诱惑侦查法律问题初探

发布时间：2018-05-27 06:44

本文选题：诱惑侦查 + 诉讼价值　；参考：《四川大学》2003年硕士论文

【摘要】： 近年来，诱惑侦查作为一种侦查手段已经在我国侦查部门得到运用。但围绕诱惑侦查的争论可谓众说纷纭、莫衷一是。诱惑侦查，是刑事诉讼中一种特殊的侦查手段，其不当适用可能导致侦查陷阱。在美国判例法上，从对侦查陷阱的宽容态度到“陷阱之法理”再到“正当程序抗辩”，围绕诱惑侦查的合法性问题，演绎了规制侦查权的艰难历程，折射出侦查程序中关注人权保障的深层底蕴、由此得到启示，我国目前实践中诱惑侦查的无序状态也亟待法律规范。从本质上讲，，诱惑侦查的运用具有非法性、非理性，它不仅与刑事诉讼的活动规律、法治原则相悖，而且可能带来一系列弊端，不利于保障公民的合法权益。具体应遵循以下几项原则：主体合法原则；必要性原则；报告及审批原则；引诱对象非特定性原则；诱饵适当原则；消极行为原则；严格监督原则；有效控制原则；责任制原则。在判断诱惑侦查合法性的标准上，文章提出了以客观标准为主，主观标准为辅的观点。主张首先看诱惑者客观上是否采取了诱惑他人犯罪的行为，此种诱导行为本身是否合法，原则上应以此来界定诱惑侦查行为是否合法。只有在特殊情况下，才能允许使用主观标准来进行判定。由于诱惑侦查具有极大的危险性，一旦适用不当，容易陷人于罪，因此，诱惑侦查的立法建构应当对其适用范围、适用对象，审批程序等进行严格的控制。
[Abstract]:In recent years, seductive investigation as an investigative technique has been used in our investigation department. But the argument around enticement investigation can be said to have different opinions and different opinions. Enticement investigation is a special investigative technique in criminal procedure, and its improper application may lead to investigation trap. In the case law of the United States, from the tolerant attitude towards the investigation trap to the legal principle of the trap and then to the defense of due process, it deduces the difficult course of regulating the investigation power around the legality of the enticement investigation. It reflects the deep information of paying attention to the protection of human rights in the procedure of investigation, and thus gets the enlightenment. The disordered state of enticement investigation in our country's current practice is also urgent to be regulated by law. In essence, the application of enticement investigation is illegal and irrational. It is not only contrary to the law of criminal procedure and the principle of rule by law, but also may bring a series of malpractices, which is not conducive to the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of citizens. The following principles should be followed: the principle of subject legality; the principle of necessity; the principle of reporting and examination and approval; the principle of non-specificity of enticing object; the principle of appropriate bait; the principle of negative behavior; the principle of strict supervision; the principle of effective control; Principle of accountability On the criterion of judging the legality of enticement investigation, this paper puts forward the viewpoint that objective standard is the main criterion and subjective standard is auxiliary. The author holds that the first step is whether the seducer has taken the act of inducing others to commit a crime, and whether such inducement is legal, in principle, to define whether the act of enticement investigation is lawful or not. Only in exceptional circumstances can subjective criteria be allowed. Because of the great danger of seductive investigation, it is easy to get caught in crime if it is not applied properly. Therefore, the legislative construction of seduction investigation should strictly control its scope of application, applicable object, examination and approval procedure, etc.
【学位授予单位】：四川大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2003
【分类号】：D918

【参考文献】