论刑事讯问笔录中虚假陈述的识别
发布时间：2018-07-31 18:02
【摘要】： 谎言识别一直是西方法学界和心理学界研究的热点和焦点问题。在刑事询问笔录中,证人供述的真实性或虚假性对于能否成功破案及证据能否被法庭采纳具有至关重要的作用。在中国的刑事询问阶段,使用一种操作性较强的手段进行谎言识别或真实鉴定尤为重要。但是,国内鲜有研究者通过语言手段进行谎言识别研究。基于前人的研究成果,本研究以叙事分析法为研究手段,旨在探讨法律背景下中文刑事询问笔录的语言和结构特点,进而探讨识别真实或虚假的几个语言线索,以期对以后的司法实践和法律语言研究具有前瞻性价值。根据前人的研究成果,本研究提出了用于中文刑事询问笔录的识别谎言或证明真实的八个语言线索,其中四个线索假定为虚假陈述中最常出现的语言线索,另外四个假定为真实陈述中最频繁出现的语言线索。通过例证及对比案例分析,本研究详细阐述了这八个假定的语言线索。统计分析则进一步检验了这些语言线索在中文询问笔录中出现的频率。一方面,统计结果显示,在鉴定真实笔录的四个语言线索中,连贯性最为重要,但案情细节的数量及独特的感官细节在真实性笔录中也非常重要。另一方面,在识别虚假笔录的四个语言线索中,否认性话语是虚假笔录最为明显的特征,模糊性话语和开场白长度则居于次要地位。因此,六个最频繁出现的语言线索——连贯性,细节的数量,独特的感官特征,否定性话语,模糊性话语及开场白长度——可用于识别研究和相关的司法实践。在询问证人的阶段,警方可特别关注上述六个语言线索,这对于尽快破案具有一定作用。然而,在从事本研究过程中,笔者遇到了很多困难,由于中国司法实践过程中刑事询问笔录的严格保密性,语料的搜集是研究遇到的最大困难之一。尽管笔者已经尽最大努力去克服这些局限性,但由于有限的资源和语料搜集渠道,语料的种类和数量仍然不能使人满意,这对于研究结果的客观性将有一定的不良影响。因此,笔肯迫切期望本研究能抛砖引玉,期待以后的研究者能够突破这个局限性,在该领域做出更大贡献,以推动法律语言学在中国司法实践中的进一步应用。
[Abstract]:Lie recognition has always been a hot topic and focus in western legal and psychological circles. In the record of criminal interrogation, the authenticity or falsehood of the witness's statement plays an important role in successfully solving the case and whether the evidence can be accepted by the court. In China's criminal interrogation stage, it is very important to use an operational method to identify lies or identify the truth. However, there are few researchers in China who use language to identify lies. Based on the previous research results, this study aims to explore the linguistic and structural characteristics of Chinese criminal interrogation records under the legal background by means of narrative analysis, and then to identify several linguistic clues that are true or false. With a view to the future judicial practice and legal language research has a forward-looking value. Based on the results of previous studies, this study proposes eight linguistic cues to identify lies or prove truth in Chinese criminal interrogation notes, four of which are assumed to be the most common linguistic clues in false statements. The other four are assumed to be the most frequent linguistic cues in true statements. Through illustrations and comparative case studies, this study illustrates the eight hypothetical linguistic cues in detail. The statistical analysis further examined the frequency of these linguistic cues in Chinese interrogations. On the one hand, the statistical results show that coherence is the most important of the four linguistic cues in identifying the true record, but the quantity of the details of the case and the unique sensory details are also very important in the authenticity record. On the other hand, among the four linguistic cues to identify false records, denial is the most obvious feature, while the fuzzy discourse and the length of the opening line are of secondary importance. Therefore, the six most frequent linguistic cues-coherence, the number of details, unique sensory characteristics, negative discourse, fuzzy discourse and the length of the opening line-can be used to identify research and relevant judicial practices. In the stage of witness questioning, the police can pay special attention to the above six linguistic clues, which is helpful to solve the case as soon as possible. However, in the course of this study, the author has encountered a lot of difficulties. Due to the strict confidentiality of criminal interrogation records in the judicial practice in China, the collection of corpus is one of the biggest difficulties encountered in the study. Although the author has tried his best to overcome these limitations, due to the limited resources and data collection channels, the variety and quantity of the data are still not satisfactory, which will have a certain negative impact on the objectivity of the research results. Therefore, pen Ken urgently hopes that this study will lead to the future researchers can break through this limitation and make more contributions in this field, in order to promote the further application of forensic linguistics in Chinese judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：广东外语外贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D918.5
本文编号：2156394
[Abstract]:Lie recognition has always been a hot topic and focus in western legal and psychological circles. In the record of criminal interrogation, the authenticity or falsehood of the witness's statement plays an important role in successfully solving the case and whether the evidence can be accepted by the court. In China's criminal interrogation stage, it is very important to use an operational method to identify lies or identify the truth. However, there are few researchers in China who use language to identify lies. Based on the previous research results, this study aims to explore the linguistic and structural characteristics of Chinese criminal interrogation records under the legal background by means of narrative analysis, and then to identify several linguistic clues that are true or false. With a view to the future judicial practice and legal language research has a forward-looking value. Based on the results of previous studies, this study proposes eight linguistic cues to identify lies or prove truth in Chinese criminal interrogation notes, four of which are assumed to be the most common linguistic clues in false statements. The other four are assumed to be the most frequent linguistic cues in true statements. Through illustrations and comparative case studies, this study illustrates the eight hypothetical linguistic cues in detail. The statistical analysis further examined the frequency of these linguistic cues in Chinese interrogations. On the one hand, the statistical results show that coherence is the most important of the four linguistic cues in identifying the true record, but the quantity of the details of the case and the unique sensory details are also very important in the authenticity record. On the other hand, among the four linguistic cues to identify false records, denial is the most obvious feature, while the fuzzy discourse and the length of the opening line are of secondary importance. Therefore, the six most frequent linguistic cues-coherence, the number of details, unique sensory characteristics, negative discourse, fuzzy discourse and the length of the opening line-can be used to identify research and relevant judicial practices. In the stage of witness questioning, the police can pay special attention to the above six linguistic clues, which is helpful to solve the case as soon as possible. However, in the course of this study, the author has encountered a lot of difficulties. Due to the strict confidentiality of criminal interrogation records in the judicial practice in China, the collection of corpus is one of the biggest difficulties encountered in the study. Although the author has tried his best to overcome these limitations, due to the limited resources and data collection channels, the variety and quantity of the data are still not satisfactory, which will have a certain negative impact on the objectivity of the research results. Therefore, pen Ken urgently hopes that this study will lead to the future researchers can break through this limitation and make more contributions in this field, in order to promote the further application of forensic linguistics in Chinese judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：广东外语外贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D918.5
【相似文献】
相关会议论文 前2条
1 郑熠;;对犯罪嫌疑人谎言识别初探[A];第十一届全国心理学学术会议论文摘要集[C];2007年
2 张宁;张亭玉;张雨青;吴坎坎;;中国人对说谎行为和谎言识别的信念及其群体差异[A];第十二届全国心理学学术大会论文摘要集[C];2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 毛春香;论刑事讯问笔录中虚假陈述的识别[D];广东外语外贸大学;2008年
2 牟冬莲;情绪对谎言识别和信任影响的研究[D];西北师范大学;2009年
3 刘一丹;语言视角下的欺骗识别研究[D];西南大学;2010年
，本文编号：2156394
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/gongan/2156394.html
