当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 党建论文 >

全面从严治党背景下纪检监察体制改革研究

发布时间:2019-01-20 15:00
【摘要】:腐败是“政治之癌”,防治和遏制腐败是各国政府面临的重大课题。当前,我国腐败形势非常严峻,腐败现象复杂化和腐败手段多样化等特点加大了反腐难度。全面从严治党背景下,我国的纪检监察体制改革,对保持党的先进性和纯洁性、巩固党的执政地位;保持高压的反腐态势、打赢反腐败斗争这场正义之战具有重要的时代价值。在十八届中央纪委七次全会上,习近平总书记指出:“反腐败斗争压倒性态势已经形成”,说明我国的反腐败工作取得了长足的发展。“打虎”、“拍蝇”、“猎狐”一起抓,已在一定程度上遏制了腐败的蔓延趋势。在接下来的反腐实践中,深入推进纪检监察体制改革,有利于书写反腐防腐的优异答卷。本文以无产阶级权力监督理论和中国特色社会主义反腐败理论为指导,对我国纪检监察体制进行历史考察和现状分析,得出我国纪检监察体制运行过程中存在职责权限不合理、独立性缺失、授权不充分、队伍建设不健全、监督制约机制不完善等问题,影响纪检监察机关的反腐效能。在明确纪检监察机关高效履职应具备独立、权威、专业和廉洁等基本特征和全面从严治党对纪检监察机关提出的“三转”新要求的基础上,立足当前纪检监察体制改革的探索,提出进一步深化纪检监察体制改革的构想。结合北京、浙江和山西这三个省市国家监察委员会的改革试点,借鉴香港廉政公署和新加坡反贪污调查局的成功经验,进一步深化纪检监察体制改革,使监察委员会在党的领导下,独立性不断提升、权威性和廉洁性得到保障、队伍建设不断强化,从而集中统一、权威高效地领导我国的反腐败斗争工作,集中反腐合力,打赢反腐攻坚战。
[Abstract]:Corruption is the cancer of politics. At present, the corruption situation in our country is very severe, the corruption phenomenon complicates and the corruption means diversification and so on the characteristic has increased the anti-corruption difficulty. Under the background of managing the party strictly, the reform of discipline inspection and supervision system in our country is of great value in maintaining the advanced nature and purity of the party, consolidating the ruling position of the party, maintaining the high-pressure anti-corruption situation and winning the fight against corruption, which is a just war. At the Seventh Plenary session of the 18th Central Commission for discipline Inspection, General Secretary Xi Jinping pointed out: "the overwhelming situation in the fight against corruption has taken shape," indicating that China's anti-corruption work has made great progress. The attack of tiger, fly and fox hunt together has curbed the spreading trend of corruption to some extent. In the following anti-corruption practice, in-depth reform of discipline inspection and supervision system is conducive to writing the excellent answer paper of anti-corruption and anticorrosion. Under the guidance of proletarian power supervision theory and socialism anti-corruption theory with Chinese characteristics, this paper makes a historical investigation and analysis of the discipline inspection and supervision system in China, and concludes that there are unreasonable duties and powers in the running process of discipline inspection and supervision system in China. Lack of independence, inadequate delegation of authority, imperfect team construction, imperfect supervision and restriction mechanism affect the anti-corruption efficiency of discipline inspection and supervision organs. On the basis of making clear that the discipline inspection and supervision organs should have the basic characteristics of independence, authority, professionalism and integrity, and on the basis of comprehensively and strictly administering the new requirements of "three turns" put forward by the party to discipline inspection and supervision organs, and on the basis of the exploration of the current discipline inspection and supervision system reform, Put forward the idea of further deepening the reform of discipline inspection and supervision system. In connection with the pilot reform of the National Supervisory Committees of Beijing, Zhejiang and Shanxi provinces and cities, and drawing on the successful experience of the Independent Commission against Corruption in Hong Kong and the Anti-Corruption investigation Bureau of Singapore, the reform of the discipline inspection and supervision system will be further deepened. Under the leadership of the Party, the supervisory committee has been continuously promoted in its independence, its authority and integrity have been guaranteed, and the building of its ranks has been continuously strengthened, thus centralizing unity, leading the anti-corruption struggle in our country with authority and efficiency, and concentrating efforts to combat corruption. Win the fight against corruption.
【学位授予单位】:江南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D262.6

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 童之伟;;对监察委员会自身的监督制约何以强化[J];法学评论;2017年01期

2 ;中共中央办公厅印发国家监察体制改革试点方案[J];中国纪检监察;2016年22期

3 任建明;张君翼;;中国反腐败机构改革研究——基于中国香港和中国内地间的比较[J];北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版);2016年01期

4 邹洪凯;;国家治理现代化视阈中的纪检监察工作[J];廉政文化研究;2014年03期

5 李年;;新加坡的反腐经验及其启示[J];新西部(理论版);2012年Z4期

6 黄晓辉;;列宁的廉政机构建设思想[J];廉政文化研究;2012年02期

7 潘加军;鞠连和;;纪检监察派驻机构统一管理模式分析[J];中州学刊;2010年06期

8 张健;;反腐外部监督机制的比较与完善[J];西南政法大学学报;2007年06期

9 李力;;香港与内地反贪机关的几点比较[J];中共成都市委党校学报;2007年03期

10 陈辉;范红娟;;香港廉政公署研究[J];理论导刊;2006年01期

相关重要报纸文章 前5条

1 李志勇;;巩固反腐败斗争压倒性态势[N];中国纪检监察报;2017年

2 瞿們;何韬;张磊;颜新文;;三省市监察体制改革试点工作透视[N];中国纪检监察报;2017年

3 ;构建权威高效的国家监察体系[N];人民日报;2016年

4 周英;;“三转”怎么转[N];中国纪检监察报;2014年

5 冉刚;;独立性,反腐败机构的生命线[N];中国纪检监察报;2014年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 陈诚;中国大陆反腐败机构设置研究[D];南京师范大学;2015年

2 吴凡;我国反腐败组织机构设置和运行机制研究[D];南京师范大学;2015年

3 王克伟;基层检察院内设机构设置问题研究[D];内蒙古大学;2014年

4 詹梓艺;我国廉政机构建设研究[D];湖南大学;2014年

5 张易龙;胡锦涛廉政思想研究[D];长沙理工大学;2014年

6 李鑫;香港廉政建设对内地反腐败工作的启示[D];山西财经大学;2014年

7 郭剑;论我国反腐败机构的改革和完善[D];华南理工大学;2010年

8 李作禄;大连市乡镇街道纪检监察体制机制创新研究[D];大连理工大学;2010年

9 梅雪;新加坡与中国反腐机制比较研究[D];山西大学;2010年

10 周晓东;论我国反腐败机构的完善[D];苏州大学;2009年



本文编号:2412136

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/dangjiandangzheng/2412136.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户33d00***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com