长篇小说《泪洒豆满江》研究

发布时间：2018-03-15 01:20

本文选题：《泪洒豆满江》　切入点：后理念性　出处：《延边大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 朝鲜族移民题材长篇小说《苦难的年代》、《泪洒豆满江》、《间岛传说》等三部作品以共同的语言意识、历史意识、现实主义意识作为根基,是一脉相承的文学作品。但因作者所处的社会环境的不同,《泪洒豆满江》在主题设定、人物设定、矛盾设定等方面与《苦难的年代》和《间岛传说》存在差异,现实意识方面也豁然不同。存在这种差异的根本原因可以归结为社会背景。本论文将明确这一差异作为研究目的,以社会历史批评和文学社会学批评为理论根基,结合后殖民主义和民俗学理论,研究长篇小说《泪洒豆满江》的叙事方向、理念选择和传统民俗再现等。第一,长篇小说《泪洒豆满江》的叙事特点是,从外部层面作品将爱情矛盾放在主题中心,切断许多具有紧迫性和敏感性的历史问题,从内部层面作品反映了民族矛盾和阶级矛盾的真实性。第二,从后理念观点出发,作者有意切断了历史时间和历史事实。作品的时间界限是19世纪末到1910年代,反映了在这段时间朝鲜族移民开垦土地,建设家园的景象。也就是说小说是以民族文化学视角、民族心理学视角、民俗学视角贯穿全文,将重点放在发掘人间真实的生命欲望和潜意识上。第三,从理念中解脱,即倾向于后理念性,就是削减作品的历史性和现实性。作者在作品中有意切断历史现实,而致力把重点放在“民族的寻根”。在《泪洒豆满江》中,以通过贯穿全文的民族风俗和民族语言来完成“民族的寻根”。综上所述,《泪洒豆满江》中没有把抵抗日本侵略放在桌面,也没有将地主的欺压与阶级矛盾作为主线。作品关注的焦点的是扎根东北地区的朝鲜族移民的生存环境和生命意识,展现朝鲜族风土民情,民俗习惯,文化表现来寻觅民族整体性。这个整体性不是单纯的排他,而是朝鲜族固有的文化情绪所承载的矜持,这种矜持恰恰是通往民族解放与发展的道路,因而该作品可以说是一个“守候民族身份认同”的叙事。
[Abstract]:The three novels of Korean immigrants, "the Age of misery", "tears and beans" and "the Legend of Jiandao", are based on the common sense of language, history and realism. But due to the different social environment in which the author lives, there are differences in theme setting, character setting, contradiction setting and so on between the author and the time of suffering and the Legend of Jiandao. The fundamental reason for the difference can be attributed to the social background. This paper takes this difference as the research purpose, taking the social historical criticism and literary sociological criticism as the theoretical foundation. Combined with post-colonialism and folklore theory, this paper studies the narrative direction, the choice of ideas and the reappearance of traditional folklore in the novel "tears and beans in Manjiang". First, the narrative characteristic of the novel "tears and beans" is that the external works put the contradiction of love at the center of the theme, cutting off many urgent and sensitive historical problems. From the internal level, the works reflect the authenticity of national contradiction and class contradiction. Second, from the point of view of post-concept, the author deliberately cut off the historical time and historical facts. The time limit of the works is from the end of 19th century to the 1910s, which reflects the period during which Korean immigrants reclaimed land. In other words, the novel runs through the full text from the perspective of national culture, national psychology and folklore, and focuses on discovering the real life desire and subconscious consciousness of human beings. Third, to liberate from ideas, that is, to tend to post-idealistic, is to reduce the historical and realistic nature of the work. The author intends to cut off the historical reality in his work, and instead focuses on "the search for the roots of the nation." Through the text of national customs and national language to complete the "national roots." To sum up, No resistance to Japanese aggression was put on the table in the tearful Manjiang. Nor does it take the oppressive and class contradictions of the landlords as the main line. The focus of the works is the living environment and life consciousness of Korean immigrants who have taken root in the Northeast region, showing the Korean people's customs and customs. Cultural expression seeks national integrity. This integrity is not simply exclusive, but rather the reserve of the Korean nationality's inherent cultural emotions, which is precisely the road to national liberation and development. Therefore, the work can be said to be a "waiting for national identity" narrative.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：K877.42

【参考文献】