反思启蒙与面向中国现实
发布时间：2018-12-12 18:42
【摘要】：现代西方文明作为启蒙的载体和呈现方式,一方面在世界历史范围内高歌猛进,另一方面却也表现出同质化、模具化的反启蒙特征。回顾中国近代以来的思想启蒙,往往缺乏现实的态度和实践的维度,不是救亡压倒启蒙,而是启蒙脱离救亡。马克思对启蒙传统的扬弃,为我们提供了深刻的哲学基础。从现实的人及其历史发展出发,从客观条件和具体实践出发,理性的自我规定终需接受实践的检验。在中国革命、建设和改革进程中,"实事求是"是马克思主义哲学实践第一观点的中国化表述。辩证思维不同于纯粹思辨,实践理性不同于启蒙理性。只有面向中国现实,以我们正在做的事情为中心,才能提供"中国方案",引领"时代潮流"。
[Abstract]:Modern Western civilization as the carrier and presentation of enlightenment, on the one hand, in the world history, on the other hand, it also shows the anti-enlightenment characteristics of homogenization and mold. Looking back on the ideological enlightenment in modern China, we often lack the realistic attitude and practical dimension. It is not the salvation over the enlightenment, but the enlightenment separated from the salvation. Marx's sublation of enlightenment tradition provides us with a profound philosophical foundation. From the point of reality and its historical development, from the objective conditions and concrete practice, rational self-regulation must be tested by practice. In the process of Chinese revolution, construction and reform, seeking truth from facts is the Chinese expression of the first viewpoint of Marxist philosophy practice. Dialectical thinking is different from pure speculation, practical rationality is different from enlightenment reason. Only by facing the reality of China and focusing on what we are doing can we provide the China solution and lead the trend of the times.
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学院哲学研究所;
【分类号】：D61
本文编号：2375106
[Abstract]:Modern Western civilization as the carrier and presentation of enlightenment, on the one hand, in the world history, on the other hand, it also shows the anti-enlightenment characteristics of homogenization and mold. Looking back on the ideological enlightenment in modern China, we often lack the realistic attitude and practical dimension. It is not the salvation over the enlightenment, but the enlightenment separated from the salvation. Marx's sublation of enlightenment tradition provides us with a profound philosophical foundation. From the point of reality and its historical development, from the objective conditions and concrete practice, rational self-regulation must be tested by practice. In the process of Chinese revolution, construction and reform, seeking truth from facts is the Chinese expression of the first viewpoint of Marxist philosophy practice. Dialectical thinking is different from pure speculation, practical rationality is different from enlightenment reason. Only by facing the reality of China and focusing on what we are doing can we provide the China solution and lead the trend of the times.
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学院哲学研究所;
【分类号】：D61
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 佚名;“权力中产”的中国现实[J];中国社会导刊;2005年06期
2 安然;;小胖墩的中国现实[J];中国新闻周刊;2006年22期
3 ;《碰撞——全球化陷阱与中国现实选择》问世引人瞩目[J];文艺理论与批评;2000年02期
4 党国英;民主政治的动力:国际经验与中国现实[J];战略与管理;2003年05期
5 ;中国不高兴?友邦很“惊诧”[J];世界博览;2009年08期
6 何三畏;;网络使“两会”成为全民参与的节日[J];南方人物周刊;2010年10期
7 甘敬东;;脚踏中国现实的大地——关于我国社会正处在社会主义初级阶段的对话[J];党政论坛;1988年04期
8 双传学;毛俊;;论社会主义核心价值体系的价值[J];南京师大学报(社会科学版);2014年02期
9 吴忠民;;中国现代化的基本走势及问题——对1978年以来中国现代化进程的宏观考察[J];社会科学战线;1993年02期
10 包志国;;公平正义视角下的当前中国现实困境[J];宜春学院学报;2013年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 李佑新 湘潭大学毛泽东思想研究中心;建构理想与现实的合理张力[N];中国社会科学报;2012年
2 复旦大学马克思主义研究院 林青 祁涛;马克思主义要切中当今中国现实[N];中国社会科学报;2014年
，本文编号：2375106
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/2375106.html
