当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 国际关系论文 >

我国地方政府与民营企业非规范交换关系研究

发布时间:2018-06-26 11:58

  本文选题:政企关系 + 政企交换 ; 参考:《浙江财经大学》2015年硕士论文


【摘要】:政府和企业作为经济社会中的两大运行组织,二者之间的互动关系是社会权力结构中十分重要的部分。理解了一个国家的政企关系,也就从宏观上把握了这个国家的经济结构。改革开放三十多年以来,我国社会和经济得到了快速的发展,一批民营企业伴随改革的进程逐步发展壮大,其发展态势与我国经济结构的调整紧密相关。目前我国仍处于政府主导的市场经济体系之中,政府对经济的干预力度较大,市场化程度不足的问题也体现在政企关系上,在促进经济市场化的进程中,理顺政企关系是处理政府与市场关系的重点。 政府在国家政治、经济、社会方面发挥着多重作用决定了其必然成为企业最重要的环境因素,也是企业最重要的利益相关者之一。我国长期以来实行的是政府主导型经济发展模式,政府在资源配置中有举足轻重的作用。因此,如何与政府打交道,如何处理与政府的关系自然就成为企业在经营中面临的主要问题之一,企业的政治行为就随之而来。另一方面,我国本来就是一个注重关系的人情社会,企业与政府的关系更是密切。正是在这种背景下,政府与企业的互动中,难免会出现不规范的行为,比如政商勾结已导致严重的腐败问题。当前的腐败案件,特别是严重的经济犯罪案件中,地方政府官员与民营企业家勾结、利用导致国家经济财产遭受损失,这一类案件已经占到官员腐败案件的很大一部分。可见由于我国社会依旧处于转型期,市场机制尚待健全,社会利益分化加剧,在企业与政府的互动中不可避免地会潜藏违法、违纪及有悖于社会公德的交易,衍生出大量的企业不当政治行为,使企业政治行为的应然性空间与实然性空间存在背离,这就构成本文研究的主题——地方政府与民营企业之间的非规范交换问题。 本文从交换理论的视角入手,首先界定了非规范交换的概念,列举了非规范交换的几种表现形式,接着分别从交换理论、政府俘获理论和地方法团主义三个理论角度对非规范交换的概念加以说明。在上述理论分析的基础上,结合我国民营企业发展现状,对非规范政企交换行为的机制进行深入分析,归纳出其发生的原因和带来的危害,以政府主导的非规范交换——无锡尚德破产重整和企业主导的非规范交换——皇明太阳能案例作为实证分析部分,进一步验证上述几章的分析结果。最后,在规范政企交换关系的对策和建议方面,本文认为应转变地方政府政绩观和考核办法,建立政府自律机制和企业自律机制。建立完善的市场机制,使企业成为真正意义上的市场主体。从政府角度来看,应当简政放权、转变职能,回归提供公共服务和公共物品的角色本位,,规范行政自由裁量权的运用。从企业的角度来看,应当进一步完善治理结构,提高企业自主创新能力,并积极承担社会责任。从整个社会的他律体系来看,政企交换关系的规范离不开企业利益相关者的监督和约束,非规范政企交换的惩处机制也亟待建立。
[Abstract]:The government and enterprise as the two operating organizations in the economic society, the interactive relationship between the two is a very important part of the social power structure. Understanding the relationship between government and enterprise in a country has also grasped the economic structure of the country from the macro level. With the reform and opening up for more than 30 years, the society and economy of our country have been rapidly developed. The development trend of a group of private enterprises is gradually growing with the process of reform. The development trend is closely related to the adjustment of the economic structure of our country. At present, our country is still in the market economy system dominated by the government, the government has a great intervention in the economy, and the problem of the lack of marketization is also embodied in the relationship between the government and the enterprise, and promotes the economic marketization. In the process, straightening out the relationship between government and enterprises is the key to deal with the relationship between the government and the market.
The government plays a multiple role in the political, economic and social aspects of the country, which determines that it is the most important environmental factor and one of the most important stakeholders of the enterprise. China has long implemented a government led economic development model, and the government plays an important role in the allocation of resources. Therefore, how to do with the government How to deal with the relationship with the government naturally becomes one of the main problems that the enterprise faces, and the political behavior of the enterprise is followed. On the other hand, our country is a human society which pays attention to the relationship, and the relationship between the enterprise and the government is more closely. It is in this context that the interaction between the government and the enterprise is unavoidable. In the current corruption cases, especially in the serious economic crime cases, local government officials collude with private entrepreneurs and make use of the loss of national economic property. This kind of case has already accounted for a large part of the official corruption cases. In our country, the society is still in the transition period, the market mechanism remains to be improved and the differentiation of social interests is aggravated. In the interaction of the enterprise and the government, the illegal, disciplinary and contrary to the social ethics are inevitably hidden, and a large number of improper political actions have been derived from the enterprise. This constitutes the theme of this study -- the non-standard exchange between local governments and private enterprises.
Starting with the perspective of exchange theory, this paper first defines the concept of nonstandard exchange, lists several forms of non normative exchange, and then explains the concept of nonstandard exchange from three angles of exchange theory, government capture theory and local corporatism. On the basis of the above theoretical analysis, it combines with my people. The current situation of enterprise development and the mechanism of non standard government and enterprise exchange behavior are deeply analyzed, and the causes and hazards are summed up. The non standard exchange dominated by the government - the Wuxi Suntech bankruptcy reorganization and the non standard exchange of enterprise led by the enterprise -- the case of Emperor Ming solar energy as an empirical analysis part, to further verify the above In the end, in the aspect of standardizing the countermeasures and suggestions of the relationship between government and enterprise exchange, this paper thinks that we should change the local government's political achievements and assessment methods, establish the self-discipline mechanism of the government and the self-discipline mechanism of the enterprise, establish a perfect market mechanism to make the enterprises become the real market main body. From the point of view of the government, the government should simply release power, Change functions, return to the role of public service and public goods, standardize the use of administrative discretion. From the point of view of enterprise, we should further improve the governance structure, improve the ability of independent innovation of enterprises, and actively undertake social responsibility. From the perspective of the whole society, the regulation of the relationship between government and enterprise can not be separated from enterprises. The supervision and restriction of industry stakeholders, and the punishment mechanism of non-standard exchange between government and enterprises need to be established.
【学位授予单位】:浙江财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D625;F276.5

