全国人大常委会“试点授权”要素论——基于《立法法》第13条的规范性思考
发布时间：2018-11-17 11:37
【摘要】：全国人大常委会的"试点授权"为改革试点突破现行规定提供了法律依据,成为了"重大改革于法有据"的示范性举措;然而,其示范意义不应流于为相关改革提供形式依据,其内容自身首先应符合法律规定及其所蕴含的法律原理。衡量"试点授权"是否实质性"于法有据",可从四类要素分析:从权限要素看,"试点授权"应限于非宪法保留事项和常委会自身有立法权限的事项;从时间要素看,应先于试点改革而作出,并符合授权期限;从后果要素看,"试点授权"到期之后根据试点情况而发生试点推广、变更或延长等不同法律后果;空间要素上,授权空间在范围上具有部分性以及与授权事项的关联性。
[Abstract]:The "pilot authorization" of the standing Committee of the National people's Congress provides the legal basis for the reform to break through the existing regulations, and has become an exemplary measure of "major reform on the basis of law". However, its demonstrative significance should not be a formal basis for the relevant reform, and its content itself should first accord with the legal provisions and the legal principles contained therein. To measure whether the "pilot authorization" is substantial "according to the law" can be analyzed from four kinds of elements: from the view of the competence factor, the "pilot authorization" should be limited to the non-constitutional reservation and the matters with the standing Committee's own legislative competence; From the point of view of the time factor, it should be made before the pilot reform and accord with the period of authorization; from the point of view of the consequence factor, different legal consequences such as extension, modification or extension of the pilot should occur according to the situation of the pilot project after the expiration of the "pilot authorization"; In the space element, the authorization space has the partial character in the scope and the correlation with the authorization item.
【作者单位】： 浙江大学光华法学院;2011计划司法文明协同创新中心;清华大学法学院;
【基金】：国家2011计划司法文明协同创新中心研究成果 国家社科青年项目《全国人大常委会监督权行使机制研究》(批准号:10CFX005)成果
【分类号】：D622;D921
本文编号：2337646
[Abstract]:The "pilot authorization" of the standing Committee of the National people's Congress provides the legal basis for the reform to break through the existing regulations, and has become an exemplary measure of "major reform on the basis of law". However, its demonstrative significance should not be a formal basis for the relevant reform, and its content itself should first accord with the legal provisions and the legal principles contained therein. To measure whether the "pilot authorization" is substantial "according to the law" can be analyzed from four kinds of elements: from the view of the competence factor, the "pilot authorization" should be limited to the non-constitutional reservation and the matters with the standing Committee's own legislative competence; From the point of view of the time factor, it should be made before the pilot reform and accord with the period of authorization; from the point of view of the consequence factor, different legal consequences such as extension, modification or extension of the pilot should occur according to the situation of the pilot project after the expiration of the "pilot authorization"; In the space element, the authorization space has the partial character in the scope and the correlation with the authorization item.
【作者单位】： 浙江大学光华法学院;2011计划司法文明协同创新中心;清华大学法学院;
【基金】：国家2011计划司法文明协同创新中心研究成果 国家社科青年项目《全国人大常委会监督权行使机制研究》(批准号:10CFX005)成果
【分类号】：D622;D921
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 廖加龙;;日本的授权立法和立法中的公众参与[J];人大研究;2014年05期
2 李炜光;;人大应当怎么授权?[J];民主与科学;2007年05期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 李林;英国议会及政府的立法权限[N];学习时报;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 何嘉飞;全国人大常委会中止实施法律研究[D];广东财经大学;2016年
，本文编号：2337646
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/2337646.html
