侦查本体论纲

发布时间：2018-03-17 05:39

本文选题：侦查本体　切入点：SAO　出处：《西南政法大学》2008年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 侦查本体论作为侦查学基础理论的逻辑核心,具有十分重要的学术价值和理论研究意义。本文首先从传统侦查观出发对侦查本体展开论述,指出了两类三种传统侦查观。两类分别是指军事领域的侦察与刑事司法领域的侦查,三种分别是,第一种,以勘验鉴定为核心的技术型侦查观;第二种,以获取情报为主的情报型侦查观;第三种,以程序正义为标志的程序型侦查观。鉴于这些传统侦查观没有对侦查本体予以应有的关注,因而导致了长期以来世人对侦查所持有的神秘主义。破除侦查神秘主义唯有从侦查现象着手对侦查本体加以把握。因为侦查现象是关于侦查本体的近似,而一切侦查现象又都是由侦查律动引起的,所以,通过对侦查现象的理论剖析,我们可以看清其所包含的基本要素。在此还以“红脸盆之谜'为例来分析了侦查的萌动,并证明了从非传统的侦查现象到传统侦查现象的跃升。亦通过对侦查本体、侦查本质、侦查形式与侦查现象的概念辨析,指出侦查本体可定义为对侦查本质的精确描述。把握侦查本体实在可以通过符号抽象与模型构造来实现。因此,为了从深层次上把握侦查本体,还必须对侦查本体进行进一步的符号抽象。侦查本体抽象符号可设定为I。此举可以免除无谓的“查”“察”名实争辩,而侦查本体所涉及的各种模型要素经符号抽象如下:侦查行为A,侦查主体S,侦查客体O,侦查疑域F以及侦查评断J。而由SO与FJ两大概念体系建立的以A为纽带的侦查模型所精确描述之物就是本文论及的侦查本体I。侦查本体I有其本性和表征。I的本性是递归,而I的表征则是无法穷举的各种算法形式——格物致知。由此,我们可以将侦查本体I归结为格物致知之递归。侦查本体还可以通过形而上下的思路进行深度剖析。I的形而上就是侦查本体本性与表征的合体,仍为格物致知之递归。I的形而下可通过各种具体的事物展现,具体可被定义为各种与探索发现活动相似之事物。其内涵是运动行为,外延却是技术与方法混同后的无穷大。另外,我们必须对无限的I之形而下做出限定,而此种限定并非基于人文传统,而是基于实践理性。同时,本文在此分析了传统侦查观出现的原因,其亦是这种人为限定的结果,但却并非基于实践理性。由此展开对侦查理性及其必要性的探讨。本文抛出的侦查理性主要涉及两个方面,一是非攻,二是非蛮。前者是对墨子非攻的援引和延伸。后者则主要出自对侦查能耗的关注。非攻是善恶二元论思路下对侦查功能的道德评断,其理性在于兼爱。非蛮则是博弈论思路下对侦查的经济评断,其理性在于择优。同时,行文至此还从理论上附带解决了有关“诱惑侦查”的争议。在对侦查本体建模的过程中,主要采用了符号抽象与图示法。其建模原理中涉及对侦查本体存在方式和所含要素及其逻辑途径的探讨。侦查本体存在方式类似于求解反问题。我们可以将侦查本体的运动特性归结为时空相互争取的运动,而侦查本体的运动致使现实发生着某种结构和功能上的改变。侦查本体的存在方式可以通过两大要素来加以描述,分别是侦查律动和传递。实现物之占有的运动机理可称其为“侦查律动”。其所产生的另一脉动即为“传递”。侦查意义上的逻辑联系是指事物之间的诠释关系,而不单指因果关系。从无知到知,从疑到无疑,这是侦查律动和传递所依存的两条逻辑途径。侦查本体的收缩和膨胀是侦查律动与传递的体现,在形而下看来其应当是受限的。因而我们在对其进行建模时,必须考虑其模型的界限,使得侦查能够为人所用。侦查本体具有范式,其复制是侦查范式的繁殖性传递。侦查本体理论模型涉及对各种或隐性或显性的自变量、因变量与恒常量的考察。基于结构主义和功能主义,我们可以寻到可拷贝的侦查范式。其功能模型为SAO,结构模型为FIJ。在SAO模型中提出两个命题。第一个命题,SAO模型中,侦查本体I在S和O的赋值发生改变的情况下,只要A不变,I亦不变。第二个命题,SAO模型中,倘若S、A、O三个变量的赋值都发生改变,侦查本体I仍不变——任何情况下,I都是恒常的。SAO模型的构筑是以人和物为外围轮廓,而以侦查行为作为中心纽带,体现着侦查本体功能性的一面。同时分析了SAO模型的同构异体。并对SAO模型进行了评价,其模型缺陷是结构中心的任意性和侦查本体被忽视,对其补救办法有自变量捆绑法和模型间平均法。而FIJ模型则给出了侦查本体的具体线性结构框图。FIJ亦有其同构异体和优缺点。对其功能缺失与能量耗散两大缺陷的补救办法为增加功能结构以及对溢出能量回收。但是孤立的SAO或FIJ是不现实的,现实的侦查本体模型必需依靠SAO与FIJ的协同得以构建。而SAO与FIJ的协同方案有很多,限定于当下的司法实务进行探讨,我们可考虑采用“刑民分离”、“二权分离”以及“程序分离”三大方案予以实现。对此,本文就这三大方案予以简要论述。限于篇幅,本文所述的仅是侦查本体论的简纲。侦查本体尚有许多值得研究之处,而其本体建模与应用更是一项庞杂的精奥工程。要是对侦查本体进行深入研究,相信可以剥离出侦查的本貌,因而可能引发的后果是,许多含糊不清的理论争议将丧失辩论立场,而实践中遇到的许多使人迷惑之处亦可因此得到满意的答复。甚至侦查本体研究的深入最终还可构筑起侦查学中许多分支研究领域,并在实践中引发可预见的理论变革与社会效应。
[Abstract]:The investigation ontology, as the logical core of the basic theory of investigation, has very important academic value and theoretical research significance.
