民事司法鉴定问题的探讨

发布时间：2018-02-28 21:12

本文关键词： 司法鉴定鉴定人鉴定结论司法鉴定程序　出处：《中国政法大学》2008年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 司法鉴定制度是当代各国司法制度的重要组成部分,在一定程度上反映着一国法律制度、司法制度、诉讼制度、证据制度的灵魂与精髓。因此,分析和探讨一国的司法鉴定制度,就可以在一定程度上把握该国诉讼制度乃至司法制度的全局和品格。基于此,笔者对我国民事司法鉴定中的相关问题进行了初步的探讨。笔者从四个方面对我国民事司法鉴定中的相关问题进行了探讨: 第一章为概述。该章对鉴定以及相关概念进行了界定,对鉴定的种类进行了划分,重申了司法鉴定应当遵循的原则,可以说,该章为下文的论述作了必要的准备,以避免因概念的混乱给相关问题的探讨带了困惑和麻烦。第二章为鉴定的主体。鉴定人是鉴定结论赖以生成的源泉,鉴定人性质的界定、角色的定位、地位的确认以及权利、义务及责任的明晰,对于判断鉴定制度是否合理以及生成的鉴定结论是否客观具有重要的意义,是鉴定体系中不可缺少的重要环节。因而本章对这些问题进行了梳理,并建议引入“专家辅助人”制度,明确司法实践中鉴定人无故不出庭接受询问的法律责任。第三章为鉴定结论。鉴定结论是可以说是整个司法鉴定程序围绕的中心,所有的程序设计都是为了得到一份可靠、有效的鉴定结论,同时鉴定结论作为法定的证据种类,有着其自身特有的证据属性和价值,也正是因为如此,在整个证据体系中,也只有司法鉴定才具有制度建设的意义。因此,笔者对鉴定结论进行了界定、对鉴定结论的特性、价值以及在冲突鉴定结论的选择适用问题上进行了分析和探讨。第四章为司法鉴定程序论。本章包括了司法鉴定程序的启动、实施、质证以及认证四部分,在论述中采用了比较分析的方法,着重论述了民事司法领域中两大法系国家司法鉴定程序的不同,最终为我国司法鉴定程序的完善提供借鉴。笔者试图通过本文的探讨,在民事司法鉴定制度中实现权利与权力的合理配置,纠正在实践工作中错误现象,为我国民事司法鉴定营造一个良好的“司法空间”。但由于笔者理论功底有限,缺少对鉴定工作的实践经验,对许多问题的探讨都只是浅尝则止,其中的疏漏错误请各位老师指正。
[Abstract]:Judicial identification system is an important part of the judicial system of contemporary countries, to a certain extent, it reflects the soul and essence of a country's legal system, judicial system, litigation system, and evidence system. By analyzing and discussing the judicial identification system of a country, we can grasp the overall situation and character of the litigation system and even the judicial system to a certain extent. Based on this, the author makes a preliminary discussion on the related problems in the civil judicial expertise of our country. The author probes into the relevant problems in the civil judicial expertise in China from four aspects:. The first chapter is an overview. This chapter defines the identification and related concepts, classifies the types of identification, reaffirms the principles that should be followed in judicial identification, and it can be said that this chapter makes the necessary preparations for the discussion below. In order to avoid the confusion of concepts to the discussion of related problems with confusion and trouble. The second chapter is the subject of the appraisal. The expert is the source of the conclusion, the definition of the nature of the expert, the location of the role, the confirmation of the status, and the clarity of the rights, obligations and responsibilities. It is of great significance to judge whether the appraisal system is reasonable or not and whether the conclusions are objective or not, which is an indispensable and important link in the appraisal system. It is suggested that the system of "expert assistant" should be introduced to clarify the legal liability of experts not appearing for questioning in judicial practice. The third chapter is the conclusion of identification. The conclusion of identification is the center of the whole judicial identification procedure. All the procedures are designed to obtain a reliable and effective conclusion. At the same time, the conclusion of identification is regarded as the legal type of evidence. Has its own unique evidence attribute and the value, also is because of this, in the entire evidence system, only the judicial appraisal also has the system construction significance. Therefore, the author has carried on the definition to the appraisal conclusion, to the appraisal conclusion characteristic, The value and the selection and application of the conclusion of conflict identification are analyzed and discussed. Chapter 4th is the theory of judicial identification procedure. This chapter includes four parts: initiation, implementation, cross-examination and authentication. This paper mainly discusses the differences of the judicial identification procedures between the two legal systems in the field of civil justice, and finally provides reference for the perfection of the judicial identification procedures in our country. The author tries to realize the rational allocation of rights and powers in the civil judicial appraisal system through the discussion of this article, and correct the wrong phenomenon in practice. To create a good "judicial space" for civil judicial expertise in our country. However, due to the author's limited theoretical background and lack of practical experience in the appraisal work, the discussion of many problems is only a simple taste. One of the omissions and errors please ask the teachers to correct.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D918.9

【引证文献】