner of the network software better maintain its own right How to effectively save the widespread network software infringement The current legal system of our country should carry on the reform in order to follow the development of the times All the questions, such as the show, need to be explored by the researchers. The computer software has become one of the most important components in the information industry, and the regulation of the law has been developed for several decades. In the case of network software, due to the late appearance of the network software, the legal researchers have not been brought to the attention of the legal researchers, and the relevant laws do not On the basis of summarizing the computer software and the relevant literature in the field of network tort, in the first chapter, the author and the definition of the network software are given. At the same time, the reader should note that the network software to be discussed in this paper, as well as its definition, is limited to a certain extent, not all the software related to the network, its connotation and the extension are relative to each other. As the network software has the characteristics of some general computer software, the exercise of its rights is also related to the latter. In the second chapter, the paper discusses the capability of several copyright which may be infringed in the field of network software, and makes the right of copying, modifying, issuing right and information network communication right in the field of network software. In this paper, the two cases mentioned in this paper are analyzed in this paper, and the similarities and differences between the buckle bodyguard and the bug QQ are analyzed, and the tort composition in the area of network software is pointed out. The key point of this paper is to point out which capabilities may be violated and not enough, and the absence of the legal system makes the copyright owner of the network software do not have the systematic consideration and arrangement of how to protect the copyright of the copyright owner. In the third chapter, the author I believe that these suggestions can be more perfect for the copyright owners of the network software to safeguard their rights In the same way, under the true background of the rule of law, software developers do not know how to do so to avoid infringement for maintenance The right of the software to be developed. The fourth chapter is to the question At the same time, in the case of the tort relief of the network software, the author combined the case to the three kinds of relief methods of the copyright infringement relief of the network software Detailed discussion and evaluation. It is hoped that these suggestions can be the sound of the legal system in the network software field of our country and the development of the network software
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923.41
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵俊林;计算机软件法律保护模式研究[J];当代法学;2003年04期
2 王迁;;网络环境中版权直接侵权的认定[J];东方法学;2009年02期
3 王迁;P2P软件提供者的帮助侵权责任——美国最高法院Grokster案判决评析[J];电子知识产权;2005年09期
4 付迁;;法不容情——腾讯QQ珊瑚虫版软件侵权案之管见[J];中国发明与专利;2008年02期
5 王迁;;论“网络传播行为”的界定及其侵权认定[J];法学;2006年05期
6 梅术文;;信息网络传播权合理使用的立法完善[J];法学;2008年06期
7 孟杨;;对两起信息网络传播侵权诉讼案的比较研究[J];法制与社会;2009年06期
8 王迁;;论著作权法中“发行”行为的界定——兼评“全球首宗BT刑事犯罪案”[J];华东政法学院学报;2006年03期
9 陈乃蔚,宋海;计算机软件侵权的认定[J];上海交通大学学报(社会科学版);1999年04期
10 王迁;论网络环境中发行权的适用[J];知识产权;2001年04期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 冯晓青;[N];中国知识产权报;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 肖波;互联网环境下计算机软件的侵权与保护[D];西南大学;2006年
2 薛秀玉;计算机软件著作权侵权的认定[D];西南政法大学;2007年
3 秦健峰;网络游戏外挂相关法律研究与对策[D];清华大学;2007年
4 陈兆勇;网络游戏外挂的法律问题研究[D];西南政法大学;2009年
5 封爱青;计算机软件最终用户侵权责任研究[D];山东大学;2009年
6 葛晓春;恶意软件的民事法律规制[D];南京理工大学;2010年
7 孙桂娟;关于“流氓软件”的案例分析[D];兰州大学;2010年
，本文编号：2499162
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/2499162.html
