“侦审一体化”的理论与实践

发布时间：2018-04-30 23:00

本文选题：刑侦改革 + 侦审一体化　；参考：《公安大学学报》2000年06期

【摘要】：“侦审一体化”也称“侦审合一” ,是指刑事案件侦查职能与预审职能合并 ,由刑事侦查部门统一行使并承担责任的刑事侦查工作体制。其是有法学理论基础的 :符合诉讼公正的价值目标 ;符合诉讼效益原则。现实必要性 :能够适应社会主义市场经济体制的要求 ;能够充分合理利用有限的侦查力量 ;是精简机构改革趋势的必然要求。取得的成效 :在一定程度上缓解了警力紧张的问题 ;刑警的证据意识增强 ,办案质量明显提高 ;办案节奏加快 ,效率提高 ;刑警素质正在逐渐提高。当前困扰“侦审一体化”进程几个问题的分析 :关于“侦审一体化”是否符合有关的具体法律规定问题 ,不能教条地理解刑事诉讼法第90条的规定 ;刑事诉讼法是揭露、证实和惩罚犯罪的基本法律规范 ,具体到一个机构应设几个或何种部门 ,不会作出具体规定 ;由刑事诉讼法第 3条和第 90条 ,也不能推导出预审必须单设一个部门和“侦审分立”的结论。关于“侦审一体化”是否影响办案质量 ,降低打击力度问题 ,不是“侦审一体化”工作体制的必然结果。关于“侦审一体化”是否符合国家权力运行机制要求问题 ,国家权力运行机制的最基本特点是统一性而并非“分权”和“制约” ,“分权、制约理论”和“侦审分立”并无直接和必然的联系。对策思考 :进一步提高认识 ;
[Abstract]:"Integration of investigation and trial", also called "the unity of investigation and trial", refers to the criminal investigation work system which combines the function of criminal investigation with the function of preliminary examination and is carried out by the criminal investigation department in a unified manner. It is based on the theory of law: accord with the value goal of litigation justice and accord with the principle of litigation benefit. The necessity of reality: to be able to meet the requirements of the socialist market economic system; to be able to make full and reasonable use of limited investigative power; is an inevitable requirement for streamlining the trend of institutional reform. Achievements: to a certain extent, the problem of police tension has been alleviated; the evidence consciousness of criminal police has been strengthened and the quality of handling cases has been obviously improved; the pace of handling cases has been quickened and the efficiency has been improved; the quality of criminal police is gradually improving. An analysis of several problems currently besetting the process of "investigation and trial integration": whether "investigation and trial integration" conforms to the relevant specific legal provisions, the provisions of Article 90 of the Criminal procedure Law cannot be understood in a dogmatic manner, and the Criminal procedure Law is to expose, The basic legal norms establishing and punishing crimes, which are specific to the number or types of departments that an institution should have, and which will not be specified; by articles 3 and 90 of the Code of Criminal procedure, Nor can we deduce the conclusion that a separate department must be set up for the preliminary examination and that the investigation and trial should be separated. Whether the integration of investigation and trial affects the quality of handling cases and reduces the degree of crackdown is not the inevitable result of the work system of "investigation and trial integration". As to whether "investigation and trial integration" conforms to the requirements of state power operation mechanism, the most basic characteristic of state power operation mechanism is unity, not "separation of powers" and "restriction", "separation of powers", "separation of powers", "separation of powers", and "separation of powers". There is no direct and necessary connection between the theory of restriction and the separation of investigation and trial. Countermeasures: to further improve the understanding;
【分类号】：D631

【相似文献】