瞿中溶金石学研究

发布时间：2018-03-13 17:06

本文选题：瞿中溶　切入点：金石学　出处：《湖南师范大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：瞿中溶是清代嘉庆、道光年间江苏著名学者。为钱大昕女婿,宏通淹雅,金石之学尤深。曾任修嘉庆《湖南通志》,独纂金石一门,最为赅备,所擅长也。生平著述极多,尤以金石类研究为主。然迄今为止,尚无人对其金石学进行全面的研究。本文欲联系其学术环境,通过深入系统地研究瞿中溶的生平经历和金石著述,完成此项工作。本人分三章,第一章为“瞿中溶与金石学”,通过描述瞿中溶所处时代的金石学状况,及瞿氏早年金石学研究经历,深入分析了自宋代金石学肇始以来,前代学术遗产以及其当代金石学学术环境对其金石学研究的影响。第二章为“瞿中溶金石学著述考论”,对瞿中溶现存的金石学著述逐一进行客观介绍与分析,探析其不同类别金石学著述中所体现的学术意识及研究方法。第三章为“瞿中溶金石学评述”,首先从以金石为考古之资的学术意识、实事求是的学术态度和多闻阙疑的学术精神三个方面概括了瞿中溶的金石学思想及其特色。然后,总结了瞿中溶金石研究的方法,即远绍旁搜、亲力亲为；广征博引、列举类比；补缺证伪、详于考据。最后,指出了瞿中溶金石研究中的存在的失之夸博和信史太过两个缺陷。从这三个角度对瞿中溶的金石学作出评价。
[Abstract]:Qu Zhongyun, a famous scholar in Jiangsu Province during the period of Daoguang, was a famous scholar in the Qing Dynasty. He was Qian Daxin's son-in-law, Hongtong Yanya, and especially deep in the study of gold and stone. He had been appointed to revise Jiaqing's Hunan Tongzhi, compiling only one stone, the most comprehensive, the best at it, and he was also good at it. He wrote a lot about his life. However, so far, no one has made a comprehensive study of his petrology. This paper intends to contact his academic environment and complete this work through a thorough and systematic study of qu Zhongyong's life experience and his writings on gold and stone. I am divided into three chapters, the first chapter is "qu Zhongyong and the study of gold and stone". By describing the situation of the period of the period in which qu Zhongyong lived, and qu's early experience in the study of petrology, I have deeply analyzed the history of the study of the stone and gold since the beginning of the Song Dynasty. The influence of the academic heritage of the previous generation and the academic environment of its contemporary petrology on the study of its petrology. The second chapter is "an examination of qu Zhongyao's writings on the study of petrology", which makes an objective introduction and analysis one by one of qu Zhongyao's extant writings on the study of petrology. This paper analyzes the academic consciousness and research methods embodied in his various works on petrology. The third chapter is the commentary of qu Zhong's goldstone science. Firstly, the author starts with the academic consciousness of taking gold and stone as archaeological material. Three aspects of seeking truth from facts and lack of academic spirit generalize qu Zhongyong's thought and characteristics of goldstone. Enumerating analogies; making up for false evidence is more detailed than textual research. Finally, the author points out that there are two defects in qu Zhongyong's study of gold and stone, and points out that there are two defects in the study of gold and stone in qu Zhongyong's study. From these three angles, the author makes an evaluation of qu Zhongyao's petrology.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：K877

【引证文献】