城市养老服务要走“社区化”道路——来自753位城市老年人的实证研究

发布时间：2018-06-01 05:22

本文选题：城市老年人 + 城市养老服务　；参考：《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》2017年02期

【摘要】：城市养老服务是提升城市老年人生活质量的基本保证。城市养老服务究竟要选择何种模式,这是学术界迄今尚未解决的问题。实证研究结果表明:一是老年人希望能在社区养老和由社区来养老,老年人在社区养老的效用和成本效用比明显高于在机构养老;二是社区养老的老年人普遍对政府、社区和志愿服务的满意度偏低;三是城市养老服务体系尚是一种残补体系,政府主导的城市养老服务主要关注点在于民政对象和一些政府力推的示范性社区,而很少关注患有慢性疾病、收入低和受教育程度低的老年人;四是政府靠外力推动的社区养老服务体系不具有可持续性和可复制性。因此,城市养老服务应该走“社区化”道路,建立以增强社区养老服务能力为基础的整合网络。
[Abstract]:Urban old-age service is the basic guarantee to improve the quality of life of the elderly in the city. Which mode of urban old-age service should be chosen is an unsolved problem in academic circles. The empirical results show that: first, the elderly want to provide for the aged in the community and by the community, the utility and cost utility ratio of the elderly in the community is obviously higher than that in the institutional care; second, the elderly in the community generally care for the government. The satisfaction degree of community and voluntary service is on the low side; third, the urban old-age service system is still a kind of residual compensation system, the main focus of the government-led urban old-age service is the civil affairs object and some demonstration communities pushed by the government. However, little attention is paid to the elderly with chronic diseases, low income and low education. Fourth, the community pension service system promoted by the government by external force is not sustainable and replicable. Therefore, the urban old-age service should follow the road of "community" and establish an integrated network based on enhancing the ability of community pension service.
【作者单位】：江西财经大学公共政策与社会治理研究中心;湖南师范大学马克思主义学院;

【相似文献】