论我国民事司法鉴定结论的证据审查

发布时间：2018-06-24 21:04

本文选题：司法鉴定结论 + 审查　；参考：《苏州大学》2007年硕士论文

【摘要】： 司法鉴定结论是一种重要的证据表现形式,但司法鉴定结论并不具有高于其它证据形式的证明力和证据能力。司法鉴定结论的基本概念和特征、证据属性与诉讼功能,以及各种司法鉴定结论之间不可避免的矛盾与冲突,均决定司法鉴定结论之审查与判断的必要性。最高人民法院《关于民事诉讼证据规则的若干规定》第二十九条对鉴定书的审查作了规定,审判人员对鉴定人出具的鉴定书,应当审查鉴定的依据、使用的科学技术手段及对鉴定过程的说明。但是对于如何去审查、判断和采纳却没有具体规定,以至于法官在办案过程中排除或采信司法鉴定结论没有可以依赖的标准,面对专门知识的不同意见时,也不知该如何取舍。在审判实践中法官对司法鉴定结论的态度走向了两个极端,一个是法官对鉴定结论的盲从,不加分析,一律采信。另一个是无限制重复鉴定使案件久拖不决。法官对于司法鉴定结论这类涉及专门知识的特殊证据究竟该如何进行审查并采信,已经成为一个非常值得研究的问题。因此,本文着重从剖析我国民事司法鉴定结论审查判断在立法与实践中长期存在的问题以及成因入手,运用司法鉴定结论的基础理论,并借鉴两大法系对司法鉴定结论审查之长,努力寻求构建和完善符合中国国情的民事司法鉴定结论之审查判断制度,从而达到准确认定事实,公正处理案件的司法公正目标。
[Abstract]:The conclusion of judicial expertise is an important form of evidence, but the conclusion of judicial expertise is not superior to other forms of evidence in the power of proof and the ability of evidence. The basic concept and characteristics of the conclusion of judicial expertise, the attribute of evidence and the function of litigation, as well as the inevitable contradiction and conflict among various conclusions of judicial expertise, all decide the necessity of the examination and judgment of the conclusion of judicial expertise. Article 29 of the Supreme people's Court on the rules of evidence in Civil Proceedings provides for the examination of expert certificates. Scientific and technical means used and description of the identification process. However, there are no specific provisions on how to review, judge and adopt, so that judges do not have the standard to rely on in the process of handling cases, and they do not know how to choose and choose when facing different opinions of specialized knowledge. In the trial practice, the judge's attitude towards the conclusion of judicial expertise moves to two extremes. One is the judge's blind adherence to the conclusion of judicial expertise. The other is the indefinite repeated identification that prolongs the case. How to examine and accept the special evidence involving expertise has become a problem worth studying. Therefore, this paper focuses on the analysis of the long-standing problems and causes in the legislation and practice of the review and judgment of the conclusion of civil judicial expertise in China, and applies the basic theory of the conclusion of judicial expertise. And draw lessons from the strong points of the two legal systems to review the conclusion of judicial expertise, and try to build and perfect the system of examination and judgment of the conclusion of civil judicial expertise in accordance with the national conditions of China, so as to achieve the objective of accurately identifying the facts and handling cases fairly.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：D925.13;D918.9

【相似文献】