西方实践哲学视阈下的公共行政实践泛技术化之省察

发布时间：2018-05-17 16:21

本文选题：实践哲学 + 公共行政　；参考：《社会科学研究》2013年01期

【摘要】：西方实践哲学的两大传统为辨明公共行政实践概念的实质与分析提供了一种新视角。不同于亚里士多德的道德实践传统,培根的技术实践传统主张对科学理论的经验化、技术化、工具化的强调以及将实践视为科学理论的现实应用与结果,构成了分析现代性公共行政实践的哲学依据。基于此,可以将公共行政中技术理性和科学方法的极端应用称为公共行政实践的泛技术化。公共行政实践的泛技术化主要体现为技术理性与专业主义的结合,对象的分解、还原与简化,结构性控制与谋求稳定秩序,重视结果而非过程与价值,祛魅化甚至主体的消解,强调理性化程序,经济与效率的至上。公共行政实践泛技术化的后果将导致种种异化、实践主体缺席、道德缺失与合作受阻以及远离真实行政世界等问题。公共行政的实践不仅仅是技术性的,也应该是道德性的,需要探索出一种全新的公共行政实践观。
[Abstract]:The two traditions of western practical philosophy provide a new perspective for distinguishing the essence and analysis of the concept of public administration practice. Unlike Aristotle's tradition of moral practice, Bacon's tradition of technical practice advocates the emphasis on the empirical, technical and instrumental aspects of scientific theory, and regards practice as the practical application and result of scientific theory. It constitutes the philosophical basis for analyzing the practice of modern public administration. Based on this, the extreme application of technological rationality and scientific methods in public administration can be called pan-technology of public administration practice. The pan-technicalization of public administration practice is mainly embodied in the combination of technical rationality and professionalism, the decomposition of objects, the reduction and simplification of objects, the structural control and the pursuit of stable order, the emphasis on the results rather than the process and value, the disenchantment and even the elimination of the subject. Emphasize rational procedure, economy and efficiency supreme. The consequences of pan-technology in public administration practice will lead to alienation, absence of practice subject, lack of morality and cooperation, and the absence of real administrative world. The practice of public administration is not only technical, but also moral.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国特色社会主义社会管理体系研究”(11&ZD070)
【分类号】：D523

【参考文献】