陕西神木大保当汉代墓葬人骨再分析

发布时间：2018-05-08 06:27

本文选题：人骨研究 + 体质人类学　；参考：《吉林大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：神木大保当墓地位于陕西省北部黄河流域，东眺黄河毗邻山西省，西临宁夏甘肃，北与内蒙古自治区伊克昭盟相辖，是农业文化和游牧文化的过渡地带。本文在该遗址已刊载的人类学材料基础上，对大保当古代居民的颅骨资料进行重新分析和研究。文中运用统计学的方法，结合考古学研究的成果，对该组居民的种系构成情况展开深入的探讨。全文共分为七章：第一章绪论简单地介绍了大保当墓地的地理位置，概述了大保当墓地的考古学背景，并阐明了本文的研究目的和意义。第二章种系纯净度检验采用多种方法对大保当墓地颅骨资料进行纯净度检验，结果表明该墓地古代居民是属于一个同种系的群体。第三章种系类型初步分析将大保当组颅骨数据与现代主要人种比较，结果表明，该人群属于蒙古人种类型。通过与现代蒙古人种的四个区域类型对比，发现该组居民与东亚类型具有很大的一致性，但也混有部分北亚类型的颅骨形态特征。第四章神木大保当居民与新石器时期古代人群的比较研究通过平均数组间差异均方根函数、欧式距离系数、聚类分析等方法，比较大保当古代居民与新石器时代各古代组的亲缘关系。研究表明，大保当组与庙底沟组古代人群体质关系最近，其次是大汶口组，与其他各组较为疏远。第五章神木大保当居民与青铜—早期铁器时代人群的比较研究运用平均数组间差异均方根函数、欧式距离系数、聚类分析和因子分析等方法，对大保当古代居民与青铜—早期铁器时代各古代组的亲缘关系进行比较，，发现大保当组与零口战国组、上马组关系最紧密，其次是白庙Ⅱ组、三角城组和殷墟中小墓③组，而与夏家店上层合并组关系最为疏远第六章神木大保当墓葬相关问题的讨论本章结合考古学、历史学、人类学等相关学科的研究成果，对大保当墓地古代居民的人种学类型进行了综合探讨。第七章结语对前六章的内容进行概况和总结。
[Abstract]:The Shimu Dadao cemetery is located in the the Yellow River River Basin in northern Shaanxi Province, east of the Yellow River, adjacent to Shanxi Province, Ningxia Gansu in the west, and YK Zhao League of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region in the north, which is the transition zone of agricultural culture and nomadic culture. In this paper, the method of statistics, combined with the results of archaeological research, is used to explore the composition of the population in this group. The full text is divided into seven chapters.
Chapter 1 Introduction
This paper briefly introduces the geographical location of the great Burton cemetery, outlines the archaeological background of the great Bao Ting cemetery, and expounds the purpose and significance of the study.
Second chapter purity test
A variety of methods were used to examine the purity of the skull data of the dbao Bao cemetery. The results show that the ancient inhabitants of the cemetery belong to a homologous group.
A preliminary analysis of the third chapter types
Comparing the cranium data of Dasu group with the modern main species, the results show that the population belongs to the type of Mongolia population. By comparing with the four regional types of modern Mongolia people, it is found that the population of this group is in great agreement with the type of East Asia, but it is also mixed with the morphological features of some northern subtypes of the skull.
The fourth chapter is a comparative study of Shenmu dbao residents and the Neolithic population.
By means of the mean square root function of the average array, the Euclidean distance coefficient and the cluster analysis, the relationship between the ancient residents and the ancient groups in the Neolithic age is compared. The study shows that the relationship between the dagangdou group and the miodi gully group is closest to the ancient population, followed by the Dagou group, which is far away from the other groups.
The fifth chapter is a comparative study of Shenmu dbao residents and the bronze early iron age population.
By means of the mean square root function of the average array, the Euclidean distance coefficient, the cluster analysis and the factor analysis, the relationship between the ancient residents and the ancient groups of the bronze early iron age is compared. It is found that the relationship between the dangbao group and the zero Warring States Group is the closest, and the second is the Bai Miao group, the triangle city and the Yin Ruins. The middle and small tombs are group 3, but the relationship with the upper group of the Xia Jia Dian is most estranged.
The sixth chapter discusses the related issues of Shenmu Da Bao tombs.
This chapter combines the research results of archaeology, history, anthropology and other related disciplines, and makes a comprehensive discussion on the ethnographic types of the ancient residents in dbao Bao cemetery.
The conclusion of the seventh chapter
The contents of the first six chapters are summarized and summarized.

【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：K878.8

【参考文献】