论鉴定意见质证程序的完善

发布时间：2018-05-28 14:18

本文选题：鉴定 + 鉴定意见　；参考：《燕山大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：质证是司法证明的基本环节之一，作为诉讼当事人的重要权利，它对于司法的公正公平作用巨大。而鉴定意见是特定的当事人运用专业的知识或技能就某一事实做出的推理意见，这种意见的专业性及其对法官判断产生的影响使鉴定意见的充分质证显得尤为重要。而构建完整的鉴定意见质证程序则是鉴定意见充分有效质证的必要前提，本篇论文对如何完善鉴定意见质证程序进行了研究，文章总共分为五个大部分：第一部分是绪论，这一部分主要叙述了文章的研究背景、目的及意义、国内外研究现状和具体的研究方法；第二部分是鉴定意见概述，这一部分主要介绍了关于鉴定意见质证的基本理论，如鉴定意见的证据力和证据效力，鉴定意见质证的重要性，鉴定意见质证的主体及具体内容；第三部分是鉴定意见质证的域外考察。文章对大陆法系国家中的德国、法国、日本以及英美法系国家的美国和英国的鉴定意见质证程序进行了具体考察并简要评析。然后，通过对比两大法系国家鉴定意见质证程序，得出了关于完善我国鉴定意见质证程序的启示；第四个部分首先概括了我国鉴定意见质证的立法现状，然后总结出了我国的鉴定意见质证程序存在的问题，，并对这些问题产生的原因进行了分析；第五部分是文章的最后一部分，也是核心部分，主要是针对我国鉴定意见质证程序存在的问题，对如何完善我国鉴定意见质证程序提出了具体的建议。
[Abstract]:As an important right of litigant, cross-examination is one of the basic links of judicial proof. The expert opinion is the reasoning opinion made by a particular party on a certain fact by using professional knowledge or skill. The professionalism of this opinion and its influence on the judge's judgment make the full cross-examination of the appraisal opinion particularly important. The construction of a complete appraisal opinion cross-examination procedure is a necessary prerequisite for the full and effective cross-examination of appraisal opinions. This paper studies how to improve the process of cross-examination of appraisal opinions, which is divided into five parts: The first part is the introduction, this part mainly narrates the research background, the purpose and the significance, the domestic and foreign research present situation and the concrete research method; the second part is the appraisal opinion summary, This part mainly introduces the basic theory about the identification opinion cross-examination, such as the evidence power and the evidence effect of the appraisal opinion, the importance of the appraisal opinion cross-examination, the main body and the concrete content of the appraisal opinion cross-examination. The third part is the overseas investigation of cross-examination of appraisal opinions. This paper makes a concrete investigation of the cross-examination procedures of the appraisal opinions of Germany, France, Japan and the United States and the United Kingdom in the countries of civil law system. Then, by comparing the identification opinion cross-examination procedures of the two legal system countries, the author draws the enlightenment of perfecting the identification opinion cross-examination procedure in China. The fourth part summarizes the legislative status quo of the authentication opinion cross-examination in our country. Then it summarizes the problems existing in the process of cross-examination of appraisal opinions in our country, and analyzes the causes of these problems. The fifth part is the last part of the article, which is also the core part. Aiming at the problems existing in the process of cross-examination of appraisal opinions in our country, the paper puts forward some concrete suggestions on how to perfect the procedure of cross-examination of appraisal opinions in China.
【学位授予单位】：燕山大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D918.9

【参考文献】