This paper from the view of traditional investigation investigation ontology discussed, pointed out that the two categories of three kinds of traditional concept. Two types of investigation refers to the military field reconnaissance and criminal judicial field investigation, three are, first, technical investigation to inspection and identification as the core concept; second, intelligence type investigation to obtain information based view; third, procedural investigation with procedural justice as a symbol of the concept. In view of the traditional concept of investigation not to investigate the body to pay due attention, resulting in a long time on the investigation of mysticism world holds.
Get rid of the investigation of mysticism only from investigation to grasp the phenomenon of the investigation itself. Because the investigation on the investigation of the phenomenon is approximate ontology, and so all the investigation phenomenon is caused by the investigation, through the investigation on the rhythm of the phenomenon of theoretical analysis, we can see the basic elements it contains. This is the "red basin mystery 'as an example to analyze the investigation starting, and prove that jumped from the traditional to the traditional non investigation phenomenon investigation phenomenon. Also through the investigation on the essence of the concept of ontology, investigation, investigation and investigation form of the phenomenon, the investigation body can be defined as the exact description of the nature of investigation.
Hold the investigation body really can be achieved through abstract symbols and model structure. Therefore, in order to hold the investigation body from the deep, still need further investigation. The investigation of abstract symbols of ontology ontology of abstract symbols can be set to I. this can avoid unnecessary "check" and "police" argument, and various elements of ontology model investigation to the abstract symbols as follows: A S investigation, investigation subject, investigation object O, investigation and investigation of suspected domain F J. investigation body established by the judge SO and FJ two concept system based on A model the investigation link precise description of the paper is the investigation I. ontology I nature and nature characterization of.I and I is recursive, characterization is not exhaustive algorithms form Gewuzhizhi. Thus, our investigation can be attributed to the recursive I ontology Gewuzhizhi.
