反思帕卡的犯罪控制模式与正当程序模式

发布时间：2018-09-12 09:40

【摘要】：美国学者帕卡的犯罪控制模式与正当程序模式对我国的理论研究和立法实践都产生了深远的影响。但帕卡的学说还是有不足之处 :忽视了被害人的存在 ,也没有意识到对犯罪除了运用国家的刑罚权外 ,还有大量的私力救济以及官方的非正式惩罚与预防行为 ;在诉讼模式与具体制度的设计上 ,犯罪控制模式与正当程序模式学说过于强调了二者之间的对抗 ,而没有注意其相互统一和兼容之处。帕卡学说对我国的启示体现在 :学界过于强调了职权主义与当事人主义之间的差异 ,对它们在侦查制度上共同之处的研究失之准确 ;刑事诉讼法的再修改应该以职权主义模式为主 ,适当借鉴英美当事人主义中的合理因素 ;对犯罪嫌疑人、被告人与被害人的利益应该同等尊重 ,保障被害人参与诉讼过程并影响判决结果的权利
[Abstract]:The American scholar Parka's crime control model and due process model have exerted profound influence on the theoretical research and legislative practice of our country. However, there are still some deficiencies in Parka's theory: ignoring the existence of the victim and not realizing that there are a large number of private remedies and official informal punishment and preventive actions in addition to the use of the right of punishment of the state; In the design of litigation mode and specific system, the theory of crime control mode and due process model emphasizes the confrontation between them, and fails to pay attention to their mutual unity and compatibility. The enlightenment of Parka's theory to our country is as follows: the academic circles emphasize the difference between authority doctrine and litigant doctrine too much, and the research on their common points in the investigation system is inaccurate; The reamendment of the criminal procedure law should be mainly based on the mode of functionalism and draw on the reasonable factors of Anglo-American litigant doctrine. The interests of the suspects, the accused and the victims should be equally respected. The right of victims to participate in the proceedings and to influence the outcome of the judgement
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学
【分类号】：D917

【参考文献】