当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 国际关系论文 >

自传体叙述与身份进化的动力:克罗地亚与塞尔维亚的欧洲化进程比较研究

发布时间:2018-07-16 20:48
【摘要】:本文的研究主要围绕一个核心问题展开:在加入欧盟所带来的巨大收益预期诱导下,为什么有些国家总是充满热情的向着欧盟集体身份转变和进化,并呈现一种身份聚合的动力,而有些国家则始终不愿完全实现自我身份的欧洲化转变和进化,反而形成一种身份分离的动力呢?先前关于欧洲化的研究分别是以物质或观念为理论基础,,以此建构不同的理论模型。以物质主义为基础的理论缺乏对身份认同、话语等观念性因素的重视,偏向于关注对欧洲化进程中欧盟层面的权力以及入盟所带来的利益等相关因素的研究,而以观念为基础的理论虽然避免了以简单的成本-收益为基础的分析视角,但是与物质主义一样,这类理论同样秉持的是结构主义分析,没有将国家这个“黑箱”彻底打开,也就不能清晰地阐述国家自身对欧盟和欧洲化进程的认知,进而忽视了“内因”的基础作用。因此,这些理论框架都不能对本文所提出的研究问题提出恰当的解释。基于这些理论的不足,本文提出了自传体叙述与身份进化的动力这一分析框架,在此基础上展开理论假设,并利用塞尔维亚和克罗地亚两国的欧洲化进程进行案例分析。 本文所提出的分析框架认为,国家的自传体叙述在影响自我身份建构和认同他者的进程中起到了关键的作用。自传体叙述不仅建构了自我的身份而且也影响了国家对自我和他者的认知。因此在某个国家或组织认同并接受其他国家或组织的过程中,该国或这个组织的自传体叙述会对这一进程产生关键性的影响。本文将这一进程假定为一种身份进化的进程,也即由于自我对他者认同的提升使得自我的身份定位朝向他者群体成员身份聚合的话语实践过程。为了更加清晰地理解国家自传体叙述的构成内容及其对身份进化动力的影响,本文依据国家身份建构理论和广义叙述学的相关知识,将构成国家的自传体叙述分为三个维度,即抽象层面的神话叙述,政治精英层面的叙述操控以及社会大众层面的历史教育。每个维度都能独立的影响到自我对他者的认知效果和身份进化的动力,同时三个层面也是相互联系的过程,抽象层面的神话叙述为政治精英层面的叙述操控提供了背景知识和叙述素材,同时通过历史教育使国家的叙述内容和叙述思想进一步深入社会大众,并形成一种国民意识和国家性。由于不同国家对于同一种认同进程可能存在不同的自传体叙述,因此,不同的国家对于像欧洲化这样的议程可能采取不同的态度。为此,本文将国家的身份进化分为两种进程效果,即身份聚合与身份分离。两种进程效果分别代表了身份进化中存在的两种动力,而动力差异的来源就在于国家自传体叙述的影响。 论文选择以塞尔维亚和克罗地亚的欧洲化进程作为案例进行验证。由于历史上曾经同处一个国家,因此这两个国家在许多方面都具有相同之处,虽然具有这些历史共同点,但是他们的欧洲化路径却出现了截然不同的进程。为此本文依据理论部分的分析框架,对自传体叙述的三个维度依次进行了分析,并分别对三个维度如何影响这两个国家向欧盟集体成员资格身份进化的动力过程进行了研究。通过详细的论证,本文证实了此项研究所提出的理论假设和变量之间的因果性。
[Abstract]:This study focuses on a core issue: why some countries are always passionate about the transformation and evolution of the European Union's collective identity and the impetus for the identity polymerization, while some countries are not willing to fully realize their self identity Europeanization at the beginning. Instead of changing and evolving, instead of forming a power of identity separation, previous studies on Europeanization were based on material or concept as the theoretical basis to construct different theoretical models. The theory based on materialism lacks the emphasis on identity, discourse and other conceptual factors, and is biased towards the EU layer in the process of Europeanization. The research on the related factors such as the power and the benefits brought by the union, while the concept based theory avoids the simple cost income based analysis perspective, but like materialism, this kind of theory also holds the structural analysis, and does not completely open the "black box" of the country. A clear explanation of the state's own awareness of the European Union and the Europeanization process, and the neglect of the underlying role of "internal cause". Therefore, these theoretical frameworks can not give a proper explanation of the research issues proposed in this article. Based on the shortcomings of these theories, this paper proposes an analytical framework for the motive force of autobiographical narration and identity evolution. On this basis, the theoretical assumptions are developed, and the Europeanization process of Serbia and Croatia is used for case analysis.
