当代中国马克思主义理论研究范式及其转型

发布时间：2018-04-09 08:44

本文选题：马克思主义理论　切入点：规范分析　出处：《科学社会主义》2017年05期

【摘要】：马克思主义理论一级学科成立以后,大体呈现出三种研究范式:应然层面的规范分析、或然层面的文本解读、实然层面的经验叙事。三种研究范式受制于马克思主义理论的意识形态、理论体系、社会实践三重定位,在研究中呈现出相互独立和决然分割的状态,这影响到学术研究和学科建设的纵深发展。马克思主义理论应当进一步整合现有的研究范式,相互借鉴、优势互补,促进应然、或然以及实然的贯通,结合规范分析、文本解读以及经验叙事,突出马克思主义实证研究,强化马克思主义理论脉络,形成马克思主义方法体系,从而推动马克思主义理论研究范式的转型与发展,使马克思主义理论不断介入到中国乃至全球的学科分工体系当中,从学科自觉走向学科自信。
[Abstract]:After the establishment of the primary discipline of Marxist theory, there are three research paradigms: normative analysis of the supposed level, textual interpretation of the natural level and empirical narration at the realistic level.The three research paradigms are subject to the triple orientation of ideology, theoretical system and social practice of Marxist theory, and present a state of independence and absolute division in the study, which affects the in-depth development of academic research and discipline construction.Marxist theory should further integrate the existing research paradigm, draw lessons from each other, complement each other, promote the penetration of ought, likelihood and reality, combine normative analysis, text interpretation and empirical narration, highlight Marxist empirical research.Strengthening the context of Marxist theory, forming a Marxist method system, thus promoting the transformation and development of Marxist theoretical research paradigm, making Marxist theory continuously involved in the system of discipline division of labor in China and even the whole world.From discipline consciousness to discipline confidence.
【作者单位】：河海大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金后期资助项目“思想政治教育学科发展研究”(项目编号:16FKS009) 中央高校基本科研业务费项目“社区思想政治工作的实践逻辑及转型——以江苏省为例”(项目编号:2017B07614)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D61

【相似文献】