毛泽东与习近平群众观的比较研究

发布时间：2018-02-28 00:10

本文关键词： 毛泽东习近平群众观比较研究　出处：《南京师范大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：毛泽东与习近平的群众观具有丰富的内涵,两者的群众观充分体现了马克思主义政党性质和全心全意为人民服务的宗旨。而当前我们党所出现得严重的“四风”问题,一些党员干部严重脱离人民群众,甚至出现人民群众办事难,出门办事看脸色的现象。更有一些党员干部搞权钱交易、以权谋私、贪污腐败、违法乱纪,完全不把人民群众放在眼里,严重损害了群众的利益,破坏了党群的血肉关系。究其原因是部分党员干部的群众观日渐淡薄。本文主要运用文献研究方法、比较分析方法和理论与实践相结合的方法来系统地研究毛泽东与习近平的群众观,在分析两者群众观形成和发展的过程,挖掘其背后的理论渊源和实践基础,归纳总结两者群众观内容的基础上,高度概括出两者群众观的异同。这对于加强党的群众观念,保持党与人民群众的联系,提高党的执政能力,以及全面建成小康社会,实现中华民族伟大复兴的中国梦具有重要的理论价值和实践意义。本文主要从以下四个章节对毛泽东与习近平的群众观进行比较研究:第一章主要是对毛泽东与习近平群众观发展历程的比较。主要是从萌芽时期、形成时期、发展时期、深化时期这四个阶段进行纵向比较,分析总结出两者群众观形成发展过程的异同。第二章是对毛泽东与习近平群众观形成基础的比较。主要从毛泽东与习近平群众观形成的时代背景、理论基础与实践来源进行纵向比较。在深入挖掘背后形成的动因的基础上,总结概括出两者群众观形成的异同。第三章是对毛泽东与习近平群众观内容的比较。这章是本论文的重点和难点,不仅概括出两者群众观的内容,还要对其群众观的内容进行比较研究,本章主要从毛泽东与习近平群众观对群众利益的认识、人民群众作用的认识、毛泽东与习近平在党的作风建设中的群众观以及毛泽东与习近平群众工作方法论这四个方面进行横向比较。第四章是对毛泽东与习近平群众观的现实价值进行比较研究。
[Abstract]:Mao Zedong and Xi Jinping have rich connotations in their views on the masses, which fully embody the nature of Marxist political parties and the purpose of serving the people wholeheartedly. Some Party members and cadres are seriously divorced from the masses, and even have difficulty in handling affairs among the people and go out to handle affairs to see their faces. Even more, some party members and cadres engage in power and money transactions, abuse their power for personal gain, corrupt and corrupt, and violate the law and discipline. Completely disregarding the masses of the people, seriously harming the interests of the masses and damaging the flesh and blood relations of the Party and the masses. The reason is that the mass view of some party members and cadres is becoming weaker and weaker. This paper mainly uses the method of literature research. The comparative analysis method and the combination of theory and practice are used to systematically study the mass view of Mao Zedong and Xi Jinping, to analyze the process of their formation and development, and to excavate the theoretical origin and practical foundation behind them. On the basis of summing up the contents of the two views on the masses, the similarities and differences of the two views of the masses are highly summarized. This will strengthen the Party's concept of the masses, maintain the relationship between the Party and the masses, improve the Party's governing ability, and build a well-off society in an all-round way. Chinese Dream, who has realized the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, has important theoretical value and practical significance. This paper mainly makes a comparative study on the mass views of Mao Zedong and Xi Jinping from the following four chapters: the first chapter is mainly about the views of the masses of Mao Zedong and Xi Jinping. The comparison of the Development course of Xi Jinping's Mass View, mainly from the budding period, The four stages of formation, development and deepening are compared vertically. The second chapter is a comparison of the forming basis of Mao Zedong's and Xi Jinping's views on the masses, mainly from the background of the formation of the concept of the masses in the context of the formation of the concept of the masses of Mao Zedong and Mao Zedong, and the analysis of the differences and similarities in the process of the formation and development of the two views. The theoretical basis is compared vertically with the practical source. On the basis of digging deeply into the motive behind the formation of the theory, The third chapter is a comparison between Mao Zedong and Xi Jinping. This chapter is the focus and difficulty of this paper, not only generalizing the content of the two views. We should also make a comparative study of the contents of their views on the masses. This chapter mainly focuses on the understanding of the interests of the masses, the role of the people, and the views of the masses of Mao Zedong and Xi Jinping. Mao Zedong and Xi Jinping's views on the masses in the construction of the Party's style of work and the methodology of the mass work in the Party's construction are compared horizontally. Chapter 4th is a comparative study of the realistic value of the views on the masses of the two groups.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D252

【相似文献】