C市公安派出所刑事案件办理实证研究
发布时间：2019-01-08 16:38
【摘要】：从目前的法律法规来看,刑事案件办理并非派出所的主业,更非派出所的专业。但是执法实践中,很多地区的派出所往往承担着刑事案件破案、打击处理的大部分任务(C市近几年就是如此)。派出所作为公安机关的派出机构,集治安防范、社会管理、打击犯罪、服务群众多项职能于一体,这使得派出所在办理刑事案件中的角色愈加复杂多变。公安派出所办理的刑事案件主要有哪些?它们都是怎么办理刑事案的?采用何种刑侦模式更能发挥派出所“人熟”、“地熟”的优势,更能有力的打击犯罪?何种绩效考核方式更能激励派出所进行刑事侦查?这些现实问题不仅涉及相关制度、模式的选择,还影响着刑事诉讼程序的完善及未来公安派出所工作的发展方向。 本文以C市T、Q、N三个公安派出所刑事案件办理工作的实况为研究对象,通过大量第一手资料,包括三个派出所的内部资料、调查记录和与民警、民众、政府工作人员等的访谈记录等,对C市派出所办理刑事案件的相关问题进行了论证。文章首先介绍了C市公安派出所的概况,包括派出所的分布、数量、体制模式和外部关系等。其次,文章对T、Q、N三个派出所办理刑事案件进行了实证考察,认为C市派出所办理的主要刑事案件是盗窃、故意伤害、贩卖毒品三类,现行案件多、案件影响较小、刑罚较轻是其特点。再次,文章分析了C市派出所在刑事案件办理中的问题,主要有：C市的刑侦模式、派出所体制在某种程度上阻碍了对刑事案件的有效侦查；刑侦绩效考核不够合理,纯“数字型”的压力体制下出现了违背侦查规律的怪现象,如“按照考核指标办案而非发案规律”、“人为拆分案件”、“不按时起诉”等,甚至还存在着做假案的情况；当前的刑事诉讼程序中存在和派出所办理刑事案件特点不相协调的地方；以及程序衔接、人员素质等问题。文章最后,笔者认为,“片区刑警大队”的刑侦体制更有利于打击犯罪和治安防控,一方面由“片区刑警大队”承担主要的破案、打击任务；另一方面由派出所做好治安防控工作。但是二者必须构建合理的配合体制、机制,对派出所不能下达过多的破案、打击任务,考核应以为破案、打击提供有效线索为主。笔者还认为有必要探索适合基层办案特点的程序,如速决机制。此外,对如何转变办案观念、提升案侦人员素质、完善相关诉讼程序等问题,笔者也提出了自己的建议。
[Abstract]:From the current laws and regulations, the handling of criminal cases is not the main profession of police stations, much less the profession of police stations. However, in law enforcement practice, police stations in many areas are often responsible for solving criminal cases and dealing with most of the tasks (such as in C City in recent years). The police station, as a public security agency, integrates the functions of public security prevention, social management, combating crime and serving the masses, which makes the role of the police station in handling criminal cases more complex and changeable. What are the main criminal cases handled by the police station? How do they handle criminal cases? What kind of criminal investigation mode can give play to the advantages of "people familiar" and "local familiarity" in police stations, and can be more effective in cracking down on crime? What kind of performance appraisal method can encourage the police station to carry on the criminal investigation? These practical problems not only involve the choice of relevant system and mode, but also affect the perfection of criminal procedure and the development direction of police station in the future. This article takes the fact that the criminal cases of the three police stations in Teng Qian police station in C city as the research object, through a large number of firsthand information, including the internal information of the three police stations, the investigation record and the police, the public, The interview records of government staff, etc., demonstrate the related problems of criminal cases handled by police station in C city. The article first introduces the general situation of police station in C city, including the distribution, quantity, system model and external relationship of police station. Secondly, the article makes an empirical investigation on the criminal cases handled by the three police stations in Teng Qian N. It is concluded that the main criminal cases handled by the police stations in C city are theft, intentional injury, drug trafficking, and there are more current cases and less impact on the cases. The lighter punishment is its characteristic. Thirdly, the article analyzes the problems in the handling of criminal cases in the police station of C city. The main problems are: the criminal investigation model of C city, the police station system to some extent hindered the effective investigation of criminal cases; The performance appraisal of criminal investigation is not reasonable enough. Under the pressure system of pure "digital type", the strange phenomenon of violating the law of investigation appears, such as "handling cases according to the examination index rather than the law of issuing cases", "splitting cases artificially", "not suing on time", and so on. There are even cases of fraud; There are some problems in the current criminal procedure, such as the disharmony between the police station and the police station, the connection of procedure, the quality of personnel and so on. Finally, the author thinks that the criminal investigation system of "Criminal Police Brigade" is more conducive to cracking down on crime and public security prevention and control, on the one hand, "District Criminal Police Brigade" is responsible for the main task of solving cases and cracking down; On the other hand by the police station to do a good job of public security prevention and control work. But they must build reasonable cooperation system and mechanism, can not send too many cases to the police station, attack the task, check should be to solve the case, attack to provide effective clues. The author also thinks that it is necessary to explore the procedures suitable for the basic level case handling, such as quick decision mechanism. In addition, the author also puts forward his own suggestions on how to change the concept of handling cases, improve the quality of investigators, and improve the relevant litigation procedures.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D631.13
