政府主导下的居民离散性参与:类型、策略与特征——基于对N市JY区公共文化服务实践的考察

发布时间：2018-05-11 14:25

本文选题：政府 + 城市社区　；参考：《社会科学》2017年04期

【摘要】：依据是否需要他人动员和与基层政府联系紧密程度两个维度,可以将居民参与划分为自娱自乐型、发挥余热型、依附型和即兴参与等四种类型。其中,自娱自乐型和发挥余热型属于主动性参与,依附型参与和即兴参与则带有被动消极性质。基层政府的态度对发挥余热型居民的参与热情具有双重影响,其“表演式”服务会消解自娱自乐型居民的参与意愿,“强制参与”也会放大依附型居民在社区参与过程中的消极情绪。居民参与行为在基层政府的强势主导下存在着明显的离散性特征。如欲克服参与中的离散性,使居民真正成为具有主体性地位的核心主体,既需要培养居民的独立人格和公共精神,也需要政府让渡一些空间、资源和权力,使居民团体真正成为代表居民利益、参与文化建设的强大载体。
[Abstract]:According to the two dimensions of need for mobilization of others and close relationship with grass-roots government, residents' participation can be divided into four types: self-entertainment, exertion, dependence and improvisation. Among them, the type of self-entertainment and the type of exertion heat belongs to the active participation, the dependent type of participation and the improvisational participation are passive and passive. The attitude of grass-roots governments has a double influence on exerting the enthusiasm of the residents of the afterheat type of participation, and their "performance style" service will dispel the willingness of the residents to participate in self-entertainment. Compulsory participation also amplifies the negative emotions of dependent residents in the process of community participation. The behavior of resident participation has obvious discrete characteristics under the dominance of grass-roots government. If we want to overcome the dispersion of participation and make residents become the core subject with subjective status, we should not only cultivate the independent personality and public spirit of residents, but also need the government to release some space, resources and power. To make residents' groups truly represent the interests of residents and participate in cultural construction as a powerful carrier.
【作者单位】：河海大学马克思主义学院;南京市社会科学院;河海大学;
【分类号】：D621.5;C912.8

【相似文献】