我国公众反腐败行动的现状及其影响因素研究——基于2015年度全国廉情调查数据的实证分析

发布时间：2018-09-11 06:56

【摘要】：基于2015年度全国廉情调查数据,采用聚类Logit回归分析方法对我国公众反腐败行动的现状及其影响因素进行了探索性研究。研究发现:在文化环境方面,公众的腐败容忍度与其反腐败行动之间存在显著的负向关系;在政府反腐败绩效方面,公众对政府的反腐败满意度与其反腐败行动之间存在显著的负向关系,腐败感知水平的提升会显著地提升公众反腐败行动的可能性,反腐败信心与公众反腐败行动之间的关系不显著;在制度安排方面,举报的便利性、有效性和安全性均会显著地提高公众反腐败行动的可能性;在腐败经历方面,行贿经历会显著地降低公众反腐败行动的可能性,而被索贿经历则会显著地提升公众反腐败行动的可能性。基于此,必须努力营造对腐败零容忍的社会文化,培育公众的主体意识,为公众参与反腐提供安全和便利的制度环境。
[Abstract]:Based on the data of the National Integrity Survey in 2015, this paper makes an exploratory study on the current situation and the influencing factors of the public action against corruption in China by cluster Logit regression analysis. The study found that in the cultural environment, there was a significant negative relationship between public tolerance for corruption and its anti-corruption actions; in the context of government anti-corruption performance, there was a significant negative correlation between the public's tolerance to corruption and its anti-corruption actions. There is a significant negative relationship between the public's satisfaction with the government's anti-corruption and its anti-corruption actions. The improvement of the level of corruption awareness will significantly enhance the possibility of the public's anti-corruption action. The relationship between anti-corruption confidence and public action against corruption is not significant; in terms of institutional arrangements, the convenience, effectiveness and security of reporting will significantly increase the likelihood of public action against corruption; and in terms of corruption experiences, Bribery experience significantly reduces the likelihood of public action against corruption while being asked for bribes significantly increases the likelihood of public action against corruption. Based on this, we must strive to create a social culture of zero tolerance to corruption, cultivate public awareness of the subject, and provide a safe and convenient institutional environment for public participation in anti-corruption.
【作者单位】：中山大学中国公共管理研究中心;中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目(13&ZD011)
【分类号】：D262.6

【相似文献】