从“麻雀”到“害人鸟”:五十年代中后期灭雀运动的话语逻辑
发布时间:2018-08-11 16:43
【摘要】:20世纪50年代,"麻雀"成为"害人鸟"的话语塑造与同时期开展的整风运动到反右派斗争之间存在密切关联。"双百"到"整风"使"麻雀"成为讨论热点,反右派斗争的推进则使麻雀问题日益被赋予政治意义,逐渐被塑造成"害人鸟"。上海舆论宣传领域反右派斗争进程中的关键事件在"麻雀"与"运动"间建立起种种或明或隐的关联。无论是作为"科学范畴"的讨论,还是以"社会运动"叙述模式呈现的"麻雀"问题讨论,归根结底都是作为舆论宣传的不同表现形式,展示出多重关系的复杂历史图景。
[Abstract]:In the 1950s, there was a close relationship between the discourse shaping of the "sparrow" as a "bird killer" and the rectification movement carried out at the same time and the struggle against the right. " Shuangbai to "rectification" made the "sparrow" a hot topic of discussion, and the promotion of the struggle against the right made the issue of sparrow increasingly political and gradually shaped as "killing birds". The key events in the struggle against the Rightists in the field of public opinion and propaganda in Shanghai have established various or implicit connections between the "sparrow" and the "movement". Whether it is a discussion of "scientific category" or a discussion of "sparrow" as a narrative mode of "social movement", it is, in the final analysis, a complex historical picture of multiple relations as different forms of public opinion propaganda.
【作者单位】: 复旦大学历史学系;
【分类号】:D231
本文编号:2177611
[Abstract]:In the 1950s, there was a close relationship between the discourse shaping of the "sparrow" as a "bird killer" and the rectification movement carried out at the same time and the struggle against the right. " Shuangbai to "rectification" made the "sparrow" a hot topic of discussion, and the promotion of the struggle against the right made the issue of sparrow increasingly political and gradually shaped as "killing birds". The key events in the struggle against the Rightists in the field of public opinion and propaganda in Shanghai have established various or implicit connections between the "sparrow" and the "movement". Whether it is a discussion of "scientific category" or a discussion of "sparrow" as a narrative mode of "social movement", it is, in the final analysis, a complex historical picture of multiple relations as different forms of public opinion propaganda.
【作者单位】: 复旦大学历史学系;
【分类号】:D231
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 华崞;;60年前的一次动迁[J];上海房地;2011年09期
2 ;党史展里的“豆腐账”[J];党的建设;2001年10期
,本文编号:2177611
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/dangjiandangzheng/2177611.html