当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 党建论文 >

零容忍视角下的腐败容忍度影响因素研究

发布时间:2018-04-04 04:32

  本文选题:腐败容忍度 切入点:反腐效果 出处:《南昌大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:腐败零容忍的社会环境是实现风清气正政治生态的基础。十八大以来,中央采取了一系列的反腐败措施,但反腐败效果是否影响公众的腐败容忍度则有待经验研究验证。通过问卷调查分析发现,受访者对腐败的容忍度,尤其是黑色腐败的容忍度普遍较低;利益相关度和黑色、灰色和白色三种腐败现象的容忍度之间有显著的正相关关系。反腐效果显著影响公职人员对黑色腐败的容忍度,但对非公职人员不显著;反腐非预期后果显著正向影响黑色和灰色腐败容忍度,对非公职人员的影响更显著。另外,地方经济发展和个人经济状况与灰色腐败容忍度负相关,但与白色和黑色腐败容忍度关系不显著。这些发现表明,社会的腐败容忍度普遍偏低,但短期内反腐效果越好,公职人员腐败容忍度反而会更高。只有持之以恒的严厉反腐才能缓慢改变腐败风气,形成零容忍的政治生态。发展经济和打击影响公众利益的腐败,在反腐败的同时改善政府回应性和治理为官不为现象,也能有效降低社会的腐败容忍度。
[Abstract]:The social environment of zero tolerance of corruption is the foundation of realizing the political ecology.Since the 18th National Congress, the Central Committee has taken a series of anti-corruption measures, but whether the anti-corruption effect affects the tolerance of public corruption needs empirical research and verification.Through the questionnaire survey, we found that the tolerance of corruption, especially black corruption, was generally low, and there was a significant positive correlation between interest correlation and tolerance of black, gray and white corruption.The effect of anti-corruption significantly affected the tolerance of public officials to black corruption, but not to non-public officials; the unintended consequences of anti-corruption significantly positively affected the tolerance of black and gray corruption, and the impact on non-public officials was more significant.In addition, local economic development and personal economic status were negatively correlated with the tolerance of grey corruption, but had no significant relationship with the tolerance of white and black corruption.These findings suggest that corruption tolerance in society is generally low, but in the short term the better the corruption tolerance of public officials will be.Only persistent and severe anti-corruption can slowly change the corrupt atmosphere and form the political ecology of zero tolerance.The development of economy and the fight against corruption which affect the public interest can also effectively reduce the tolerance of corruption in the society by improving the responsiveness of the government and the phenomenon of not acting as a government official while fighting against corruption.
【学位授予单位】:南昌大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D262.6

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 曾明;章辉腾;;官员作风、反腐努力与政府信任:大学生的视角[J];湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2016年02期

2 彭庆红;潘春玲;;当代青年对特权的认知与态度调查分析[J];中国青年研究;2015年12期

3 周围;;腐败成因:一种社会文化心理的视角[J];廉政文化研究;2015年05期

4 朱琳;宫伏佳;;腐败主客观测量结果差异性研究[J];经济社会体制比较;2015年05期

5 肖云忠;张丽丽;;利益诱惑情境与腐败事件的生成及控制——基于18个典型案例的分析[J];廉政文化研究;2015年03期

6 孙敬良;梅海;;腐败与文化的回归分析[J];华南农业大学学报(社会科学版);2015年02期

7 曾明;郑旭旭;章辉腾;;治理结构,权力机制与高校腐败——基于117个高校腐败案例的分析[J];廉政文化研究;2015年02期

8 倪星;孙宗锋;;政府反腐败力度与公众清廉感知:差异及解释——基于G省的实证分析[J];政治学研究;2015年01期

9 牛月永;;关于民主反腐的几点思考[J];中央社会主义学院学报;2014年05期

10 贺夏蓉;;强化对腐败零容忍的主流文化[J];中国纪检监察;2014年17期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 吴玲娟;试论腐败的成因与反腐败制度建设[D];浙江大学;2004年



本文编号:1708381

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/dangjiandangzheng/1708381.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户067ae***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com