The analytical framework proposed in this paper holds that the state's autobiographical narrative plays a key role in the process of influencing self identity construction and identifying others. The autobiographical narrative not only constructs the identity of the self but also affects the state's cognition of the self and the other. In the process of organization, the autobiographical narration of the country or the organization will have a critical impact on this process. This process is assumed to be a process of identity evolution, that is, the process of discourse practice in which self identity is directed towards the other group as a result of the promotion of self identity. A clear understanding of the composition of national autobiographical narration and its influence on the dynamics of identity evolution will be divided into three dimensions based on the theory of national identity construction and the related knowledge of general narratology, which constitute the state's autobiographical narration, that is, the myth narrative at the level of abstraction, the narrative manipulation of the political elite level and the social public level. Every dimension can affect the cognitive effect of self and the power of identity evolution independently. At the same time, the three levels are also interconnected. The abstract level of mythological narrative provides the background knowledge and narrative material for the narrative manipulation of the political elite level, while making the national narrative through historical education. The idea of capacity and narration further penetrates the public and forms a national consciousness and national nature. Since different countries may have different autobiographical descriptions of the same identification process, different countries may take different states of state for such agendas such as Europeanization. Therefore, this article divides the state's identity evolution into two The effect of the process is identity polymerization and identity separation. The two process effects represent the two motive forces in the identity evolution, and the source of the dynamic difference lies in the influence of the national autobiographical narrative.
The thesis chooses the Europeanization process of Serbia and Croatia as a case study. Because of the history of the same country, the two countries have similarities in many aspects. Although they have these common points of history, their Europeanization paths have different processes. This article is based on this article. The analytical framework of the theoretical part analyses the three dimensions of the autobiographical narrative in turn, and studies how the three dimensions influence the dynamic process of the evolution of the two countries to the EU collective membership. Through the detailed argument, this paper confirms the theoretical hypothesis and the cause of the variables proposed by the study. Fruit character.
【学位授予单位】:外交学院
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D755.53;D754.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 林民旺;朱立群;;国际规范的国内化:国内结构的影响及传播机制[J];当代亚太;2011年01期

2 王晓升;科学知识和叙事知识及其关系——利奥塔对后现代知识状况的分析及其启示[J];电子科技大学学报(社科版);2001年01期

3 秦亚青;;作为关系过程的国际社会——制度、身份与中国和平崛起[J];国际政治科学;2010年04期

4 李俊;“大塞尔维亚主义”的兴衰及其影响[J];国际资料信息;2000年11期

5 朱立群;;欧洲一体化理论:研究问题、路径与特点[J];国际政治研究;2008年04期

6 聂文娟;;现代语言建构主义及“实践性”的缺失[J];国际政治研究;2010年04期

7 白伊维;;欧洲主义与民族主义的较量:克罗地亚社民党的演变[J];当代世界与社会主义;2013年03期

8 赵文城;;克罗地亚的悠悠独立梦[J];世界博览;1996年02期

9 彼得·豪尔,罗斯玛丽·泰勒,何俊智;政治科学与三个新制度主义[J];经济社会体制比较;2003年05期

10 应星;;略论叙事在中国社会研究中的运用及其限制[J];江苏行政学院学报;2006年03期



本文编号:2127630

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/2127630.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户33736***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com