国外智库恐怖主义概念界定及其数据库建设的评析

发布时间：2018-04-28 15:57

本文选题：国外智库 + 恐怖主义　；参考：《探索》2017年02期

【摘要】：国外智库对恐怖主义事件的初期研究多集中于使用小规模样本分析或者少量案例比较的研究方法。随着恐怖主义事件的数量增加,同时数据的采集处理和样本控制技术不断提升,量化恐怖主义的研究方法日渐成熟。在此过程中,恐怖主义数据库确定本数据库使用的恐怖主义操作定义主要有基于结果的伦理向度和基于过程的法律向度两条路径。恐怖主义指数作为数据的使用者是在所选数据库的恐怖主义认知的基础上,通过赋值分配去解读恐怖主义、探析恐怖主义危害等议题。恐怖主义的量化分析需要研究者在客观性意义上兼顾指标的透明度、可信度、有效度等特点。质性意义上,现有数据库和指数对恐怖主义的概念化过程贯彻着量化分析者和目标受众的政治指向和价值偏好,因而在建设中国特色的反恐数据库和指数时需保持警惕并予以批判和修正。
[Abstract]:The initial study of terrorism by foreign think-tanks focuses on the use of small-scale sample analysis or a small number of case studies. With the increase of the number of terrorist incidents, the acquisition and processing of data and the improvement of sample control technology, the research methods of quantitative terrorism are becoming more and more mature. In this process, the terrorism database determines that the definition of terrorism operation used in this database includes two paths: result-based ethical dimension and process-based legal dimension. As the user of the data, the terrorism index is based on the cognition of terrorism in the selected database. The quantitative analysis of terrorism requires researchers to take into account the characteristics of transparency, credibility and effectiveness in the sense of objectivity. Qualitatively, the conceptualization of terrorism in existing databases and indices carries out the political direction and value preferences of both the quantitative analysts and the target audience. Therefore, in the construction of anti-terrorism database and index with Chinese characteristics, we should be vigilant and criticize and revise it.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学政治学研究院;
【基金】：上海市哲学社会科学规划课题“极端主义对国际政治安全认知的重塑”(2015BGJ001);项目负责人:章远华东政法大学政治学研究院“华与罗世界文明与比较政治研究项目”(HDZ005);项目负责人:高奇琦
【分类号】：D815.5

【相似文献】