我国司法鉴定管理体制的改革与完善

发布时间：2018-03-18 00:40

本文选题：司法鉴定　切入点：司法鉴定管理权　出处：《湘潭大学》2007年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 随着现代科学技术的发展,在辨别案件事实真伪的方法上,司法鉴定已经占据了越来越重要的位置。在司法鉴定过程中主观的人为因素是左右鉴定结论的重要原因,所以改革司法鉴定制度其重点应放在对人员组织制度的改革上。虽然近年来我国的司法鉴定管理体制有了一定的进步,但是也还存在着许多问题。例如,鉴定机构繁多,缺乏统一管理;鉴定机构、鉴定人准入制度不完善,水平参差不齐等问题;所以出现了许多重复鉴定、多头鉴定、错误鉴定现象。针对于这些问题,全国人民代表大会常务委员会于2005年2月28日通过、颁布了《全国人大常委会关于司法鉴定管理问题的决定》(以下简称《决定》),《决定》的颁布实施无疑对我国司法鉴定工作起了巨大的推动作用。但是《决定》没有解决我国司法鉴定中的诸多问题,《决定》实施了一年多时间,现在逐步演变成了新的分散的司法管理体制,即司法部、公安部、最高人民检察院三机关的三套管理机制。文章对《决定》实施后的状况及现实意义作了一定评价,同时指出《决定》实施后尚未解决的有关管理体制问题。通过深入分析,文章认为我国的司法鉴定管理体制改革不能脱离客观实际。应统一、落实《决定》精神,由司法行政部门统一管理司法鉴定人和司法鉴定机构,对侦查机关的鉴定人、鉴定机构实行双重管理。同时完善与司法鉴定有关的法律制度,实现行业管理规范化。实现对鉴定人的责任制度,在鉴定机构内部形成权利义务对等。
[Abstract]:With the development of modern science and technology, judicial expertise has occupied a more and more important position in the method of distinguishing the truth and falsehood of cases. Therefore, the focus of the reform of the judicial expertise system should be on the reform of the personnel organization system. Although there has been some progress in the management system of judicial expertise in China in recent years, there are still many problems. For example, there are many appraisal institutions. Lack of unified management; identification institutions, appraisers access system is not perfect, the level is not uniform; so there have been a lot of repeated identification, long identification, false identification phenomenon. In view of these problems, Adopted by the standing Committee of the National people's Congress on February 28th 2005, The promulgation of the decision of the standing Committee of the National people's Congress on the Administration of Judicial expertise (hereinafter referred to as "decision") has undoubtedly played a great role in promoting the work of judicial expertise in China. To solve many problems in judicial expertise in China, the "decision" has been implemented for more than a year. Now it has gradually evolved into a new decentralized judicial management system, that is, three sets of management mechanisms of the three organs of the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Public Security, and the Supreme people's Procuratorate. At the same time, the paper points out that the relevant management system problems have not been solved after the implementation of the decision. Through in-depth analysis, the article holds that the reform of the judicial appraisal management system in our country cannot be divorced from the objective reality, and should be unified and implemented in the spirit of "decision". The judicial administrative department shall unify the management of judicial experts and judicial expertise institutions, and exercise dual management over experts and appraisal organs of investigative organs, and at the same time improve the legal system relating to judicial expertise, To realize the standardization of industry management, to realize the responsibility system to the appraiser, and to form the equivalence of rights and obligations within the appraisal organization.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：D918.9

【引证文献】