多头鉴定、重复鉴定、鉴定分歧问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-18 19:54

本文选题：多头鉴定 + 重复鉴定　；参考：《四川大学》2006年硕士论文

【摘要】： 由于我国鉴定体制及立法的不足，在当前鉴定体制弊端诸现的情况下，多头鉴定、重复鉴定、鉴定分歧问题日益突出，重新鉴定没有发挥其在司法实践中应有的功能，当事人对司法鉴定结论产生怀疑，损害司法的公信力，同时严重影响法官对司法鉴定结论的审查和采信，导致判决结果的不公正，致使案件久拖不决，影响诉讼效率的实现，也不利于司法改革的深化。在实现司法公正，提高司法效率思想理念指导下，，本文从多头鉴定、重复鉴定、鉴定分歧的积极意义和面临的问题出发，初步分析了我国司法鉴定体制中鉴定人、鉴定启动机制、鉴定标准、鉴定程序、鉴定的质证制度等几方面存在的问题，从司法鉴定的概念、性质、特点入手，提出了多头鉴定、重复鉴定、鉴定分歧的原因有；鉴定机构和鉴定人、启动主体、委托主体、鉴定标准、质证制度、违法鉴定责任追究制度等方面的原因。从改革现行鉴定体制出发，试探性地提出了自己一些不成熟的改革意见，从理性构建适合我国的司法鉴定制度的角度，力求探讨减少、消除、解决“多头鉴定、重复鉴定、鉴定分歧”问题之策略。主要从建立完善司法鉴定人资格认证、规范鉴定启动程序和委托程序、对鉴定机构和鉴定人行使监督和管理、完善司法鉴定质证制度、建全违法鉴定责任追究制度、统一和完善鉴定标准等七个方面提出了改革建议和观点，以提高司法鉴定的质量，减少多头鉴定、重复鉴定和鉴定分歧的产生，促进司法公正和效率。
[Abstract]:Because of the deficiency of the appraisal system and legislation in our country, under the condition of the malpractice of the current appraisal system, the problems of multiple appraisal, repeated appraisal and appraisal divergence are becoming more and more prominent, and the reappraisal does not play its due function in the judicial practice. The parties doubt the conclusion of judicial expertise, damage the credibility of the judiciary, at the same time seriously affect the judge's examination and acceptance of the conclusion of judicial expertise, lead to the unjust outcome of the judgment, cause the case to procrastinate, affect the realization of the efficiency of litigation. Also not conducive to the deepening of judicial reform. Under the guidance of the idea of realizing judicial justice and improving judicial efficiency, this paper analyzes the connoisseur in the judicial appraisal system of our country, starting from the positive significance and problems of multi-head identification, repeated identification and appraisal differences. The problems existing in the mechanism, standard, procedure and system of cross-examination of identification are discussed in this paper. Starting with the concept, nature and characteristics of judicial identification, the author puts forward the reasons for the differences between multiple identification, repeated identification and identification. The reasons of identification institution and appraiser, starting subject, entrusting subject, appraising standard, cross-examination system, investigating system of illegal appraisal liability, etc. Starting from the reform of the current appraisal system, this paper tentatively puts forward some immature reform opinions, and from the angle of rationally constructing the judicial appraisal system suitable for our country, tries to explore the reduction, elimination and solution of "long appraisal and repeated identification". Strategies for identifying divisive issues. It mainly includes establishing and perfecting the qualification certification of judicial experts, standardizing the procedures for initiating and entrusting identification, exercising supervision and management over appraisal institutions and experts, perfecting the system of cross-examination of judicial identification, and establishing a complete system for investigating the liability for illegal identification. In order to improve the quality of judicial expertise, reduce the emergence of multiple identification, repeat identification and identify differences, and promote judicial justice and efficiency, this paper puts forward reform suggestions and viewpoints in seven aspects, such as unifying and perfecting the standard of identification.
【学位授予单位】：四川大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：D926;D918.9

【引证文献】