侵犯知识产权犯罪追诉乏力现象之研究
发布时间:2018-05-14 05:01
本文选题:侵犯知识产权犯罪 + 追诉乏力 ; 参考:《湘潭大学》2006年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着经济全球化的快步推进,国际交往的日益密切,知识经济时代的霍然来临,知识产权的重要性无可争议地凸现出来。保护知识产权已经成为提高国家竞争力的重要内容,成为当今世界的潮流。 我国对于知识产权的保护,包括司法保护与行政保护两种方式。但就现状而言,我国对知识产权的保护却未达到应有的高度,尤其是对知识产权的刑事保护明显缺乏力度,实践中普遍存在知识产权行政保护强于刑事保护的情况,很多应当构成知识产权犯罪的行为没有依法受到追诉。这与现实领域发生的大量知识产权违法案件,以及知识产权对于社会经济的贡献相比而言,是极不相称的。其一大后果就是知识产权违法行为愈演愈烈,严重侵害了知识产权所有人的合法利益。知识产权保护不力甚至已经成为我国融入世界经济潮流的一大羁绊。究其原因,主要有二:一方面,某些知识产权行政管理机关对于应当构成犯罪的知识产权违法行为没有依法进行移送,“以罚代刑”情况严重。另一方面,有关司法机关对于知识产权犯罪偏好降格处理,能判不判,重罪轻判。其深层次的原因与知识产权行政执法机关的财政缺乏保障、有关部门的监督不力、立法体系的疏漏、知识产权刑事保护的意识薄弱因素等密切相关。 因此,要从根本上解决侵犯知识产权犯罪刑事追诉乏力这一问题,就要更新观念,重视对知识产权的刑事保护,坚决打击行政执法机关的“以罚代刑”等不法行为,对构成知识产权犯罪的行为应依法予以追究。只有这样,才能最大程度地打击知识产权犯罪人的嚣张气焰,从而更好地保护知识产权所有人的利益,为建设创新型国家贡献应有的力量。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economic globalization and the increasingly close international contacts, the importance of intellectual property rights has emerged indisputably in the coming era of knowledge economy. The protection of intellectual property rights has become an important part of improving national competitiveness and the trend of the world today. The protection of intellectual property in our country includes judicial protection and administrative protection. However, as far as the present situation is concerned, the protection of intellectual property in our country has not reached its due height, especially the criminal protection of intellectual property is obviously lacking in strength. In practice, the administrative protection of intellectual property is generally stronger than that of criminal protection. Many acts that should constitute intellectual property crimes have not been prosecuted according to law. This is not commensurate with the large number of intellectual property violation cases and the contribution of intellectual property rights to social economy. One of its major consequences is that intellectual property rights violations become more and more serious, which seriously infringes the legitimate interests of intellectual property owners. Weak protection of intellectual property rights has even become a major fetters of China's integration into the world economic trend. There are two main reasons: on the one hand, some intellectual property administrative organs have not transferred the intellectual property illegal acts which should constitute a crime according to the law, and the situation of "substitute punishment with punishment" is serious. On the other hand, the judicial authorities tend to reduce their preference for intellectual property crimes, and can sentence no or felony. The deep reasons are closely related to the lack of financial protection of the administrative law enforcement agencies of intellectual property rights, the weak supervision of relevant departments, the omission of the legislative system, the weak awareness of criminal protection of intellectual property rights, and so on. Therefore, in order to fundamentally solve the problem of weak criminal prosecution for crimes against intellectual property rights, it is necessary to renew the concept, attach importance to the criminal protection of intellectual property rights, and resolutely crack down on illegal acts such as "punishment instead of punishment" by administrative law enforcement agencies. Any act constituting an intellectual property crime shall be investigated according to law. Only in this way can we strike at the arrogance of intellectual property offenders to the greatest extent, thus better protect the interests of intellectual property owners and contribute to the building of an innovative country.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2006
【分类号】:D917;D924.3
【引证文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 蒲江涛;;论民事诉讼中的调解与地方保护主义[J];理论导报;2010年10期
,本文编号:1886428
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/gongan/1886428.html