龙岗区“村改社”社区治理权责配置存在的问题及对策研究

发布时间：2018-06-16 23:27

  本文选题：社区 + 社区治理　； 参考：《湘潭大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：社区作为最基层的社会治理要素,其功能涵盖组织居民效度化自治以及实现自身良性发展,同时,藉由政府部分管理职能向社区的让渡,使得现今社区日益成为创设系统化的社会治理机制以及提升政府社会治理效能的关键介质。现阶段,深圳市龙岗区在推行集体村镇向社区转型过程中,普遍设立社区工作站、社区股份合作公司、社区综合党委、社区居民委员会等四套机构体系。在权责配置现状方面,社区工作站主要承接政府行政管理职能,以检查、审批、登记和确认性职权为主,具有浓厚的行政性色彩。社区股份合作公司以企业经营管理职权为主,涉及公司业务经营、财务管理、人事管理与物业管理等领域,由于掌握社区运行所必需的经济资源和人事资源,在社区治理中实际发挥着主导作用。社区综合党委以内部党务管理职权为主,主要负责党组织内部运作和管理,负责党员的日常思想教育。社区居委会则涉及权责事项相对较少,以行使确认性职权为主,负责为社区居民开具各类“证明”和“认定”。总体来看,龙岗区“村改社”社区基层各个工作机构之间的权责配置是历史形成的,权责配置相对失衡,没有体现出当初制度设计所作的目标要求。本文通过深入社区实地调查研究,系统了解社区各工作机构主要工作事项及其权责配置情况,在已知龙岗区基层治理中存在社区内组织之间的关系不顺、社区工作站定性不清、社区资源配置失衡、社区居委会边缘化以及居民参与普遍不足等问题的前提下,对这些问题进行更全面、更深层次的剖析。同时,立足于公共治理的理论,从社区内设的党委、居委会、股份制合作公司以及基层社区工作站等四个工作机构的角度出发,对优化龙岗区“村改社”社区治理中的权责配置提出具有针对性、可行性的对策建议。
[Abstract]:As the most basic elements of social governance, the functions of community include organizing residents' validity autonomy and realizing their own benign development, and at the same time, transferring part of government management functions to the community. Nowadays, the community is becoming the key medium to establish the systematic social governance mechanism and to improve the efficiency of the government's social governance. At present, in the process of the transformation from collective village to community in Longgang District of Shenzhen City, four organizational systems, such as community workstation, community stock cooperative company, community comprehensive party committee and community resident committee, are generally set up. In the present situation of the allocation of power and responsibility, the community workstations mainly undertake the functions of government administration, which mainly focus on inspection, examination and approval, registration and confirmation, and have a strong administrative color. Community stock cooperative companies are mainly concerned with the power of enterprise management and business operations, including business operations, financial management, personnel management, property management, etc., because of mastering the economic and personnel resources necessary for the operation of the community, In community governance is actually playing a leading role. The community comprehensive party committee is mainly responsible for the internal operation and management of the Party organization and for the daily ideological education of the party members. On the other hand, the community neighborhood committee is responsible for issuing all kinds of "certificates" and "cognizance" for community residents because of its relatively few rights and responsibilities. On the whole, the allocation of power and responsibility among the grass-roots organizations in the community of Longgang District "Village Reform Society" is a historical formation, and the allocation of power and responsibility is relatively unbalanced, which does not reflect the target requirements of the original system design. Through in-depth community investigation and research, this paper systematically understands the main work items and the allocation of powers and responsibilities of the community working organizations. It is known that the relationship between community organizations in the grass-roots governance of Longgang district is not smooth, and the quality of community workstations is unclear. On the premise of the imbalance of community resource allocation, the marginalization of community neighborhood committee and the general insufficiency of residents' participation, this paper makes a more comprehensive and deeper analysis of these problems. At the same time, based on the theory of public governance, from the perspective of the four working organizations, namely, party committees, neighborhood committees, joint-stock cooperative companies and grass-roots community workstations, established in the community, Some countermeasures and suggestions are put forward to optimize the allocation of power and responsibility in the community management of "Village Reform Society" in Longgang District.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D422.6;D669.3
，

本文编号：2028496