自由、正义与秩序——全球公域治理的伦理之思

发布时间：2018-04-16 07:47

本文选题：全球公域治理 + 自由　；参考：《世界经济与政治》2017年01期

【摘要】：全球公域系指公海与国际海底、国际空域、外太空及网络空间等处于主权国家管辖之外而为全人类所共享的区域与领域。它不仅是一个描述性和功能性概念,同时也是一个规范性概念。全球公域伦理最早可追溯到古希腊和古罗马时期,通过三个阶段的论战,形成了当下以自由、正义与秩序三大价值为核心的伦理体系。这一体系存在一个"三元悖论",即在国际无政府状态下,自由、正义与秩序三重伦理诉求难以同时实现,或至多只能同时满足其中的两者。一般而言,以美国为首的西方发达国家推崇自由与秩序,而广大发展中国家则关注正义与秩序。在全球公域治理实践中,伦理"三元悖论"又可归结为西方世界延续自由国际主义治理秩序之努力与非西方世界重建公域正义与秩序之决心间的对垒。为消解全球公域治理的伦理"三元悖论",世界各国应摆脱西方自由国际主义秩序主导下"全球治理、地方价值"之怪状,逐步完善全球公域治理的伦理体系,引导全球公域最终走向善治。
[Abstract]:Global Commons refer to the high seas and international seabed, international airspace, outer space and cyberspace, which are shared by all mankind under the jurisdiction of sovereign states.It is not only a descriptive and functional concept, but also a normative concept.The ethics of the global Commons can be traced back to ancient Greece and ancient Rome. Through three stages of controversy, the ethics system with the three values of freedom, justice and order as the core is formed.There is a "ternary paradox" in this system, that is, under the condition of international anarchy, it is difficult to realize the triple ethical demands of freedom, justice and order at the same time, or at most can only satisfy both of them at the same time.Generally speaking, the western developed countries, led by the United States, promote freedom and order, while the developing countries are concerned about justice and order.In the practice of global Commons governance, the ethical "ternary paradox" can be summed up as a confrontation between the Western world's efforts to continue the liberal internationalist governance order and the non-Western world's determination to re-establish justice and order in the Commons.In order to resolve the ethical "ternary paradox" of global Commons governance, countries in the world should get rid of the strange character of "global governance, local value" under the domination of western liberal internationalism order, and gradually perfect the ethical system of global common domain governance.To guide the global Commons towards good governance.
【作者单位】：上海师范大学哲学与法政学院;
【基金】：上海师范大学人文社会科学研究一般项目“美国、欧盟、中国全球公域治理观比较研究” 上海高校青年教师培养资助项目“全球公域治理中的欧盟因素”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D80

【相似文献】