我国养老服务业发展中的财税政策研究
本文选题:养老服务业 + 财税政策 ; 参考:《辽宁大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:在我国人口老龄化趋势不断加大、老年人人口激增及人口结构不断老化的背景下,老年人对于养老服务需求与日俱增。受我国历史传统思想影响,一直以来我国的养老主要以家庭为主,在我国实行计划生育政策以来,家庭人口数量不断减少,难以承担日益增加的养老负担。同时,政府的财力负担不断加剧,也难以提供满足社会实际需求的养老功能。养老服务业所呈现的供给与需求之间的矛盾不断加大,供给与需求的数量存在缺口。老年人对于养老服务的需求呈现多样化、高标准化,而现存的养老服务在很大程度上无法满足多元化的养老需求。养老服务业具有明显的公共服务性质,关乎广大群众的切身利益,是国家完善社会保障机制的重要领域。它的非营利性和公益性决定了其不能单独由政府或由市场提供。因此,养老服务业应该引入多元的参与主体,同时,明确各参与主体在养老服务业中的职能和角色。政府作为政策的制定者和监督者,应该发挥其支持和引导的职能,完善相关政策,鼓励多元主体参与进来,为养老服务业的发展创造良好的外部环境。但是,就目前政府对养老服务业所采取的扶持政策的现状来看,存在着财政投入不足、补贴结构不合理、补贴监管机制不足、政府购买缺乏规范流程以及税收优惠激励不足等问题,难以起到支持和鼓励多元主体参与养老服务业中来的作用。因此,为了解决现存的问题,亟需对现有的养老服务业的相关财税政策进行完善。本文以相关理论阐述和作用方式分析作为研究的理论支撑,为接下来的分析提供理论支持。同时以相关数据为支撑、结合具体案例分析,阐述养老服务业的发展现状,以及相关财税政策的发展现状,进而对我国养老服务业在发展过程中取得的成绩与面临的诸多问题进行总结。首先,本文主要集中在目前对养老服务业实行的财税政策存在的一些问题的提出。其次,从美国、日本、新加坡这几个国外国家实行的养老服务业发展的做法和财税政策中,总结了我国可借鉴的经验。最后,对我国养老服务业的更好发展提出合理化财税政策建议。
[Abstract]:Under the background of the increasing trend of population aging, the population explosion and the aging of the population structure, the demand for old-age services is increasing day by day. Under the influence of our country's historical tradition thought, the old-age support in our country has been dominated by the family. Since the implementation of the family planning policy, the number of the family population has been decreasing and it is difficult to bear the increasing burden of providing for the aged. At the same time, the financial burden of the government is increasing, and it is difficult to provide the pension function to meet the actual needs of the society. The contradiction between supply and demand is increasing, and there is a gap between supply and demand. The needs of the elderly for pension services are diversified and highly standardized, while the existing pension services can not meet the needs of the diversified pension to a large extent. The endowment service industry has the obvious public service nature, relates to the masses vital interest, is the important domain which the country consummates the social security mechanism. Its non-profit and commonweal nature determines that it cannot be provided by the government alone or by the market. Therefore, the pension service industry should introduce multiple participants, and at the same time, clarify the functions and roles of each participant in the pension service industry. As the policy makers and supervisors, the government should give play to its function of support and guidance, improve the relevant policies, encourage the participation of multiple subjects, and create a good external environment for the development of the old-age service industry. However, in view of the current situation of the government's support policies for the old-age service industry, there are insufficient financial investment, unreasonable subsidy structure, inadequate subsidy supervision mechanism, It is difficult to support and encourage the multiple subjects to participate in the old-age service industry because of the lack of standard process of government purchase and insufficient incentive of tax incentives. Therefore, in order to solve the existing problems, there is an urgent need to improve the existing pension services related fiscal and tax policies. This paper provides theoretical support for the following analysis by using the related theories and the analysis of the mode of action as the theoretical support of the research. At the same time, with the relevant data as the support, combined with the specific case analysis, this paper expounds the current situation of the development of the old-age service industry, as well as the development of related fiscal and tax policies. And then summarizes the achievements and problems in the development of the pension service industry in China. First of all, this paper mainly focuses on the problems existing in the current fiscal and taxation policies for the old-age service industry. Secondly, this paper summarizes the experience of our country from the practices and fiscal policies of the development of pension service industry implemented by the United States, Japan and Singapore. Finally, the better development of the pension service industry in China proposed rationalization of fiscal and tax policy recommendations.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D669.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨洋;;促进我国养老服务发展的财税政策研究[J];现代经济信息;2016年17期
2 杨慧;;健全我国养老服务体系的财税政策研究[J];现代经济信息;2016年08期
3 北京市地方税务局,北京税收法制建设研究会课题组;;我国养老服务业税收政策创新研究[J];老龄科学研究;2016年03期
4 王辉;;政策工具视角下我国养老服务业政策研究[J];中国特色社会主义研究;2015年02期
5 李广明;胡立;朱远方;;我国养老服务业的财税体制改革探讨[J];中国劳动;2015年04期
6 唐振兴;;对发展中国养老服务业的思考[J];老龄科学研究;2014年04期
7 安俊美;;民间资本参与社会养老服务提供的制度政策分析[J];财经理论研究;2014年01期
8 王国飞;;加快养老产业发展 培育首都经济新增长点[J];宏观经济管理;2013年12期
9 郑洁;;促进中国养老服务业发展的财税政策研究[J];石家庄经济学院学报;2013年05期
10 罗海平;凌丹;;加快推进我国养老服务产业发展的对策和建议[J];特区经济;2013年09期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 唐海秀;促进我国家庭服务业发展的财税政策研究[D];财政部财政科学研究所;2011年
2 孙莹;俄罗斯经济转轨与经济发展问题研究[D];东北财经大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 杨晓慧;促进我国养老服务业发展的财税政策研究[D];山东财经大学;2016年
2 袁一君;人口老龄化背景下我国养老服务业发展的财税政策研究[D];暨南大学;2016年
3 贾舒凡;促进我国养老事业发展的财税政策研究[D];贵州财经大学;2016年
4 朱远方;促进我国养老服务业发展的财税政策研究[D];暨南大学;2015年
5 赵培培;京津冀一体化背景下养老服务业协同发展研究[D];河北大学;2015年
6 范玉良;我国城市养老社会化服务体系建设的财税政策研究[D];集美大学;2015年
7 曹钧;天津市养老服务业发展的经济财政对策研究[D];天津大学;2010年
,本文编号:1917614
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/1917614.html