当代东南亚华人与印度人比较研究

发布时间：2018-05-23 06:51

本文选题：东南亚 + 华人　；参考：《云南大学》2015年博士论文

【摘要】：民族国家的族群关系,尤其是移民群体在居住国的地位、与本土民族的关系以及与祖籍国的关系,是影响国家和地区安全,乃至全球政治经济格局的一个重要因素。中国和印度,这两大文明古国同为世界资源大国、人口大国,同样也拥有世界最多的海外移民人口,有着巨大的海外投资吸引力。中印两国在人文历史、社会经济、外交关系等方面又有着明显的可比性。东南亚的马来西亚、缅甸、新加坡等国一直是中国人和印度人移居海外的主要目的地。华人和印度人已经分别成为东南亚的第一和第二大移民群体。东南亚的华人和印度人也有着明显的可比性：他们有着相似的移民历史、发展历程、社会地位和经营方式,拥有的财富总量和经济实力都比较大。而且,他们都通过巨额的投资和侨汇与祖籍国保持着比较紧密的联系,越来越多地影响着祖籍国和居住国的社会经济发展,乃至影响到全世界的经济政治格局。但两者之间也存在着显著的差别：印度各移民群体由于语言和文化背景的差异,各族群间往来甚少,甚至互相对抗；与之不同的是,华人社会则以汉语为纽带,以方言为类别,以血缘为基础凝聚在一起,具有浓厚的家乡观念和强烈的认同意识。本论文集中探讨以下三个方面的内容：一、比较研究华人和印度人迁徙东南亚的背景和过程,以及寻求未来更好发展趋势等问题,可在一定程度上促进国际移民理论和东南亚史的研究；二、比较研究华人与印度人在居住国的身份认同、社会组织形式、在东南亚各国社会中所发挥的作用等问题,可为东南亚民族史的研究提供更丰富的内容和更广阔的视角；三、比较研究华人和印度人与居住国政府的关系、与祖籍国的关系,以及他们彼此间的合作与竞争对中印两国关系的影响等问题,可对中印两国以及东南亚各国移民(侨务)政策的研究,对中、印、东南亚各国间关系的研究提供一个新的视角。
[Abstract]:The ethnic relations of the nation and state, especially the status of the immigrant group in the country of residence, the relationship with the native nation and the relationship with the ancestral state, is an important factor affecting the security of the country and the region, and even the global political and economic pattern. China and India, the two ancient civilizations, are also a world resource country and a large population, as well as the world. The largest overseas immigrant population has a huge attraction to overseas investment. China and India have obvious comparability in the aspects of human history, social economy and diplomatic relations. Malaysia, Burma, and Singapore in Southeast Asia have always been the main destinations for the Chinese and Indians to move out of the sea. The first and second major migration groups in Southeast Asia.
The Chinese and Indian people in Southeast Asia also have obvious comparability: they have similar immigrant history, development course, social status and way of operation, their total wealth and economic strength are relatively large. Moreover, they are more and more affected by huge investment and remittances with their ancestral countries. The social and economic development of the ancestral and residential countries and even the economic and political pattern of the world, but there are also significant differences between the two groups: the differences between the different groups of India immigrants, because of the differences in language and culture, are very small and even antagonistic, and the Chinese society is different from that of the Chinese. As a category, it is condensed on the basis of consanguinity and has a strong sense of hometown and a strong sense of identity.
This paper focuses on the following three aspects: first, a comparative study of the background and process of the migration of Chinese and Indians to Southeast Asia and the search for a better future trend can promote the study of the international migration theory and the history of Southeast Asia to a certain extent; and two, to compare the identity of the Chinese and Indians in the country of residence, The form of social organization and the role played in the societies of Southeast Asia can provide more abundant content and broader perspectives for the study of the history of Southeast Asian nationalities. Three, a comparative study of the relationship between Chinese and Indians and the government of the living countries, the relationship with the ancestral state, and the cooperation and competition between them and their relations with China and India. The research on the immigration (Overseas Chinese) policy of China and India and the countries of Southeast Asia can provide a new perspective on the study of the relations between China, India and Southeast Asia.
【学位授予单位】：云南大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D822.3;D634.3

【参考文献】