德宏州毒品犯罪的多维研究

发布时间：2018-03-21 12:24

本文选题：德宏州　切入点：毒品犯罪　出处：《华东政法大学》2008年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 德宏州因地处中缅边境,毗邻世界三大毒源地之一的“金三角”,成为了国际大毒枭垂涎的“白色通道”,也因此不可避免地成为了毒品重灾区,其境内的毒品犯罪活动较为猖獗。德宏州每年查获的海洛因数量基本上都占到了全国的四分之一左右,是中国乃至世界的毒品犯罪源头地之一,毒品犯罪的新特点、新趋势总是最先在这里得到表现,所以,德宏州的毒品犯罪具有一定的代表性。本文分为四个部分,从理论和实证、法律之内和法律之外等不同维度,运用大量的数据对德宏州的毒品犯罪问题进行了研究。第一部分考察了整个德宏州毒品危害的情况,并在此基础上分析了毒品犯罪屡禁不绝的原因;由于毒品犯罪态势严重,深深扎根于人们心中的“乱世用重典”的重刑化思想又再一次在打击毒品犯罪中得到了充分发挥,所以,第二部分从刑事政策、立法、司法、公众认可度等四个方面介绍了在打击毒品犯罪中“重刑化”思想的具体体现;在第三部分,文章承接第二部分,选择了实践中较为突出的两个问题即“零星贩毒”和“运输毒品”,从理论上分析了“重刑化”思想带来的困惑;此外通过大量的数据说明“重刑化”并没有带来毒品犯罪的必然减少;最后,在第四部分中笔者得出结论:乱世用重典非理性选择,并给出了立法和司法上的建议。立法上建议取消刑法第三百四十七条第一款,将毒品数量纳入定罪情节,此其一;其二,在对走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品犯罪在定罪时除采用数量标准外,还应该增加毒品犯罪的次数,对多次走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品的,不论数量多少,都应当入罪。司法上,鉴于目前取消运输毒品罪中的死刑的条件还不成熟,所以,实践中应当严格控制对运输毒品罪死刑的适用。同时,在第四部分,本文还将视野放到法律之外,从经济、教育、宣传和“替代种植”等方面给出了建议。禁毒是一个系统工程,仅凭借某一方面的力量是难以完成的。我们不能再迷信于“重刑化”的无所不能,只有对毒品的种植、制造、走私、贩卖、运输、吸食等多个环节多管齐下,综合治理才是禁绝毒品犯罪的必然选择。
[Abstract]:Because Dehong Prefecture is located on the border between China and Myanmar and is adjacent to one of the three major sources of drugs in the world, the "Golden Triangle" has become a "white channel" coveted by international drug lords, and thus inevitably has become a major drug disaster area. Drug crime activities are relatively rampant in its territory. Dehong prefecture has basically seized about 1/4 heroin each year, which is one of the sources of drug-related crimes in China and the world, and is a new characteristic of drug-related crimes. New trends are always the first to be manifested here, so the drug crime in Dehong is representative. This paper is divided into four parts: theoretical and empirical, within and outside the law. Using a large amount of data to study the drug crime problem in Dehong. The first part examines the drug harm situation in the whole state of Dehong, and on this basis analyzes the reasons for the repeated proscription of drug crime; because of the serious situation of drug crime, Deeply rooted in people's hearts, the heavy punishment thought of "using severe codes in troubled times" has once again been brought into full play in the fight against drug crimes. Therefore, the second part is from criminal policy, legislation, and justice. In the third part, the article carries on the second part. The author chooses two outstanding problems in practice, namely "sporadic drug trafficking" and "transporting drugs", and theoretically analyzes the confusion brought about by the thought of "severe punishment". In addition, through a great deal of data, it is shown that "severe punishment" does not bring about the inevitable decrease of drug crime. Finally, in the 4th part, the author concludes that the irrational choice of severe punishment in times of chaos. Legislative and judicial suggestions are given. In legislation, it is suggested that the first paragraph of Article 347th of the Criminal Law be abolished to include the quantity of drugs in the conviction plot. Second, in the case of smuggling, trafficking, and transportation, In addition to adopting a quantitative standard in the conviction of a drug-manufacturing crime, the number of drug-related crimes should also be increased. Whoever smuggles, sells, transports, or manufactures drugs many times, regardless of the quantity, shall be criminalized... in the administration of justice. In view of the fact that the conditions for abolishing the death penalty in the crime of transporting drugs are not yet ripe, the application of the death penalty for the crime of transporting drugs should be strictly controlled in practice. At the same time, in part 4th, this article also puts its vision beyond the law, from the perspective of economy and education. Propaganda and "alternative planting" are suggested. Drug control is a systematic project, and it is difficult to accomplish it by relying on the power of one side alone. We can no longer be superstitious in the omnipotence of "heavy punishment", only the cultivation and manufacture of drugs. Smuggling, trafficking, transportation, smoking and other links of multi-pronged, comprehensive control is the inevitable choice of drug crime.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D917

【引证文献】