唐宋变革论的误解与正解——仅以言必称内藤及会通论等为例
发布时间：2018-08-07 12:04
【摘要】：唐宋变革是个较为复杂的论题,只怕很难以"对"或"错"一字蔽之。唐宋变革论各式各样,然而如今学者每提及唐宋变革论,大有言必称内藤湖南之势。其实,日本学界有京都学派与东京学派之分,并非"内藤假说"一统天下。尤其值得注意的是,我国学者有自己的唐宋变革论,且源远流长,岂能数典忘祖。唐宋变革不是断裂,而是因革。包伟民新近提出的唐宋会通论,对唐宋变革论不是颠覆,而是补充和完善。唐宋变革论与会通论相辅相成、兼容互补、相得益彰。
[Abstract]:The change of Tang and Song dynasties is a complicated topic, but it is difficult to correct or wrong. The Tang and Song dynasties change theory is various, but now scholars every mention of Tang and Song Dynasty change theory, great speech must be called Neito Hunan trend. As a matter of fact, Japanese scholars are divided into Kyoto school and Tokyo school, not the Nito hypothesis. It is especially noteworthy that Chinese scholars have their own theory of change in the Tang and Song dynasties, and have a long history. The revolution in Tang and Song dynasties was not a rupture, but a revolution. The general theory of Tang and Song Dynasty put forward recently by Bao Weimin is not subversive, but complementary and perfect to the theory of change in Tang and Song dynasties. Tang and Song dynasties change theory participation complementary, compatible and complementary, mutually reinforcing.
【作者单位】： 四川师范大学历史文化与旅游学院;
【分类号】：D691.2
，
本文编号：2169964
[Abstract]:The change of Tang and Song dynasties is a complicated topic, but it is difficult to correct or wrong. The Tang and Song dynasties change theory is various, but now scholars every mention of Tang and Song Dynasty change theory, great speech must be called Neito Hunan trend. As a matter of fact, Japanese scholars are divided into Kyoto school and Tokyo school, not the Nito hypothesis. It is especially noteworthy that Chinese scholars have their own theory of change in the Tang and Song dynasties, and have a long history. The revolution in Tang and Song dynasties was not a rupture, but a revolution. The general theory of Tang and Song Dynasty put forward recently by Bao Weimin is not subversive, but complementary and perfect to the theory of change in Tang and Song dynasties. Tang and Song dynasties change theory participation complementary, compatible and complementary, mutually reinforcing.
【作者单位】： 四川师范大学历史文化与旅游学院;
【分类号】：D691.2
，
本文编号：2169964
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/2169964.html
