论21世纪政治秩序下反恐战争的特殊性
[Abstract]:This article first compares the political order of the public system, the political order of the king system, the territorial political order and the terrorist organization under the national political order: the coexistence of the king public state and the fanatical religious mercenaries; the king system and the pirates enter into the golden age of colonization; the territorial state and the international anarchist; the national state. Trying to suppress the national liberation movement. By studying the characteristics of every different political order and its terrorist organization, we find that different political orders have different characteristics of the times. These characteristics also reflect the terrorism of this age. That is to say, terrorism is the product of different political order, the horror of different times. It also reflects the characteristics of the political order in this era. From the beginning of the twenty-first Century, with the change of the economic and political order, the terrorism and the war against terrorism in twenty-first Century also have the characteristics of the political order of the twenty-first Century. The independent enterprise system created the motive force for the society and the economy, and the mode of the outsourcing economy permeated. Every link of globalized production; the global economy has turned into a wave of "information" and "high-tech". Accordingly, terrorism in the twenty-first Century also conforms to the political order of the twenty-first Century, with the help of the marketization of weapons of mass destruction and the globalization of information networks as "fictitious countries", which are more threatening and lethal. As an example, the conflict between the public political order, the political order of the king system, the territorial political order and the national and national political order, the bandits, the robbers, the feudalism or the religion, is usually called the "struggle", but not the "war". However, in the twenty-first Century political rank, the Al Qaeda and other terrorism were the size and shape of the "virtual country". In addition, terrorist organizations in the twenty-first Century political order are usually outsourced to regional organizations. Terrorism will be outsourced to local organizations to provide services, infrastructure and planning, implementation of complex and professional financial activities, planning arrangements, and weapon training. In addition, from 2001. The death rate of the terrorist organization began to rise significantly, and it tended to launch multiple violent attacks at the same time. The terrorist organizations in the national state were mainly different from the national leadership, and the terrorist organizations in twenty-first Century wanted to attract social attention by making massive mass casualties and economic losses. Such attacks could cause international concern. Media concerns better achieve the global goal of Al Qaida. In financing, terrorism in the twenty-first Century, like this political order, is international, networked, and decentralized, and also dependent on outsourcing and the global economy. Terrorist organizations are no longer a mere agency of the country and become allies of some countries. Terrorism has been supported and supported by the state, and terrorism is now dependent on the supply and demand network of the international network of terrorism to meet its needs. There is a clear distinction between the distance and the commanding officer. There is a clear distinction between the fighters and the civilians. In the war in the territorial state, civilian casualties are basically negligible. In twenty-first Century, the terrorist organization hoped to create mass casualties and economic losses to attract social attention. Such a attack could be cited. With the attention of the international media, the global goal of Al Qaida is better. Therefore, the death of civilians in twenty-first Century is no longer a "collateral damage", and it has become the main target of terrorist attacks, and the battlefield is also transferred to the busy city center. In addition, the definition of victory in the war against terrorism has changed. This article takes the Iraq war as an example to analyze Iraq The first battle of the war ended in an awkward position. The main reason was that the coalition did not realize that the war of the twenty-first Century and the traditional war were different, and that the war strategy and the legal order were not adjusted according to these particularity. For example, the characteristics of the war in Iraq were dominated by deterrence rather than by the protection of civilians. In the end, the country should make the strategic adjustment of counter-terrorism according to the characteristics of its own and terrorism. First of all, we should take the protection of civilians as the primary task. The transformation of the post war social stability and reconstruction of the economy requires the restructuring of the army's structure, equipment and training, as well as the cooperation of civil institutions such as the NGOs, the border doctors and the Red Cross. In addition, it is necessary to prevent the implementation of terrorist activities and use economic and trade prohibitions or restrictions on trade. In the end, the activities and anti terrorist activities of the terrorist organization in twenty-first Century are regarded as "war", and the "criminal / international law" and "Military" means will be needed to combat the terror of twenty-first Century more efficiently. Organization.
【学位授予单位】:北京外国语大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D815.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 汤本;旁观美国反恐战争[J];南风窗;2003年03期
2 畅征;对美国三年反恐战争的评析[J];领导科学;2004年18期
3 王存刚;当前反恐战争的困境及其原因分析[J];东南亚研究;2005年04期
4 马相武;;美国打赢反恐战争了吗?[J];国际资料信息;2007年11期
5 王伟光;;《中国反恐战争》评介[J];国外社会科学;2010年01期
6 王丰丰;;反恐战争何以越反越恐[J];党政论坛(干部文摘);2010年10期
7 林利民,袁鹏,杨明杰,刀书林,方金英,冯仲平,陈凤英;反恐战争及其战略后果分析[J];现代国际关系;2001年11期
8 荣鹰;反恐战争与地区形势[J];国际问题研究;2002年04期
9 任国军;;孙子兵法与反恐战争[J];现代兵器;2003年06期
10 韩秀琪;美国反恐战争不对称性及其后果[J];中共中央党校学报;2004年01期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 范鸿达;;反恐战争视野下的东南亚伊斯兰[A];厦门大学南洋研究院50周年庆暨“当代东南亚政治与外交”学术研讨会大会手册[C];2006年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 于海洋;美国反恐战争的三大战略错误[N];国防时报;2010年
2 记者 李学梅;反恐战争沦为美国“鸡肋”[N];新华每日电讯;2013年
3 本报驻联合国记者 袁博;二号嫌疑人:“不满”美国发动反恐战争[N];文汇报;2013年
4 记者 王玉凤;26国明确支持美空袭“伊斯兰国” 新一轮反恐战争开启[N];第一财经日报;2014年
5 刘淄川;美国为何不再提“反恐战争”?[N];经济观察报;2014年
6 严圣禾;日本撤回在印度洋支援反恐战争的军舰[N];光明日报;2007年
7 ;奥巴马政府停用“反恐战争”表述[N];新华每日电讯;2009年
8 钟声;反恐战争同样需要“讲规矩”[N];人民日报;2011年
9 中国社科院亚太所学者 叶海林;无话可说的反恐战争[N];东方早报;2012年
10 孙维国;打赢反恐战争需要全民参与[N];人民公安报;2014年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 玛斯拉(Maseray Ngadie Rogers);美国在阿富汗反恐战争的政治影响(1998-2008)[D];吉林大学;2011年
2 金豪洙;美国精英评论与反恐战争:构架方法[D];复旦大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 郭相岑;论21世纪政治秩序下反恐战争的特殊性[D];北京外国语大学;2017年
2 于浩;美国“反恐战争”的宗教因素解析[D];山东师范大学;2012年
3 杨茗;乔治·W·布什政府反恐战争中的“自由”[D];四川外语学院;2012年
4 赵世人;从美国的“反恐战争”看反恐国际法建设问题[D];外交学院;2005年
5 麦克(Michael Tegegne Alemneh);全球反恐战争战略:2000年以来非洲之角的案例分析[D];吉林大学;2010年
6 陈来平;美国反恐战争背后的能源考量探析[D];外交学院;2012年
7 吴长宇;论美国在阿富汗的反恐战争[D];新疆大学;2011年
8 李强;美国在反恐战争中的军政冲突及其协调[D];国防科学技术大学;2010年
9 雷云;阿富汗反恐战争与巴基斯坦安全政策变化的研究——动因、影响与评估[D];复旦大学;2010年
10 魏艺;美国反恐战争背后的文化冲突解读[D];西南石油大学;2012年
,本文编号:2129292
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/2129292.html