鉴定人错误鉴定责任追究
发布时间：2019-01-06 14:18
【摘要】： 本文分绪论、正文和结论三部分内容，约三万字。 绪论简要介绍了我国司法鉴定存在的问题，指出了研究如何追究鉴定人责任的重要性，并限定本文的研究范围是鉴定人错误鉴定责任追究。 正文分为五章： 第一章主要从追究鉴定人责任可以保障鉴定结论的质量和保障鉴定人的独立性的角度论述了追究鉴定人责任的必要性，并论述了追究鉴定人责任的合理性问题，使鉴定人责任追究成为必然。在此基础上，笔者论述了追究鉴定人责任所应当遵循的原则，并概括介绍了鉴定人责任追究的法律保障及责任的种类。 第二章主要讨论鉴定人错误鉴定责任的追究范围。笔者认为追究鉴定人的责任应限定在鉴定人有主观过错的范围内，如果鉴定人主观上既无故意也无过失，就应当不追究鉴定人责任。 第三章笔者具体论述了鉴定人错误鉴定应承担民事责任、刑事责任、行政责任以及秩序责任的原因和条件等问题。 第四章探讨错误鉴定责任的承担主体，，重点讨论鉴定人承担责任时与其他相关主体的责任分担问题，其中主要分析了鉴定机构和鉴定人的责任承担问题、司法机关内部的鉴定人错误鉴定的责任承担问题以及数个鉴定人之间的责任承担问题。 第五章探讨错误鉴定责任的追究程序，主要讨论对于鉴定人责任追究来讲应当特别注意或者现行法律没有针对性规定或规定不完善的程序问题，包括错误鉴定的确认、举证责任问题以及鉴定人责任追究程序中的权利保障问题。 结论对全文进行了总结，强调只有从实体和程序两个方面对鉴定人错误鉴定责任追究进行讨论才能使责任追究真正得到落实。
[Abstract]:This article is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, about 30,000 words. The introduction briefly introduces the problems existing in judicial expertise in our country, points out the importance of studying how to investigate the responsibility of experts, and limits the scope of this paper to investigate the responsibility of experts' error identification. The text is divided into five chapters: the first chapter mainly discusses the necessity of investigating expert responsibility from the point of view of ensuring the quality of expert conclusion and the independence of expert. It also discusses the rationality of investigating the connoisseur's responsibility, which makes it inevitable to investigate the connoisseur's responsibility. On this basis, the author discusses the principles that should be followed in the investigation of connoisseur's responsibility, and generalizes the legal guarantee and the types of liability of the ascertainer's liability investigation. The second chapter mainly discusses the scope of the identification of the fault identification responsibility. The author thinks that the responsibility of investigating expert should be limited to the scope of subjective fault. If the expert has neither intention nor fault subjectively, he should not be held responsible. In the third chapter, the author discusses the reasons and conditions of the appraiser's wrong identification, such as civil liability, criminal liability, administrative responsibility and order responsibility. The fourth chapter discusses the main body of the responsibility of false identification, focuses on the problem of the burden sharing between the appraiser and other relevant subjects, and mainly analyzes the problem of the responsibility of the appraisal institution and the expert. The problem of bearing the responsibility of the experts in the judicial organs and the responsibility between several experts. The fifth chapter discusses the procedure of investigating the responsibility for false identification. It mainly discusses the procedure that should be paid special attention to or that the current law has no specific provisions or imperfect provisions, including the confirmation of false identification. The burden of proof and the protection of rights in the procedure of ascertaining the responsibility of experts. The conclusion summarizes the full text, and emphasizes that only by discussing the responsibility investigation of expert's error identification from two aspects of entity and procedure, can we really carry out the responsibility investigation.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2002
【分类号】：D918.9
[Abstract]:This article is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, about 30,000 words. The introduction briefly introduces the problems existing in judicial expertise in our country, points out the importance of studying how to investigate the responsibility of experts, and limits the scope of this paper to investigate the responsibility of experts' error identification. The text is divided into five chapters: the first chapter mainly discusses the necessity of investigating expert responsibility from the point of view of ensuring the quality of expert conclusion and the independence of expert. It also discusses the rationality of investigating the connoisseur's responsibility, which makes it inevitable to investigate the connoisseur's responsibility. On this basis, the author discusses the principles that should be followed in the investigation of connoisseur's responsibility, and generalizes the legal guarantee and the types of liability of the ascertainer's liability investigation. The second chapter mainly discusses the scope of the identification of the fault identification responsibility. The author thinks that the responsibility of investigating expert should be limited to the scope of subjective fault. If the expert has neither intention nor fault subjectively, he should not be held responsible. In the third chapter, the author discusses the reasons and conditions of the appraiser's wrong identification, such as civil liability, criminal liability, administrative responsibility and order responsibility. The fourth chapter discusses the main body of the responsibility of false identification, focuses on the problem of the burden sharing between the appraiser and other relevant subjects, and mainly analyzes the problem of the responsibility of the appraisal institution and the expert. The problem of bearing the responsibility of the experts in the judicial organs and the responsibility between several experts. The fifth chapter discusses the procedure of investigating the responsibility for false identification. It mainly discusses the procedure that should be paid special attention to or that the current law has no specific provisions or imperfect provisions, including the confirmation of false identification. The burden of proof and the protection of rights in the procedure of ascertaining the responsibility of experts. The conclusion summarizes the full text, and emphasizes that only by discussing the responsibility investigation of expert's error identification from two aspects of entity and procedure, can we really carry out the responsibility investigation.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2002
【分类号】：D918.9
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 谌宏伟;;法院委任之鉴定人错误鉴定的民事责任[J];四川警察学院学报;2011年04期
2 侯书和;;略论公共危机管理问责制[J];经济与社会发展;2011年05期
3 ;党政领导干部选拔任用工作责任追究办法(试行)[J];人事天地;2010年20期
4 ;省情速递[J];领导决策信息;2011年20期
5 ;一部深入推进反腐倡廉建设的基础性法规——解读《关于实行党风廉政建设责任制的规定》[J];共产党人;2011年02期
6 陈书纪;;贯彻落实四项监督制度与提高领导干部选拔任用公信度[J];中共云南省委党校学报;2011年03期
7 秦佩华;胡s
本文编号：2402904
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/gongan/2402904.html