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 胡松;罗辉;;博弈论视角下我国政府与企业的关系[J];当代经济;2009年01期

2 胡旭阳;史晋川;;民营企业的政治资源与民营企业多元化投资——以中国民营企业500强为例[J];中国工业经济;2008年04期

3 邬爱其;金宝敏;;个人地位、企业发展、社会责任与制度风险:中国民营企业家政治参与动机的研究[J];中国工业经济;2008年07期

4 谭劲松,郑国坚;产权安排、治理机制、政企关系与企业效率——以“科龙”和“美的”为例[J];管理世界;2004年02期

5 魏开华;;从无锡尚德案例看商业银行贷款的行业风险防范[J];当代经济管理;2013年07期

6 程明;王菲;张维鹏;;制度悖论下政府扶持的民营企业自主创新研究——基于无锡尚德电力的实证研究[J];当代经济;2013年23期

7 彭迈;;从政企关系“潜规则”透视我国政企关系的模式缺陷[J];河南司法警官职业学院学报;2007年02期

8 肖微;方X;;基于博弈论思维框架的政府与企业关系重塑——从“囚徒困境”到“智猪博弈”的策略选择[J];华中农业大学学报(社会科学版);2009年01期

9 朱鸿伟;政企关系的国际比较及启示[J];南方经济;2003年01期

10 郭剑花;;高管参政议政与民营企业雇员行为——基于政企关系的现实考察[J];经济体制改革;2012年05期



本文编号:2070316

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/2070316.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户5eb4a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com