本文编号：2404857
[Abstract]:From the current laws and regulations, the handling of criminal cases is not the main profession of police stations, much less the profession of police stations. However, in law enforcement practice, police stations in many areas are often responsible for solving criminal cases and dealing with most of the tasks (such as in C City in recent years). The police station, as a public security agency, integrates the functions of public security prevention, social management, combating crime and serving the masses, which makes the role of the police station in handling criminal cases more complex and changeable. What are the main criminal cases handled by the police station? How do they handle criminal cases? What kind of criminal investigation mode can give play to the advantages of "people familiar" and "local familiarity" in police stations, and can be more effective in cracking down on crime? What kind of performance appraisal method can encourage the police station to carry on the criminal investigation? These practical problems not only involve the choice of relevant system and mode, but also affect the perfection of criminal procedure and the development direction of police station in the future. This article takes the fact that the criminal cases of the three police stations in Teng Qian police station in C city as the research object, through a large number of firsthand information, including the internal information of the three police stations, the investigation record and the police, the public, The interview records of government staff, etc., demonstrate the related problems of criminal cases handled by police station in C city. The article first introduces the general situation of police station in C city, including the distribution, quantity, system model and external relationship of police station. Secondly, the article makes an empirical investigation on the criminal cases handled by the three police stations in Teng Qian N. It is concluded that the main criminal cases handled by the police stations in C city are theft, intentional injury, drug trafficking, and there are more current cases and less impact on the cases. The lighter punishment is its characteristic. Thirdly, the article analyzes the problems in the handling of criminal cases in the police station of C city. The main problems are: the criminal investigation model of C city, the police station system to some extent hindered the effective investigation of criminal cases; The performance appraisal of criminal investigation is not reasonable enough. Under the pressure system of pure "digital type", the strange phenomenon of violating the law of investigation appears, such as "handling cases according to the examination index rather than the law of issuing cases", "splitting cases artificially", "not suing on time", and so on. There are even cases of fraud; There are some problems in the current criminal procedure, such as the disharmony between the police station and the police station, the connection of procedure, the quality of personnel and so on. Finally, the author thinks that the criminal investigation system of "Criminal Police Brigade" is more conducive to cracking down on crime and public security prevention and control, on the one hand, "District Criminal Police Brigade" is responsible for the main task of solving cases and cracking down; On the other hand by the police station to do a good job of public security prevention and control work. But they must build reasonable cooperation system and mechanism, can not send too many cases to the police station, attack the task, check should be to solve the case, attack to provide effective clues. The author also thinks that it is necessary to explore the procedures suitable for the basic level case handling, such as quick decision mechanism. In addition, the author also puts forward his own suggestions on how to change the concept of handling cases, improve the quality of investigators, and improve the relevant litigation procedures.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D631.13
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 师索;;误区与规避:我国警务改革的理性反思——兼对西方公共行政理论的本土警务适用性批判[J];福建警察学院学报;2011年01期
2 李栋;曹学林;;基层公安派出所勤务制度改革的实践与思考[J];公安研究;2006年05期
3 李哲宇;;我国公安派出所的发展与改革[J];公安研究;2007年11期
4 沈培菊;;论公安派出所体制模式和运行机制的改革创新[J];贵州警官职业学院学报;2008年04期
5 刘文鹏;;论基层派出所的选择性执法——以加强执法管理为视角[J];公安研究;2011年06期
6 云山城;曹晓宝;;侦审合一后的预审工作研究[J];湖北警官学院学报;2009年05期
7 李翔;;新型盗窃罪的司法适用路径[J];华东政法大学学报;2011年05期
8 刘霞;;派出所基层警务机制的优化——以“三队一室”改革为视角[J];新疆警官高等专科学校学报;2006年02期
9 赵伟;;日本交番制度概述及对我国公安派出所的启示[J];吉林公安高等专科学校学报;2010年05期
10 任守祥;;对当前基层警务运行的反思与重构[J];江西公安专科学校学报;2006年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 龙显雄;我国二十世纪末刑侦体制改革得失考[D];湘潭大学;2005年
2 张伸;论公安派出所的职能[D];中国政法大学;2007年
3 陈浩星;基于平衡计分卡的公安机关绩效评估指标体系构建及实证研究[D];湘潭大学;2008年
4 梁华;公安派出所体制改革法律问题研究[D];苏州大学;2008年
，本文编号：2404857
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/gongan/2404857.html
