中国共产党党内纪律处分制度研究
发布时间:2018-06-30 04:15
本文选题:中国共产党党内纪律处分 + 纪律处分制度 ; 参考:《安庆师范大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:中国共产党自创立之日起就把纪律视为生命线,严明的党纪,是我们党创建、发展和壮大的根本保障,是我们党区别于其他一切政党和派别组织的独特优势和“政治基因”。当然,制度化——特别是党内纪律处分问题的制度化有一个发展过程,基本可以分为三个阶段,新民主主义革命时期党内纪律处分制度处于不断尝试阶段(一大到七届二中全会),新中国成立后党内纪律处分制度建设曲折发展阶段(七届二中全会到十一届三中全会),改革开放后我党的纪律处分制度建设迎来了新的发展时期(十一届三中全会到十八大)。当下中国共产党党内纪律处分制度己形成一个完整的科学的体系,但这并不意味着没有发展的空间,不可否认,当下党内纪律处分制度还存在一些问题,诸如党内纪律处分法规体系还有待进一步完善、立法主体行为有待进一步规范、违纪归责体系缺乏统一的认定标准、审查程序正当性不足等依然困扰着党内纪律处分的发展和完善,影响到党内纪律处分制度作用的发挥,对贯彻“全面从严治党”提出来真实而迫切的挑战,等等。因此,有必要从以下几个方面做进一步的努力:完善党内纪律处分法规体系,重构违纪归责体系,强化处分程序,等等。
[Abstract]:Since its founding, the Communist Party of China has regarded discipline as the lifeline. Strict party discipline is the fundamental guarantee for our party to establish, develop, and expand, and is the unique advantage and "political gene" of our party that distinguishes it from all other political parties and factional organizations. Of course, institutionalization, especially the institutionalization of inner-party disciplinary matters, has a process of development. Basically, it can be divided into three stages. During the period of the New Democratic Revolution, the disciplinary system within the Party was in a trial stage (from the first session to the second Plenary session of the Seventh CPC Central Committee), and after the founding of the people's Republic of China, the disciplinary system within the Party was in a tortuous stage of development (from the second Plenary session of the Seventh Central Committee to the third After the reform and opening up, the construction of our party's disciplinary system ushered in a new development period (from the third Plenary session of the Eleventh Central Committee to the 18th National Congress of the CPC Central Committee). At present, the disciplinary system within the CPC has formed a complete scientific system, but this does not mean that there is no room for development. It is undeniable that there are still some problems in the current disciplinary system within the CPC. For example, the system of inner-party disciplinary laws and regulations still needs to be further improved, the behavior of legislative subjects needs to be further standardized, and the system of imputation and liability for violations of discipline lacks a unified identification standard. The lack of legitimacy of the examination procedure still puzzles the development and perfection of the inner-party disciplinary action, affects the function of the inner-party disciplinary system, and puts forward a real and urgent challenge to the implementation of "overall strict administration of the Party", and so on. Therefore, it is necessary to make further efforts from the following aspects: perfecting the inner-party disciplinary system, reconstructing the system of imputation, strengthening the disciplinary procedure, and so on.
【学位授予单位】:安庆师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D262.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 ;关于新形势下党内政治生活的若干准则[J];新湘评论;2017年06期
2 ;中国共产党党内监督条例[J];实践(思想理论版);2016年11期
3 程同顺;陈永国;;党纪与国法衔接协同实现路径的思考[J];长白学刊;2016年05期
4 张东保;;纪律“活”在党章里——党章中有关纪律内容的历史演进[J];上海党史与党建;2016年09期
5 ;中国共产党的九十年[J];全国新书目;2016年07期
6 钟纪晟;;关于新修订的《中国共产党地方委员会工作条例》施行后涉及执纪审理有关问题的理解与适用[J];中国纪检监察;2016年10期
7 张莉莉;;新常态视阈下加强党的纪律建设路径探析[J];忻州师范学院学报;2016年01期
8 马怀德;;国家监察体制改革的重要意义和主要任务[J];国家行政学院学报;2016年06期
9 申建林;;党规党纪的修订及其实施效果分析[J];武汉大学学报(人文科学版);2016年01期
10 张国生;;党内法规体系若干问题的思考[J];上海党史与党建;2016年01期
,本文编号:2084830
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/dangjiandangzheng/2084830.html