犯罪学语境下的中亚国际恐怖主义

发布时间：2018-04-20 16:43

本文选题：政治现实主义 + 犯罪学　；参考：《新疆大学》2005年硕士论文

【摘要】：语境分析法已经被广泛运用。语境作为一种“言说”的知识背景制约着“所说”的内涵与外延。因此,中亚国际恐怖主义在所谓“政治现实主义”语境和“犯罪学”语境中就会有不同的“意义”。在政治现实主义语境中,国家利益高于一切。因此,支持或打击在中亚国家的恐怖暴力活动就随着是否符合现实国家利益而定,这种语境中,恐怖活动成了国家谋取利益的手段,所以国家对类似的暴力恐怖活动表现出不同的态度,即所谓“双重标准”。把恐怖主义作为国际犯罪,就进入“犯罪学”语境。就中亚国际恐怖主义来说,从形式上看,它符合国际刑法的规定;从实质上看,它侵害了中亚各国人民的生活利益。所以,在犯罪学语境中,各国对中亚恐怖主义都有义务惩罚和防治。最后,中亚国际恐怖主义犯罪的成因是多方面的。从错误中学习,渐进性地前进就能遏制、防止国际恐怖主义。各国的反恐实践证明,把国际恐怖主义犯罪化有利于防治,是人类的理性选择。
[Abstract]:Contextual analysis has been widely used. Context, as a kind of knowledge background, restricts the connotation and extension of saying. Therefore, international terrorism in Central Asia has different meanings in the context of political realism and criminology. In the context of political realism, national interests take precedence. Therefore, to support or combat terrorist violence in Central Asian countries depends on whether it is in the interests of the real state. In this context, terrorist activities have become a means for the state to pursue its interests. So the state shows a different attitude toward similar violent terrorist activities, known as double standards. Regard terrorism as an international crime, enter the context of criminology. As far as international terrorism in Central Asia is concerned, it conforms to the provisions of international criminal law in formal terms, and in essence, it infringes on the living interests of the peoples of Central Asia. Therefore, in the context of criminology, all countries have the obligation to punish and prevent terrorism in Central Asia. Finally, the causes of international terrorism crime in Central Asia are various. Learning from mistakes and advancing incrementally can deter and prevent international terrorism. The anti-terrorism practice of various countries has proved that criminalizing international terrorism is a rational choice for mankind.
【学位授予单位】：新疆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：D917;D997.9

【相似文献】