群体性事件“导火线”阻断机制研究

发布时间：2018-03-17 15:04

本文选题：群体性事件　切入点：“导火线”事件　出处：《西南政法大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：当前我国正处于社会转型时期，，社会系统正经历着内在结构的变迁，随着新旧体制的更替，社会转型在多重压力下艰难行进。这个激荡的过程一方面有力的促进了经济社会的高速发展，而另一方面，社会结构与利益关系的调整使得社会阶层加速分化，社会利益分配机制失衡，贫富差距不断扩大，在社会公平正义问题凸显的同时也滋生出了仇视官员、仇视富人、仇视社会不公平现象的社会心态问题。这些或显在或潜在的社会风险都为群体性事件的爆发埋下了严重的隐患。当民怨无法通过正常的渠道排解就会形成社会积怨，而当这一地区的社会积怨积累到一定程度，一旦发生能够引起民众高度关注、激起民众怨气的“导火线”事件，便会引爆社会矛盾，从而演变为群体性事件。当前，地方政府无视民怨，漠视民众利益诉求，对敏感事件缺乏必要的监控，要么无视“导火线”事件，要么暴力压制，从而使一些本可以遏制或化解的矛盾发生了转化升级，引发严重的群体性事件。当前尚无群体性事件“导火线”阻断机制的直接研究成果，而政府在实际应对“导火线”事件过程中也存在一些问题，这使得构建群体性事件“导火线”阻断机制具有了重要的意义。本文通过文献研究、案例研究和比较研究的方法，运用社会燃烧理论、冲突的结构箱理论以及冲突阻断理论对典型案例进行分析，在此基础上提出了群体性事件“导火线”阻断的有效对策。首先，文章对群体性事件“导火线”阻断机制进行了概述和相关概念的界定。介绍了群体性事件和“导火线”事件的内涵，“导火线”事件的类型及其特点以及“导火线”事件演变为群体性事件所需要的四个条件，即社会矛盾提供的“燃烧物质”，社会舆论形成的“助燃剂”，“导火线”事件引起的“明火”、政府失效的“防火墙”。本部分内容是研究群体性事件“导火线”阻断机制的基础。其次，文章对“导火线”事件处置不当而演变为群体性事件的典型案例进行了分析。通过对石首事件、通钢事件阻断失败的案例与上海倒楼事件、德江事件的成功处置案例进行对比分析，剖析“导火线”事件的演变过程，以及案例所反映出来的“导火线”阻断机制存在的问题，为接下来的对策分析提供实证基础。再次，文章对当前群体性事件“导火线”阻断机制的现状进行了分析，分析了当前的“导火线”阻断模式存在的问题，为在第五部分构建有针对性的阻断机制提供了依据。最后，文章提出了构建群体性事件“导火线”阻断机制的策略选择。是在正确认识“导火线”事件的性质基础上，利用矛盾酝酿和发展的过程，尽可能把“阻断”的环节提前。具体对策包括完善“导火线”阻断的机制和制度，提高政府应对“导火线”事件的能力，针对不同“导火线”事件类型进行现场处置，发挥非政府组织作为第三方平台的沟通协调功能，提高民众通过体制内途径维权的意识。以期把“导火线”事件化解于当下，防止矛盾的升级和转化。
[Abstract]:At present our country is in the period of social transformation, the social system is experiencing a great change of the internal structure, with the replacement of new and old systems, social transformation under great pressure. The agitation of the struggling process on the one hand, promote the rapid development of economy and society, and on the other hand, the social structure and the adjustment of interests makes the social stratum accelerated differentiation, imbalance of interests distribution mechanism of society, widening gap between rich and poor, while highlighting the problems in social justice breeds hatred officials, hate the rich, hostile social injustice on the social mentality of the problem. The explicit social risk or potential for the outbreak of mass incidents is buried serious hidden trouble. When unable to resolve grievances will form social grievances through normal channels, while the area of social grievances accumulated to a certain extent, the event can cause people Public attention, arouse public resentment of the "fuse" event, will detonate the social contradictions, which evolved into mass incidents. At present, the local government ignored the grievances, ignore public interests, lack of necessary monitoring of sensitive events, or ignore the "fuse" event, or violence, so that some of this can be curbed or resolve the contradiction between the transformation upgrade, causing serious mass incidents. There is no direct current research group event "fuse" blocking mechanism, and the government also has some problems in dealing with the "fuse" event, which makes the construction of mass incidents "fuse" blocking mechanism has an important significance.
Based on literature review, case study and comparative research, this paper applies social combustion theory, conflict structure box theory and conflict blocking theory to analyze typical cases. On this basis, it puts forward effective countermeasures for blocking "fuse" of mass incidents.
First of all, the article on the mass incidents "fuse" blocking mechanism defines the overview and related concepts. This paper introduces the connotation of group events and "fuse" events, "the evolution of the types and characteristics of the fuse" event and "fuse" event for the four conditions of mass incidents are needed, which provide the social contradictions the burning material, the formation of public opinion "accelerant", "fuse" events caused by the "fire" government failure "firewall". This part is based on the mass incidents "fuse" blocking mechanism.
Secondly, the article on the "fuse" event of improper disposal were analyzed and the evolution of the typical case of group events. The Shishou incident, Tonghua blocking failure cases and events Shanghai building collapse, the successful handling of cases Dejiang incident analysis, analysis of changing process of "fuse" events, as well as the case reflected the "fuse" blocking mechanism of the existing problems, and provide empirical basis for the analysis of the next chapter.
Thirdly, the article analyzes the current situation of the block mechanism of mass incidents and analyzes the existing problems of the "fire line" blocking mode, which provides a basis for building a targeted blocking mechanism in the fifth part.
Finally, this paper puts forward constructing group event "fuse" blocking mechanism in nature. Based on the understanding of the "fuse" event, using the brewing and development of contradictions, to advance the link of blocking as much as possible. The specific measures include perfecting mechanism and system blocking, improve the ability to fuse "the government should" fuse "events, on-site disposal for different types of events, play the" fuse "non-governmental organizations as the third party platform communication and coordination function, improve people's consciousness of safeguarding their legal rights. In order to" fuse "events in the moment, preventing the upgrade and transformation of contradiction.

【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D631.43

【参考文献】