当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 公安论文 >

论刑事法治视野下劳动教养制度

发布时间:2018-03-25 15:14

  本文选题:劳动教养 切入点:刑事法治 出处:《黑龙江大学》2005年硕士论文


【摘要】:刑事法治的核心就是人权保障,它的基本内容就是要求程序正义(即实体公正和程序公正)。本文试图以刑事法治为视角,通过对我国特有的劳动教养制度进行剖析比较研究,来寻求一条劳动教养制度变革之路,以期为我国的刑事法治建设提供有意的借鉴。 本文分四部分展开说,第一章从历史的角度,简要介绍和考察了我国劳动教养制度的发展沿革,并从适用对象、适用范围、期限、适用机关及适用程序等五个方面对劳动教养的现状进行了深入调查研究。第二章通过梳理劳动教养制度取得的历史和现实成效,肯定了其存在的合理性;但由于其实体、证据、程序三方面都存在合法性和正当性问题,有必要对其进行法治化和司法化改革。第三章是关于国外与劳动教养相关法律制度比较(保安处分、轻罪、少年司法)。通过比较,了解到这些制度在适用行为、对象和功能以及处置结果上,与我国劳动教养制度有一定的相似性,对于我国劳动教养制度的变革具有一定的借鉴意义。第四章是关于劳动教养的变革。通过对现有劳动教养实体上和程序上构想的比较和论证,重点阐述了笔者对劳动教养制度性质的重新界定及从对所涉实体上和程序上内容的具体设计,并通过评析提出我国劳动教养程序司法化改革的具体模式应为:公安机关提出申请,人民法院作出裁决,人民检察院予以监督,司法行政机关执行。
[Abstract]:The core of the criminal rule of law is the protection of human rights, and its basic content is to require procedural justice (i.e. substantive justice and procedural justice). To seek a way to reform the system of reeducation through labor, in order to provide an intentional reference for the construction of criminal rule of law in our country. This paper is divided into four parts. The first chapter briefly introduces and inspects the development and evolution of China's reeducation through labor system from the historical point of view, and from the object of application, the scope of application, the time limit, In chapter two, by combing the historical and practical achievements of the system of re-education through labor, the rationality of its existence is confirmed, but because of its entity, the evidence, There are problems of legality and legitimacy in all three aspects of procedure, so it is necessary to reform the rule of law and judicature. Chapter three deals with the comparison of foreign legal systems with reeducation through labour (security measures, misdemeanours, juvenile justice). Aware that these systems are similar to the system of reeducation through labour in our country in terms of their applicable acts, objects and functions and the results of their disposal, The fourth chapter is about the reform of reeducation through labor. The author focuses on the redefinition of the nature of the re-education through labour system and the concrete design of the substance and procedure involved. The concrete mode of the judicial reform of the procedure of reeducation through labor in China should be put forward through the analysis and analysis: the application of the public security organ, the decision of the people's court, the supervision of the people's procuratorate, and the execution of the judicial administrative organ.
【学位授予单位】:黑龙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2005
【分类号】:D926.8

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前9条

1 李颖红;保安处分与劳动教养制度的比较研究[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2004年05期

2 谭光定;将劳教纳入刑罚体系的总体思路[J];当代法学;2003年10期

3 沈福俊;关于废除劳动教养制度的思考[J];法学;1999年07期

4 衣永才,王毓忠,张彤;对劳动教养审批程序的见点思考[J];公安研究;2000年06期

5 赵均平,李瑛;从刑法设立卖淫嫖娼罪谈我国劳动教养制度的废止[J];检察实践;2000年06期

6 储槐植,汪永乐;再论我国刑法中犯罪概念的定量因素[J];法学研究;2000年02期

7 王尚新;关于刑法情节显著轻微规定的思考[J];法学研究;2001年05期

8 张学军;完善劳动教养适用程序的构想[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2004年05期

9 徐松林;保安处分及我国刑法制度的完善[J];现代法学;2001年04期



本文编号:1663680

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/gongan/1663680.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户8e038***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com