当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 国际关系论文 >

秦代地方日常行政的权责关系——以县令丞行政权责为中心的考察

发布时间:2018-03-03 13:32

  本文选题:秦代 切入点:地方 出处:《求索》2017年04期  论文类型:期刊论文


【摘要】:地方行政权责关系作为横向权力的分配及运作问题,是政治研究的核心问题之一。秦代地方政务文书出土为展开考察实践运作的权责关系提供空间。从日常行政与法律的视角审视,秦代县令丞的行政职权大致分为法律授权、自主以及两者兼有三种;行政责任分为自负责任与连坐责任,均有法律依据。秦代通过法律规范地方行政权责,调整权责关系,追求权责一致,不过实践运作出现五种权责背离情况:权责的法律制度安排非对称、法律规定责任的僵化、消极责任的问责幅度过大、同体问责严重干扰行政执行、权责关系的皇帝导向引发的背离。究其根本,秦代地方行政权责关系问题实为传统地方行政与国家法治的矛盾问题一种表现。
[Abstract]:The distribution and operation of local administrative power and responsibility as horizontal power, Local government documents unearthed in Qin Dynasty provide space for investigating the relationship between power and responsibility in practice. From the perspective of daily administration and law, the administrative authority of Ling Cheng in Qin Dynasty is roughly divided into legal authorization. There are three kinds of autonomy and both; the administrative responsibility is divided into conceited responsibility and even sitting responsibility, all of them have legal basis. The Qin Dynasty regulates the local administrative power and responsibility by law, adjusts the relationship between power and responsibility, and pursues the unity of power and responsibility. However, there are five deviations in practice: asymmetric arrangement of the legal system of power and responsibility, ossification of legal provisions, excessive accountability of negative responsibilities, and serious interference with administrative execution by cohort accountability. Based on the deviation caused by the emperor's guidance of the relationship between power and responsibility, the problem of the relationship between the power and responsibility of the local administration in Qin Dynasty is a manifestation of the contradiction between the traditional local administration and the rule of law in the country.
【作者单位】: 广东嘉应学院政法学院;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金青年项目(16CZS029)
【分类号】:D691.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 吴方基;;里耶秦简“主”称谓再考察[J];档案学通讯;2016年06期

2 吴方基;;秦代中央与地方关系的重新审视——以出土政务文书为中心[J];史林;2016年01期

3 吴方基;;论秦代金布的隶属及其性质[J];古代文明;2015年02期

4 沈刚;;《里耶秦简》(壹)所见作徒管理问题探讨[J];史学月刊;2015年02期

5 史达;;岳麓秦简《为狱等状四种》新见的一枚漏简与案例六的编联[J];湖南大学学报(社会科学版);2014年04期

6 刘太祥;;简牍所见秦汉律令行政[J];南都学坛;2013年04期

7 于振波;;秦代吏治管窥——以秦简司法、行政文书为中心[J];湖南大学学报(社会科学版);2013年03期

8 麻宝斌;郭蕊;;权责一致与权责背离:在理论与现实之间[J];政治学研究;2010年01期

9 陈松长;;岳麓书院所藏秦简综述[J];文物;2009年03期

10 周洁;;中国语境下的行政问责制[J];行政论坛;2006年06期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 郭蕊;权责关系的行政学分析[D];吉林大学;2009年



本文编号:1561237

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/1561237.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c4040***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com