吸毒者的归因方式、应对方式与复吸的关系

发布时间：2018-06-22 14:05

本文选题：吸毒者 + 归因方式　；参考：《西北师范大学》2008年硕士论文

【摘要】： 长期以来,吸毒者的身心健康受到毒品的严重危害,导致他们在看待和理解问题时存在一定的认知偏差,在解决和处理问题时会采取一些不恰当的应对方式。已有研究表明,吸毒者的归因方式与应对方式是影响其复吸的关键因素。但目前国内尚未有研究深入探讨过吸毒者的归因方式、应对方式与复吸之间的内在关系,更无有效测量吸毒者归因方式的工具。本研究以吸毒者为研究对象,在参阅已有文献和访谈的基础上,编制了吸毒者归因方式问卷,并采用问卷调查法和访谈法相结合,初步探讨了吸毒者的归因方式、应对方式与复吸之间的关系。通过研究得出如下结论: (1)吸毒者归因方式问卷具有良好的信、效度,可以作为测量吸毒者归因方式的有效工具。该问卷共16项生活事件,其中积极事件与消极事件各8项,并将归因方式划分为部位性、稳定性、整体性三个维度。 (2)吸毒者在归因方式上存在显著的性别差异,与女性吸毒者相比,男性吸毒者的归因方式更为消极;吸毒者在归因方式上存在显著的文化程度差异,在对消极事件进行归因时,文化程度低的吸毒者更倾向于做出稳定的归因,而文化程度高的吸毒者则更倾向于做出不稳定的归因。 (3)吸毒者对戒毒成功这一事件的归因方式,在性别和文化程度上差异不显著,只在复吸次数上差异显著,随着复吸次数的增加,吸毒者对戒毒成功进行归因时更倾向于做外在的、不稳定的、局部的归因。 (4)吸毒者在应对方式上存在显著的性别差异,在回归社会问题上以及家庭问题上,男性吸毒者都更倾向于采取消极的应对方式,而女性吸毒者则更倾向于采取积极的应对方式;吸毒者在应对方式上文化程度差异不显著。 (5)吸毒者的归因方式与复吸存在显著差异,随着复吸次数的增加,吸毒者的归因方式越来越消极。 (6)吸毒者的应对方式与复吸存在显著差异,随着复吸次数的增加,吸毒者的所采取的应对方式越来越的消极。 (7)吸毒者的归因方式与应对方式存在显著差异,归因方式可以预测应对方式,具有积极归因方式的吸毒者倾向于采用积极的应对方式,而具有消极归因方式的吸毒者则倾向于采用消极的应对方式,其中归因方式的部位性和稳定性维度对应对方式具有显著地预测作用。
[Abstract]:For a long time, the physical and mental health of drug addicts is seriously endangered by drugs, which leads them to have certain cognitive deviations when they look at and understand the problems, and will take some inappropriate coping methods when solving and dealing with the problems. Previous studies have shown that the attribution style and coping style of drug addicts are the key factors affecting relapse. However, there is no domestic research on the attribution style of drug users, the internal relationship between coping style and relapse, and there is no effective tool to measure the attribution style of drug addicts. Based on the literature and interviews, the questionnaire of attribution style of drug users is compiled, and the attribution style of drug users is preliminarily discussed by combining questionnaire with interview. The relationship between coping style and relapse. The conclusions are as follows: (1) the questionnaire has good reliability and validity and can be used as an effective tool to measure the attribution style of drug users. The questionnaire included 16 life events, including 8 positive events and 8 negative events, and the attribution style was classified as partial and stable. Three dimensions of integrality. (2) there are significant gender differences in attribution styles of drug users, and male drug users have more negative attribution styles than female drug users; There are significant differences in the way of attribution among drug users. When attributing negative events, the drug users with low education tend to make stable attribution. However, the highly educated drug users tend to make unstable attribution. (3) there is no significant difference in the way drug addicts attribute to the success of detoxification in terms of gender and educational level. The difference was significant only in the number of relapse. With the increase of relapse times, drug addicts were more inclined to do external and unstable factors when attributing their success to drug addiction. Local attribution. (4) there were significant gender differences in coping styles among drug users, and male drug users were more likely to adopt negative coping styles on social issues and family issues. However, female drug addicts tend to adopt positive coping styles, and there is no significant difference in coping styles. (5) there are significant differences between attribution styles and relapse patterns of drug addicts, and with the increase of relapse times, there are significant differences between them. (6) there were significant differences between coping styles of drug users and relapse, with the increase of relapse times, The coping styles of drug users are becoming more and more negative. (7) there are significant differences between the attribution styles and coping styles of drug users, and attribution styles can predict coping styles. Drug users with positive attribution styles tend to adopt positive coping styles, while drug users with negative attribution styles tend to adopt negative coping styles. The dimensionality of location and stability of attribution style has a significant predictive effect on coping style.
【学位授予单位】：西北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D917

【引证文献】