我国养老服务多元供给主体关系研究

发布时间：2018-05-14 00:18

本文选题：养老服务 + 供给主体　；参考：《南昌大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：在人口老龄化、高龄化问题日趋严重的背景下,养老服务供给主体关系不明朗,多元供给服务体系发展缓慢。应对人口老龄化、高龄化,完善养老服务供给体系成为党和国家乃至社会各界共同关注的焦点。为积极应对人口老龄化、高龄化问题,完善养老服务供给体系,在国家政策上我国开始转变传统以家庭或政府单一供给向以家庭、政府、非政府组织、市场等多元合作供给的转变。但是,现实中由于忽略对供给主体关系模式的实证研究,使得养老服务主体供给结构不完善,导致养老服务供给效果低下。本文以我国人口老龄化、高龄化为出发点,从政策分析角度梳理我国供给主体的演变过程,以福利多元主义理论为理论基础,构建四维供给主体分析框架,从理论上厘清各供给主体所应当履行的职责与任务。并选取2011年中国老年健康影响因素跟踪调查(CLHLS)数据作为分析对象,采用实证分析方法对我国养老服务供给主体之间关系模式现状进行评估。研究得出,我国养老服务供给中家庭供给占主导、社会供给功能弱化、政府供给角色“缺失”严重。因此,可以说,这与福利多元主义理论倡导的多元主体合作供给模式相差甚远。在此基础上,本文指出我国养老服务多元主体合作供给关系未形成,主要受养老服务供给不足、家庭供给“独木难支”、政府退出供给等问题影响,提出从转变政府职能、发挥家庭供给作用、提倡社会供给等方面进行完善的具体建议。
[Abstract]:Under the background of the aging population and the aging problem, the relationship between the main body of the old-age service supply is not clear, and the development of the multiple supply service system is slow. To cope with the aging of the population and to improve the supply system of old-age services has become the focus of attention of the Party, the country and even all sectors of society. In order to positively deal with the problem of aging and aging of the population, and to improve the supply system of old-age care services, China has begun to change its national policy from the traditional single supply of families or governments to families, governments and non-governmental organizations. Market and other diversified cooperative supply changes. However, due to the neglect of the empirical research on the relationship between the main supply and the supply, the supply structure of the main body of pension service is not perfect, which leads to the low effect of the supply of the service for the aged. Based on the aging and aging of the population in China, this paper combs the evolution of the main body of supply from the angle of policy analysis, and constructs the framework of the analysis of the main body of supply in four dimensions on the basis of the theory of welfare pluralism. In theory, the responsibilities and tasks of each supplier should be clarified. The data of CLHLS in 2011 are selected to evaluate the current situation of the relationship between the main providers of old-age services in China. The research shows that the family supply is dominant, the social supply function is weakened, and the government supply role is seriously absent. Therefore, it can be said that this is far from the multi-subject cooperative supply model advocated by the theory of welfare pluralism. On the basis of this, this paper points out that the cooperative supply relationship of multiple subjects of pension service in our country has not formed, which is mainly affected by the insufficient supply of old-age service, the lack of family supply, the withdrawal of the government from supply, and so on, and puts forward that the transformation of government functions should be taken into account. Give play to the role of family supply, promote social supply and other aspects of specific suggestions to improve.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D669.6

【参考文献】