论我国社区矫正的性质

发布时间：2018-07-04 21:56

本文选题：社区矫正 + 刑罚执行方法　；参考：《中南大学》2007年硕士论文

【摘要】： 社区矫正作为一种移植并大量借鉴于国外的刑罚制度,在我国还是一种新的尝试。要完全地与我国现有的刑罚制度相融合,需要不断的实践和探索,有关部门和学者们对于这一问题进行了大量的研究,并取得了丰硕的成果。但是关于社区矫正性质缺乏专门的论证,因而无法揭示社区矫正性质对制度设置影响。根据国外社区矫正发展的历史以及现状,可以得知社区矫正主要表现为刑罚种类和刑罚执行方法两种形式。在我国,关于社区矫正的性质的确定,存在分歧,主要还包括了“保安处分说”、“社会工作说”、“替代措施说”等观点。这些观点在认定社区矫正性质上都缺乏合理性。而争议的焦点主要集中在是刑种还是刑罚执行方法上。在我国,将社区矫正作为刑罚执行方法是符合我国的实际需要的,在理论上也是成立的。作为刑罚执行方法的社区矫正必然与原有刑罚制度发生联系。一般而言,社区矫正以刑罚的判处为前提,这实际上就界定了社区矫正的范围。不能够任意地扩展社区矫正的适用范围,以免滥用。而我国现行制度中将暂予监外执行纳入社区矫正的范围也是不合理的。社区矫正作为刑罚的执行方法还具有改善和实现刑罚功能的意义。在刑罚种类保持相对稳定的情形下,改革刑罚执行方法对于迎合刑罚理念的转变具有重要意义。在确定了社区矫正的性质以后,应当在制度设置上与性质相符合。我国现行的很多社区矫正制度中,存在着与社区矫正性质不符合的内容。应当设立统一的执行机关,不应将原本统一的刑罚执行活动人为地割裂开来由两个或多个主体实施。而社区矫正作为执行方法,不能够由法院决定实施,而应当由具体执行机关在对犯罪人进行充分考察的基础上决定实施,需要建立合理的程序对社区矫正的决定和实施进行规范。
[Abstract]:Community correction as a transplant and a large number of foreign penalty system, in our country is a new attempt. In order to integrate completely with the existing penalty system of our country, it is necessary to practice and explore continuously. The relevant departments and scholars have carried out a great deal of research on this issue, and have achieved fruitful results. But there is no special argumentation about the nature of community correction, so it can not reveal the influence of community correction on system setting. According to the history and present situation of the development of community correction in foreign countries, we can know that the main forms of community correction are penalty types and penalty execution methods. In our country, there are differences about the nature of community correction, including "security measures theory", "social work theory", "alternative measures theory" and so on. These viewpoints are lack of rationality in determining the nature of community correction. The focus of the dispute is mainly on the type of punishment or the execution of punishment. In our country, community correction as a penalty execution method is in line with the actual needs of our country, in theory is also true. Community correction, as a penalty execution method, must be connected with the original penalty system. Generally speaking, community correction is based on punishment, which actually defines the scope of community correction. The scope of application of community correction cannot be expanded arbitrarily to avoid abuse. It is also unreasonable to include the temporary execution outside the prison into the community correction in the current system of our country. Community correction, as the execution method of penalty, also has the significance of improving and realizing the penalty function. Under the condition that the type of penalty remains relatively stable, it is of great significance to reform the method of penalty execution in order to meet the change of penalty concept. After determining the nature of community correction, the system should be in accordance with the nature. In many current community correction systems in China, there are some contents which are inconsistent with the nature of community correction. A unified executive organ should be set up, and the original unified penalty enforcement activities should not be artificially separated by two or more subjects. As an enforcement method, community correction cannot be decided by the court, but should be decided by the specific enforcement organ on the basis of the full investigation of the offender. It is necessary to establish reasonable procedures to regulate the decision and practice of community correction.
【学位授予单位】：中南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：D926.8

【引证文献】