The body also in-depth analysis of the metaphysical ontology is.I investigation and characterization of the nature of the body through metaphysical ideas, is still the Gewuzhizhi recursive.I and through a variety of specific things to show specific, can be defined as a variety of exploration and discovery activities of similar things. Its connotation is the movement behavior, with extension it is technique and method after infinity. In addition, we must be on the infinite I and make limited, and this limit is not based on the humanistic tradition, but based on the practical reason. At the same time, based on the analysis of the causes of the traditional view of the investigation, this is also the result of artificially, but not on the practical reason. To discuss the rational investigation and its necessity. The rational investigation throws mainly involves two aspects, one is attack, two is not quite. The former is the Mo-tse school's aid Lead and extension. The latter mainly comes from the investigation of energy consumption is concerned. No ditheism ideas of investigation function of moral judgment, the reason is that it is quite universal. Non game theory ideas for investigation of economic evaluation, the reason is preferred. At the same time, here is theoretically solved the related collateral "entrapment" controversy.
In the process of modeling for the investigation of the body, mainly uses abstract symbols and graphical method. The modeling principle involved are discussed and contained elements and logic ways of investigation. The investigation of ontology ontology in a similar way to solving inverse problems. Our investigation can be attributed to the movement characteristics of body movement for each other time the investigation, which leads to the occurrence of a movement of the body structure and function change reality. Existence investigation ontology could be described by the two elements, respectively is the detection of rhythm and transfer. To realize the motion mechanism of possession can be called "the rhythm". Another is the pulse generated by the "transfer". The investigation logic sense refers to the interpretation of the relationship between things, not only refers to the causal relationship. From ignorance to knowledge, from doubt to no doubt, this is the investigation rhythm and the dependence of the two transfer A logical way. The investigation body contraction and expansion is the investigation of rhythm and transfer reflected, and it should be in view is limited. So we in its modeling, must consider the boundary of the model, which can be used for the investigation. The investigation body has its paradigm, replication is the reproduction of the investigation paradigm transfer. Investigation of ontology theory model involving or implicit or explicit arguments, because variables and constant volume.
Doctrine of structuralism and based on the functions we can find copies of the investigative paradigm. The functional model of SAO, the structure model for FIJ. in the SAO model put forward two propositions. First proposition, SAO model, I S in the investigation of ontology assignment and O change, as long as the A constant, I is the same. Second propositions, SAO model, S A O, if the assignment, the three variables are changed, the investigation body I remains unchanged - in any case, I is to build a.SAO model is based on the constant and peripheral contour, and the investigation behavior as the center link, reflect a body of functional investigation. At the same time, analysis of the homogeneous allogenic SAO model. The SAO model was evaluated, the model structure of center of the defect is arbitrary and investigation body is ignored, there are bound variables and the model of average method and its remedy. The FIJ model is given. The specific linear structure block diagram of.FIJ has its isomorphic variant and its advantages and disadvantages. The remedy for its two defects of function loss and energy dissipation is to increase functional structure and spillover energy recovery.
But isolated SAO or FIJ is not realistic, the necessity of building a collaborative ontology model to rely on SAO and FIJ. There are a lot of collaborative design in SAO and FIJ, the judicial practice is limited to the current study, we can consider using the "punishment" separation, "two rights separation" and "separation procedure" the three was implemented. In this regard, the three programs to be discussed.
Because of the limited space, the only outline of investigation ontology. Ontology investigation there are many worthy of research, and the ontology modeling and its application is a complex project. If the essence of an in-depth study of the investigative body, believe that stripping out the investigation of this appearance, which may lead to consequences, the controversial theory of many vague debate will lose position, and encountered in practice many confusing points can therefore get a satisfactory answer. Even the investigation the depth study of ontology can eventually build the investigation in many research areas, and caused the theoretical reform and foreseeable social effects in practice.

【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D918

【参考文献】