类型化方法与国际关系研究设计

发布时间：2018-03-16 21:20

本文选题：类型化　切入点：修正主义/维持现状　出处：《世界经济与政治》2017年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：类型化是构建社会科学理论的一种基本方法,它帮助研究者对社会事物、现象和行为进行归类,对核心概念进行操作化,并通过抽象概念与经验事实的匹配进行理论框架的构思。在确定研究对象、识别解释要素以及形成因果关系等研究环节,类型化方法都发挥着重要作用。然而,在国际关系理论研究成果中,许多流行的类型化存在过度简化、分类逻辑标准不明确、难以涵盖重要的经验类型等突出问题。由于分析概念的理想类型与经验事实的实际类型之间出现脱节,理论体系的内部逻辑一致性和严密性遭到削弱,理论的解释力和有效性也存在缺陷。通过批判性评估修正主义与维持现状国家的区分、国家战略行为的二分法以及温特的三种无政府文化逻辑,作者揭示了这些类型化存在的典型问题,并且展示了如何利用重构、细分和综合等更为严格的类型化技术对它们进行修正、扩展和完善。更加自觉地运用类型化方法、构建更为精致的类型化框架为我们观察国际政治提供了较好的分析视角,也为国际关系理论的创新提供了可能性。
[Abstract]:Typology is a basic method of constructing social science theory. It helps researchers classify social things, phenomena and behaviors, and manipulate core concepts. By matching abstract concepts with empirical facts, the theoretical framework is conceived. The typology plays an important role in determining research objects, identifying explanatory elements and forming causality. In the research results of international relations theory, many popular typologization is oversimplified, and the classification logic standard is not clear. It is difficult to cover prominent problems such as important types of experience. As a result of the disconnection between the ideal types of analytical concepts and the actual types of empirical facts, the internal logical consistency and rigour of the theoretical system are weakened, The explanatory power and validity of the theory are also flawed. Through critical assessment of the distinction between revisionism and the maintenance of the status quo, the dichotomy of national strategic behavior and the three anarchic cultural logic of Winter, The author reveals the typical problems of these typologization, and shows how to modify, expand and perfect them by using more strict typing techniques such as reconfiguration, subdivision and synthesis. The construction of a more refined typological framework not only provides us with a good analytical perspective to observe international politics, but also provides a possibility for the innovation of the theory of international relations.
【作者单位】：南开大学周恩来政府管理学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目的阶段性成果(项目编号:15CGJ031)
【分类号】：D815

【相似文献】