当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 公安论文 >

讯问功能视野下侦查讯问制度研究

发布时间:2018-06-26 22:45

  本文选题:侦查讯问 + 功能 ; 参考:《华东政法大学》2013年硕士论文


【摘要】:完善的侦查讯问制度一直以来都是学者们积极探索和追求的目标。而一项完善的侦查讯问制度必然是体现了侦查讯问功能并很好地实现和发挥了侦查讯问功能,为此研究侦查讯问制度应以实现和发挥侦查讯问功能为研究视角。本文就尝试以侦查讯问功能为视角,为我国侦查讯问制度的完善提供思路。本文基本内容如下: 第一部分:简要介绍侦查讯问功能的基本理念包括:侦查讯问功能的概念、特征及侦查讯问同相关概念的简要辨析,借此明晰侦查讯问功能的概念。最终得出侦查讯问功能的概念是指侦查讯问在讯问过程中同外部环境相联系的过程中所产生的一种积极作用。 第二部分:主要介绍侦查讯问功能的主要内容,依据侦查讯问作用对象的不同,侦查讯问功能可分为:对个人的功能、对侦查活动的功能、对犯罪预防的功能。对个人的功能指的是侦查讯问制度和活动对不同的个人所可能具有的积极作用;其中对个人的功能可以进一步细分为对犯罪嫌疑人的功能,对社会大众的功能。对侦查活动的功能是指侦查讯问制度和活动对具体案件的侦查活动所可能具有的积极作用。对犯罪预防的功能是指侦查讯问制度和活动中所附加的对犯罪预防所可能具有的积极作用。 第三部分:主要是以侦查讯问功能是否得到实现和发挥为衡量侦查讯问制度的标尺,简要分析现行制度的可取与不足之处,并简要分析侦查讯问制度存在不足的原因。 第四部分:结合第三部分分析得出侦查讯问制度存在的不足及其原因,以实现和发挥侦查讯问功能为目标,针对我国现行侦查讯问制度提出完善建议:首先是树立侦查讯问制度构建的三大基本理念,包括:一是全面认识侦查讯问功能,二是平等对待侦查讯问各功能,三是有利于侦查讯问功能实现;其次是针对现行侦查讯问制度的不足构建四大制度、机制来完善现行侦查讯问制度,包括:一是构建鼓励犯罪嫌疑人积极供述制度,,二是构建非法讯问方法防范制度,三是构建侦查讯问及时总结机制,四是构建侦查讯问参与犯罪预防机制。
[Abstract]:Perfect investigation and interrogation system has always been the goal that scholars actively explore and pursue. A perfect system of investigation and interrogation must embody the function of investigation and interrogation and realize and exert the function of investigation and interrogation. Therefore, the research of investigation and interrogation system should take the realization and exertion of the function of investigation and interrogation as the research angle. This paper tries to provide ideas for the perfection of investigation and interrogation system from the angle of investigation and interrogation function. The basic contents of this paper are as follows: the first part: briefly introduces the basic concepts of the function of investigation and interrogation, including: the concept of the function of investigation and interrogation, the characteristics and the brief discrimination and analysis of the related concepts of the function of investigation and interrogation. In order to clarify the concept of investigative interrogation function. Finally, the concept of investigative interrogation function is defined as an active role of investigation interrogation in the process of connection with external environment. The second part mainly introduces the main contents of the function of investigation and interrogation. According to the different object of investigation and interrogation, the function of investigation and interrogation can be divided into three parts: the function of individual, the function of investigative activity and the function of crime prevention. The function of the individual refers to the positive effect of the investigation and interrogation system and activities on different individuals, in which the function of the individual can be further subdivided into the function of the criminal suspect and the function of the public. The function of investigation refers to the positive role that the investigation and interrogation system and activities may have on the investigation of specific cases. The function of crime prevention refers to the possible positive effect of the system and activities of investigation and interrogation on crime prevention. The third part is mainly based on whether the function of investigation and interrogation has been realized and played as a yardstick to measure the system of investigation and interrogation, briefly analyzes the desirability and deficiency of the current system, and briefly analyzes the reasons for the insufficiency of the system of investigation and interrogation. The fourth part: combined with the third part of the analysis of the system of investigation interrogation and its reasons, with the goal of realizing and giving play to the function of investigation and interrogation. In view of the current investigation and interrogation system in our country, some suggestions are put forward: first, to establish three basic concepts of the construction of investigation and interrogation system, including: first, to fully understand the function of investigation and interrogation, and second, to treat all functions of investigation and interrogation equally. The third is conducive to the realization of the function of investigation and interrogation; secondly, four systems should be constructed to improve the current investigation and interrogation system, including: first, to build up the system of encouraging criminal suspects to give statements actively. The second is to construct the prevention system of illegal interrogation methods, the third is to construct the mechanism of prompt summing up of investigation interrogation, and the fourth is to construct the criminal prevention mechanism of investigation and interrogation participation.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D918

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前7条

1 刘品新;对抗讯问的行为类型浅析[J];新疆公安司法管理干部学院学报;2001年02期

2 潘强,周伟良;论侦查讯问中犯罪嫌疑人的权利保障[J];新疆警官高等专科学校学报;2005年01期

3 谢菲;徐锐利;;论侦查预审工作中的犯罪嫌疑人激励机制[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2010年12期

4 卢节来;;“零口供”相关问题研究[J];森林公安;2012年04期

5 刘冲;;论刑事诉讼法修正案对侦查讯问制度的完善[J];铁道警官高等专科学校学报;2012年03期

6 柯昌林;;犯罪嫌疑人供述临界心理的形成与转化[J];云南警官学院学报;2009年04期

7 朱立恒;;腐败犯罪案件侦查制度所面临的挑战及其应对[J];政法论坛;2010年03期



本文编号:2071676

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/gongan/2071676.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户18de8***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com